Dynamics of Russian and world science through the prism of international publications

Foresight Russia

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 38-59

  Kotsemir, Maxim ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Bibliometric indicators; Cross country analysis; Highly cited publications; Index of scientific specialization; International co authorship; Levels of citation; Place of Russia in the global scientific community; Publication activity; Publication activity in Russia; Russian Federation; Scientific publications; Scopus; Structure of publications; Web of Science

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886542780     PISSN: 1995459X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17323/1995-459x.2012.1.38.58     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aksnes D.W., Sivertsen G. (2004) The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators. Scientometrics, vol. 59, no 2, pp. 213-224.
2. Arunachalam S., Doss M.J. (2000) Mapping international collaboration in science in Asia through co-authorship analysis. Current Science, vol. 79, no 5, pp. 621-628.
3. Batygin G. (2001) "Effekt Matfeya": nakoplennoe preimushchestvo i raspredelenie statusov v nauke [Matthew Effect: Cumulative Advantage and the Distribution of Statuses in Science]. Vedomosti, Tyumen Oil and Gas University, Institute for Applied Ethics, no 18, pp. 173-185.
4. Bointz M. (2002) Rank of Nations and Heightened Competition in Matthew Core Journals: Two Faces of the Matthew Effect for Countries. Library Trends, vol. 50, no 3, pp. 440-460.
5. Bointz M. (2005) Ten Years Matthew Effect for Countries. Scientometrics, vol. 64, no 3, pp. 375-379.
6. Bointz M., Bruckner E., Sharnhorst A. (1997) Characteristics and Impact of the Matthew Effect for Countries. Scientometrics, vol. 40, no 3, pp. 407-422.
7. Bookstein A., Moed H., Yitzhaki M. (2006) Measures of International Collaboration in Scientific Literature: Part I. Information Processing and Management, vol. 42, pp. 1408-1421.
8. Bookstein A., Moed H., Yitzhaki M. (2006) Measures of international collaboration in scientific literature: Part II. Information Processing and Management, vol. 42, pp. 1422-1442.
9. Bookstein A., Yitzhaki M. (1999) Own-Language Preference: A New Measure of "Relative Language Self-Citation". Scientometrics, vol. 46, no 2, pp. 337-348.
10. Carpenter M.P., Narin F. (1981) The adequacy of the Science Citation Index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 32, no 6, pp. 430-439.
11. Egghe L., Rousseau R., Yitzhaki M. (1999) The "Own-Language Preference": Measures of Relative Language Self-Citation. Scientometrics, vol. 45, no 2, pp. 217-232.
12. Garfield E. (1976) English - An International Language for Science. Essays of an Information Scientist, vol. 1, ISI Press, pp. 19-20.
13. Glanzel W., Lange C. (1997) Modelling and Measuring Multilateral Co-Authorship in International Scientific Collaboration. Part II. A Comparative Study on the Extent and Change of International Scientific Collaboration Links. Scientometrics, vol. 40, no 3, pp. 605-626.
14. Glanzel W., Lange C. (1997) Modelling and Measuring Multilateral Co-authorship in International Scientific Collaboration. Part I. Development of a New Model Using a Series Expansion Approach. Scientometrics, vol. 49, no 3, pp. 593-604.
15. Glanzel W., Lange C. (2002) A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, vol. 54, no 1, pp. 75-89.
16. Glanzel W., Schubert A., Czerwon H.J. (1999) A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985-1995). Scientometrics, vol. 45, pp. 185-202.
17. Gokhberg L. (ed.) (2011) Rossiiskii innovatsionnyi indeks [Russian Innovation Index], Moscow: HSE.
18. Gokhberg L., Pislyakov V. (2008) Assessing the Relative Standing of Russian Science through a Set of Citation and Publication Indicators. Excellence and Emergence. Book of Abstracts.10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Vienna, pp. 400-403.
19. Gokhberg L., Sagieva G. (2007) Rossiiskaya nauka: bibliometricheskie indikatory [Russian Science: Bibliometric Indicators]. Foresight-Russia, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 44-53.
20. Kirchik O. (2011) "Nezametnaya" nauka: patterny internatsionalizatsii rossiiskikh nauchnykh publikatsii ["Invisible" Science: Patterns of Internationalization of Russian Scientific Publications]. Foresight-Russia, vol. 5, no 3, pp. 34-42.
21. Luukkonen T., Tijssen R.J.W., Persson O., Silvertsen G. (1993) The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, vol. 28, pp. 15-36.
22. Luwel M. (1999) Is the Science Citation Index US-biased? Scientometrics, vol. 46, no 3, pp. 549-562.
23. MacRoberts M.H., MacRoberts B.R. (1989) Problems of Citation Analysis: A Critical Review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 32, no 6, pp. 430-439.
24. Melin G., Persson O. (1996) Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, vol. 36, pp. 363-377.
25. Merton R.K. (1968) The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, vol. 159, no 3810, pp. 56-63.
26. Merton R.K. (1988) The Matthew Effect in Science II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property. ISIS, vol. 79, no 4, pp. 606-623.
27. Moed H.F., Vriens M. (1989) Possible inaccuracies occurring in citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, vol. 15, no 2, pp. 95-107.
28. Nederhof A.J., Moed H. F. (1993) Modelling Multinational Publication: Development of an On-line Fractionation Approach to Measure National Scientific Output. Scientometrics, vol. 27, pp. 39-52.
29. Pislyakov V. (2010) Soavtorstvo rossiiskikh uchenykh s zarubezhnymi kollegami: publikatsii i ikh tsitiruemost' [Co-authorship of Russian Scientists with Foreign Colleagues: Publications and Their Citation]. Preprint WP6/2010/01, Moscow: HSE.
30. Pislyakov V., D'yachenko E. (2009) Effekt Matveya v tsitirovanii statei rossiiskikh uchenykh, opublikovannykh za rubezhom [Matthew Effect in Citation of Russian International Publications]. NTI, Information processes and systems, vol. 2, no 3, pp. 19-24.
31. Schubert A., Glanzel W. (2006) Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics, vol. 69, no 2, pp. 409-428.
32. Tijssen R.J.W., Visser M.S., Van Leeuwen T.N. (2002) Benchmarking International Scientific Excellence: Are Highly Cited Research Papers an Appropriate Frame of Reference. Scientometrics, vol. 54, pp. 381-397.
33. van Leeuwen T.N., Moed H.F., Tijssen R.J.W., Visser M.S., van Raan A.F.J. (2000) First Evidence of Serious Language-bias in the Use of Citation Analysis for the Evaluation of National Science Systems. Research Evaluation, vol. 9, pp. 155-156.
34. Van Raan A.F.J. (2000) The Pandora's Box of Citation Analysis: Measuring Scientific Excellence - the Last Evil? The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honour of Eugene Garfield (eds. Corin B., Atkins H.B.), Medford: ASIS.
35. Wang Y., Wu Y., Pan Y., Ma Z., Rousseau R. (2005) Scientific collaboration in China as reflected in co-authorship. Scientometrics, vol. 62, no 2, pp. 183-198.
36. Yitzhaki M. (1998) The 'Language Preference' in Sociology: Measures of 'Language Self-Citation', 'Relative Own-language Preference Indicator', and 'Mutual Use of Languages'. Scientometrics, vol. 41, pp. 243-254.