Catheter insertion and perioperative practices within the ISPD North American Research Consortium

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 382-386

  Wallace, Eric L ^a   Fissell, Rachel B ^b   Golper, Thomas A ^b   Blake, Peter G ^c   Lewin, Adriane M ^d   Oliver, Matthew J ^e   Quinn, Rob R ^d  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Peritoneal dialysis; Peritoneal dialysis access; Peritoneal dialysis catheter; Tenckhoffcatheter

Indexed keywords

AMINOGLYCOSIDE; CEFAZOLIN; VANCOMYCIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHROLOGIST; OMENTECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; STATISTICS; URETHRAL CATHETER; CANADA; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; INDWELLING CATHETER; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; LAPAROSCOPY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

CANADA; CATHETERIZATION; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; LAPAROSCOPY; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84977543332     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: 17184304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2015.00089     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Perl J, Wald R, McFarlane P, Bargman JM, Vonesh E, Na Y, et al. Hemodialysis vascular access modifies the association between dialysis modality and survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22:1113-21.
2. Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Bargman J, Vonesh E. Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171:110-8.
3. USRDS. 2012 Atlas of CKD and ESRD. Volume 2, Chapter 11, Figure 11.7-Total Medicare ESRD expenditures per person per year, by modality: 332. Available at http://www.usrds.org/atlas.aspx.
4. Figueiredo A, Goh B-L, Jenkins S, Johnson DW, Mactier R, Ramalakshmi S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal access. Perit Dial Int 2010; 30(4):424-9.
5. SurveyMonkey Inc. www.surveymonkey.com. Palo Alto, California, USA.
6. Afolalu B, Troidle L, Osayimwen O, Bhargava J, Kitsen J, Finkelstein FO. Technique failure and center size in a large cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients in a defined geographic area. Perit Dial Int 2009; 29(3):292-6.
7. Huisman RM, Nieuwenhuizen MGM, de Charro FT. Patient-related and centre-related factors influencing technique survival of peritoneal dialysis in The Netherlands. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17(9):1655-60.
8. Mehrotra R, Khawar O, Duong U, Fried L, Norris K, Nissenson A, et al. Ownership patterns of dialysis units and peritoneal dialysis in the United States: utilization and outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 54(2):289-98.
9. Mehrotra R, Chiu Y, Kalantar-Zadeh K, and Vonesh, E. The outcomes of continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis are similar. Kidney Int 2009; 76:97-107.
10. Schaubel D, Blake P, Fenton S. Effect of renal center characteristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2001; 60:1517-24.
11. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(15):1128-37.
12. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR, Sierra R, Touchard C, Dunne JB, Scott DJ. Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 2005; 138(2):165-70.
13. Rao A, Pitcher D, Fluck R, Kumwenda M. UK Renal Registry 17th Annual Report: Chapter 10. 2013 Multisite dialysis access audit in England, Northern Ireland and Wales and 2012 PD one year follow-up: national and centre-specific analyses. Nephron 2015; 129(Suppl 1):223-45.
14. Crabtree JH. Fluoroscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a harvest of the low-hanging fruits. Perit Dial Int 2008; 28(2):134-7.
15. CARI: Technique of insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter. Available at http://www.cari.org.au.
16. CARI: Type of peritoneal dialysis catheter. Available at http://www.cari.org.au.
17. Lo W-K. Peritoneal dialysis utilization and outcome: what are we facing? Perit Dial Int 2007; 27(Suppl 2):S42-7.
18. Danielsson A, Blohme L, Tranaeus A, Hylander B. A prospective randomized study of the effect of a subcutaneously “buried” peritoneal dialysis catheter technique versus standard technique on the incidence of peritonitis and exit-site infection. Perit Dial Int 2002; 22(2):211-19.
19. Gadallah MF, Ramdeen G, Mignone J, Patel D, Mitchell L, Tatro S. Role of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing postoperative peritonitis in newly placed peritoneal dialysis catheters. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36(5):1014-9.
20. Flanigan M, Gokal R. Peritoneal catheters and exit-site practices toward optimum peritoneal access: A review of current developments. Perit Dial Int 2005; 25(2):132-9.
21. Ersoy FF. Improving technique survival in peritoneal dialysis: what is modifiable? Perit Dial Int 2009; 29(Suppl 2):S74-7.
22. Yu Y, Zhou Y, Wang H, Zhou T, Li Q, Li T, et al. Impact of continuous quality improvement initiatives on clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2014; 34(Suppl 2):S43-8.
23. Figueiredo A, Goh B, Jenkins S, Johnson D, Mactier R, Ramalakshmi S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal access. Perit Dial Int 2010; 30(4):424-9.