Shared decision making in mental health care using routine outcome monitoring as a source of information: A cluster randomised controlled trial

BMC Psychiatry

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Metz, Margot J ^a   Franx, Gerdien C ^b   Veerbeek, Marjolein A ^c   de Beurs, Edwin ^d   van der Feltz Cornelis, Christina M ^e   Beekman, Aartjan T F ^f  

^a GGZ Breburg Groep   (Netherlands)

^b Trimbos institute and Foundation 113Online   (Netherlands)

^c NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN BRANCH   (Netherlands)

^e TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cluster randomised controlled trial; Mental health care; Quality improvement collaborative (QIC); Routine outcome monitoring; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; MENTAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; MODEL; MONITORING; ORGANIZATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ADULT; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THEORETICAL MODEL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84977453690     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1471244X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-015-0696-2     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Elwyn G, Forsch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P. Shared Decision Making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1361-7.
2. Patel SR. Recent advances in Shared Decision Making for Mental Health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008;21(6):606-12.
3. Deegan PE, Drake RE. Shared decision making and medication management in the recovery process. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57:11.
4. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or, it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681-92.
5. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651-61.
6. Stacey D, Légare F, Col NF, Bennett CI, Barry MJ, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (review). The Cochrane Collaboration. 2014; doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
7. Malm U, Ivarsson B, Allebeck P, Falloon IRH. Integrated care in schizophrenia: a 2-year randomised controlled study of two communitybased treatment programs. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;107:415-23.
8. Loh A, Simon D, Wills CE, Kriston L, Niebling W, Härter M. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67:324-32.
9. Loh A, Leonhart R, Wills CE, Simon D, Härter M. The impact of patient participation on adherence and clinical outcome in primary care of depression. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65:69-78.
10. Hamann J, Langer B, Winkler V, Busch R, Cohen R, Leucht S, et al. Shared decision making for in-patients with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006;114:265-73.
11. Clever SL, Ford DE, Rubenstein LV, Rost KM, Meredith LS, Sherbourne CD, et al. Primary care patients' involvement in decision-making is associated with improvement in depression. Med Care. 2006;44(5):398-405.
12. Westermann GMA, Verheij F, Winkens B, Verhulst FC, Van Oort FVA. Structured shared decision-making using dialogue and visualization: a randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90:74-81.
13. Delas Cuevas C, Penate W, de Rivera L. To what extent is treatment adherence of psychiatric patients influenced by their participation in shared decision making? Patient Preference and Adherence. 2014;8:1547-53.
14. Helmus K, Bezemer M, Slooff C. Shared decision making binnen de zorg voor mensen met psychose. Psychopraktijk. 2011;3:30-4.
15. Goossensen A, Zijlstra P, Koopmanschap M. Measuring shared decision making processes in psychiatry: skills versus patient satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67:50-6.
16. Loh A, Simon D, Hennig B, Härter M, Elwyn G. The assessment of depressive patients' involvement in decision making in audio-taped primary care consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(3):314-8.
17. Adams JR, Drake RE, Wolford GL. Shared Decision-Making Preferences of People with Severe Mental Illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;59:9.
18. Swenson SL, Buell S, Zettler P, White M, Ruston DC, Lo B. Patient-centered communication: do patients really prefer it? JGIM. 2004;19:1069-79.
19. Hamann J, Cohen R, Leucht S, Busch R, Kissling W. Do patients with schizophrenia wish to be involved in decisions about their medical treatment? Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(12):2382-4.
20. Bunn MH, O'Connor AM, Tansey MS, Jones BD, Stinson LE. Characteristics of patients with schizophrenia who express certainty or uncertainty about continuing treatment with depot neuroleptic medication. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1997;11(5):238-48.
21. Arora NK, McHorney CA. Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? Med Care. 2000;38(3):335-41.
22. Beurs de E, ME H d-G, van YR R, van der NJ W, Giltay EJ, van MS N, et al. Routine outcome monitoring in the Netherlands: practical experiences with a web-based strategy for the assessment of treatment outcome in clinical practice. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18(1):1-12. doi:10.1002/cpp.696.
23. Jong de K, Sluis van P, Nugter AM, Heiser WJ, Spinhoven P. Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomised clinical trial. Psychother Res. 2012;22(4):464-74.
24. Jong de K, Timman R, Hakkaart-van Royen L, Vermeulen P, Kooiman K, Passchier J, et al. The effect of outcome monitoring feedback to clinicians and patients in short and long-term psychotherapy: a randomised controlled trial. Psychother Res. 2014;24(6):629-39.
25. Lambert M. Presidential Address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychother Res. 2007;17:1-14.
26. Sonsbeek AMS, Hutschemaekers GJM, Veerman JW, Tiemens BG. Effective components of feedback from Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) in youth mental health care: study protocol of a three-arm parallel-group randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:3.
27. Verbraak M, Theuws S, Verdellen C. ROM en benchmarken: een voorbeeld van een geïntegreerde aanpak. Directieve therapie. 2015;35:2.
28. Carlier IVE, Meuldijk D, van Vliet IM, van Fenema EM, van der Wee NJA, Zitman FG. Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: evidence and theory. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18:104-10.
29. Knaup C, Koesters M, Schoefer D, Becker T, Puschner B. Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195(1):15-22.
30. Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Hawkins EJ, Vermeersch DA, Nielsen SJ, Smart DW. Is it time for clinicians to routinely track patient outcome? A meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2003;10(3):288-301.
31. Sapyta J, Riemer M, Bickman L. Feedback to clinicians: Theory, research and practice. J Clin Psychol. 2005;61:145-53.
32. Davidson K, Perry A, Bell L. Would continuous feedback of patient's clinical outcomes to clinicians improve NHS psychological therapy services? Critical analysis and assessment of quality of existing studies. Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract. 2015;88(1):21-37.
33. Lambert MJ. Prevention of Treatment Failure: The use of Measuring, Monitoring, and Feedback in Clinical Practice. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2010.
34. Feltz van der-Cornelis C, Andrea H, Kessels E, Duivenvoorden H, Biemans H, Metz M. Shared Decision Making in combinatie met ROM bij patiënten met gecombineerde lichamelijke en psychische klachten; een klinisch empirische verkenning. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2014; 56(6):375-84.
35. Schouten LM, Hulscher ME, Everdingen van JJ, Huijsman R, Grol RP. Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. BMJ. 2008;336(7659):1491-4.
36. Franx, GC. Quality improvement in mental health care: the transfer of knowledge into practice. Utrecht: Trimbos-institute; 2012.
37. Øvretveit J, Bate P, Cleary P, Cretin S, Gustafson D, McInnes K, et al. Quality collaboratives: lessons from research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11(4):345-51.
38. Légaré F, LeBlanc A, Robitaille H, Turcotte S. The decisional conflict scale: moving from the individual to the dyad level. Z. Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundh Wesen (ZEFQ). 2012;106:247-52.
39. O'Connor AM. User-Manual-Decisional Conflict Scale (16 item statement format). Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 1993, updated 2010.
40. van Widenfelt BM, Treffers PDA, de Beurs E, Siebelink BM, Koudijs E. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of assessment instruments used in psychological research with children and families. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2005;8:2.
41. Tracey TJ, Kokotovic AM. Factor structure of the working alliance inventory. Psychol Assess. 1989;1(3):207-10.
42. Vertommen H, Vervaeke GAC. Werkalliantievragenlijst (WAV). Vertaling voor experimenteel gebruik van de WAI (Horvart & Greenberg, 1986). Departement Psychologie KU Leuven, 1990.
43. Stinckens N, Ulburghs A, Claes L. De werkalliantie als sleutelelement in het therapiegebeuren. Meting met behulp van de WAV-12, de Nederlandstalige verkorte versie van de Working Alliance Inventory. Tijdschrift Klinische Psychologie. 2009;1:44-60.
44. Bordin E. The generalizability of the psycho-analytic concept of the working alliance. Psychother Theory Res Pract Train. 1979;16:252-60.
45. Ardito RB, Rabellino D. Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Front. Psychol. 2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00270.
46. Busseri MA, Tyler JD. Interchangeability of the Working Alliance Inventory and Working Alliance Inventory Short Form. Psychol Assess. 2003;15:193-7.
47. Smits D, Luyckx K. Structural Characteristics and external correlates of the working alliance inventory short form. Psychol Assess. 2015;27(2):545-51.
48. Nieuwenhuizen van Ch, Schene AH, Koeter MWJ. Manchester Short Assessment of quality of life (MANSA). 2000.
49. Jong de K, Nugter MA, Lambert MJ, Burlingame GM. Handleiding voor afname en scoring van de Outcome Questionnaire OQ-45.2. Salt Lake City :OQ Measures LLC; Oktober 2008.
50. Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S. Application and results of the Manchester short assessment of quality of live (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1999;45(1):7-12.
51. Scholl I, Koelewijn-van Loon M, Sepucha K, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Härter M, et al. Measurement of shared decison making -a review of instruments. Science Direct. 2011;105:313-24.
52. Scholl I, Kriston L, Dirmaier J, Buchholz A, Härter M. Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire -physician version (SDM-Q-Doc). Patient Educ Couns. 2012;88:284-90.
53. Rodenburg-Vandenbussche S, Pieterse AH, Kroonenberg PM, Scholl I, Weijden van der T, Luyten GPM, et al. Dutch translation and psychometric testing of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician version (SDM-QDoc) in primary and secondary care. PLoS One. 2015; doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0132158.
54. Trimbos instituut. Implementatie van ROM in de dagelijkse zorgpraktijk. Resultaten van enquêtes onder behandelaren van GGZ instellingen en vrijgevestigde behandelaren. Salt Lake City: OQ Measures LLC; 2014.
55. Pearlin LI, Lieberman MA. The stress process. J Health Soc Behav. 1981;22:337-56.
56. Lipsey MW. Design sensitivity: statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park: Sage 1990. p. 137.
57. Killip S, Mahfoud Z, Pearce K. What is an Intracluster Correlation Coefficient? Curcial concepts for primary care researchers. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(3):204-8.