Will electrical cyber–physical interdependent networks undergo first-order transition under random attacks?

Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications

Volumn 460, Issue , 2016, Pages 235-245

  Ji, Xingpei ^a   Wang, Bo ^a   Liu, Dichen ^a   Dong, Zhaoyang ^b   Chen, Guo ^b   Zhu, Zhenshan ^a   Zhu, Xuedong ^a   Wang, Xunting ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cascading failures; Electrical cyber physical system; First order transition; Interdependent networks; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION NETWORKS; NETWORK SECURITY;

CASCADING FAILURES; FIRST ORDER TRANSITIONS; PHYSICAL SYSTEMS; RANDOM ATTACKS; RANDOM FAILURES; SERVICE DEMAND; VULNERABILITY; VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS;

NETWORK LAYERS;

EID: 84977150496     PISSN: 03784371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. [1] Saber, A.Y., Venayagamoorthy, G.K., Efficient utilization of renewable energy sources by gridable vehicles in cyber-physical energy systems. IEEE Syst. J. 4:3 (2010), 285–294.
2. [2] Georg, H., Mueller, S.C., Rehtanz, C., Wietfeld, C., Analyzing cyber-physical energy systems: the INSPIRE cosimulation of power and ICT systems using HLA. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 10:4 (2014), 2364–2373.
3. [3] Ilic, M.D., Le, Xie., Khan, U.A., Moura, J.M.F., Modeling of future cyber-physical energy systems for distributed sensing and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A 40:4 (2010), 825–838.
4. [4] Palensky, P., Widl, E., Elsheikh, A., Simulating cyber-physical energy systems: challenges, tools and methods. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 44:3 (2014), 318–326.
5. [5] Facchinetti, T., Della Vedova, M.L., Real-time modeling for direct load control in cyber-physical power systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 7:4 (2011), 689–698.
6. [6] Pahwa, S., Scoglio, C., Scala, A., Abruptness of cascade failures in power grids. Sci. Rep., 2014, 4.
7. [7] Zhang, F., Sun, Y.Z, Cheng, L., Li, X., Measurement and modeling of delays in wide-area closed-loop control systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30:5 (2015), 2426–2433.
8. [8] Scala, A., Pahwa, S., Scoglio, C.M., Cascade failures and distributed generation in power grids. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. 11:1 (2015), 27–35.
9. [9] Zhang, F., Cheng, L., Li, X., Sun, Y.Z., Gao, W.Z, Zhao, W.X., Application of a real-time data compression and adapted protocol technique for WAMS. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30:2 (2015), 653–662.
10. [10] A. Scala, P.G.D.S. Lucentini, The equal load-sharing model of cascade failures in power grids, 2015. arXiv:1506.01527.
11. [11] Scala, A., Lucentini, P.G.D.S., Equal load-sharing models of cascades in network infrastructures. Saf. Reliab. Complex Eng. Syst., 2015, 4493–4498.
12. [12] Vespignani, A., Complex networks: The fragility of interdependency. Nature 464 (2010), 984–985.
13. [13] Bobbio, A., Bonanni, G., Ciancamerla, E., Clemente, R., Iacomini, A., Minichino, M., Scarlatti, A., Terruggia, R., Zendri, E., Unavailability of critical SCADA communication links interconnecting a power grid and a Telco network. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95 (2010), 1345–1357.
14. [14] Buldyrev, S.V., Parshani, R., Paul, G., Stanley, H.E., Havlin, S., Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 464 (2010), 1025–1028.
15. [15] Yagan, O., Qian, D.J., Zhang, J.S., Cochran, D., Optimal allocation of interconnecting links in cyber-physical systems: Interdependence, cascading failures, and robustness. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 23 (2012), 1708–1720.
16. [16] Zhou, D., Gao, J.X, Stanley, H.E., Havlin, S., Percolation of partially interdependent scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. E, 87, 2013, 0528125.
17. [17] Zhou, D., Stanley, E., Agostino, G.D., Scala, A., Assortativity decreases the robustness of interdependent networks. Phys. Rev. E, 86, 2012, 066103.
18. [18] Scala, A., Lucentini, P.G.D.S., Caldarelli, G., Agostino, G.D., Cascades in interdependent flow networks. Physica D, 2015.
19. [19] Ji, X.P., Wang, B., Liu, D.C., Improving interdependent networks robustness by adding connectivity links. Physica A 444 (2016), 9–19.
20. [20] Qiu, Y.Z, Optimal weighting scheme and the role of coupling strength against load failures in degree-based weighted interdependent networks. Physica A 392:8 (2013), 1920–1924.
21. [21] Shao, J., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., Stanley, H.E., Cascade of failures in coupled network systems with multiple support-dependence relations. Phys. Rev. E, 83, 2011, 03611632.
22. [22] Schneider, C.M., Yazdani, N., Araújo, N.A.M., Havlin, S., Herrmann, H.J., Towards designing robust coupled networks. Sci. Rep., 3, 2013, 01969.
23. [23] Valdez, L.D., Macri, P.A., Braunstein, L.A., A triple point induced by targeted autonomization on interdependent scale-free networks. J. Phys. A, 47, 2014, 0550025.
24. [24] Nguyen, D.T., Shen, Y., Thai, M.T., Detecting critical nodes in interdependent power networks for vulnerability assessment. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4 (2013), 151–159.
25. [25] Huang, X.Q., Gao, J.X, Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., Stanley, H.E., Robustness of interdependent networks under targeted attack. Phys. Rev. E, 83, 2011, 06510162.
26. [26] G.G. Dong, J.X. Gao, L.X. Tian, R.J Du, Y.H He, Percolation of partially interdependent networks under targeted attack, 2012, 85, 01611212.
27. [27] Cheng, Z.S., Cao, J.D., Cascade of failures in interdependent networks coupled by different type networks. Physica A 430 (2015), 193–200.
28. [28] Tian, M., Wang, X.P., Dong, Z.C., Zhu, G.W., Cascading failures of interdependent modular scale-free networks with different coupling preferences. Europhys. Lett., 111, 2015, 180071.
29. [29] Wang, J.W, Li, Y., Zheng, Q.F., Cascading load model in interdependent networks with coupled strength. Physica A 430 (2015), 242–253.
30. [30] Huang, Z., Wang, C., Stojmenovi, M., Nayak, A., Characterization of cascading failures in interdependent cyber-physical systems. IEEE Trans. Comput. 64:8 (2015), 2158–2168.
31. [31] Dong, G.G., Du, R.J., Tian, L.X., Liu, R.R., Robustness of network of networks with interdependent and interconnected links. Physica A 424 (2015), 11–18.
32. [32] Z. Huang, C. Wang, S. Ruj, M. Stojmenovi, Modeling cascading failures in smart power grid using interdependent complex networks and percolation theory, in: 8th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, Melbourne, Australia, 2013.
33. [33] Parshani, R., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., Interdependent networks: reducing the coupling strength leads to a change from a first to second order percolation transition. Phys Rev. Lett., 105, 2010, 0487014.
34. [34] Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H., Collective dynamics of small- worlfd networks. Nature 393 (1998), 440–442.
35. [35] Habib, M.F., Tornatore, M., Dikbiyik, F., Mukherjee, B., Disaster survivability in optical communication networks. Comput. Commun. 36:6 (2013), 630–644.
36. [36] Quattrociocchi, W., Caldarelli, G., Scala, A., Self-healing networks: redundancy and structure. PloS One, 9(2), 2014, e87986.
37. [37] Parshani, R., Rozenblat, C., Ietri, D., Ducruet, C., Havlin, S., Inter-similarity between coupled networks. Europhys. Lett., 92, 2010, 68002.
38. [38] Hu, J.Q, Yu, J., Cao, J.D., Ni, M., Yu, W.J., Topological interactive analysis of power system and its communication module: A complex network approach. Physica A 416 (2014), 99–111.