Correction to De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote (J Med Libr Assoc, (2016) 104, 3, (240-243), 10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.014);De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in endnote

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 240-243

  Bramer, Wichor M ^a   Giustini, Dean ^b   De Jong, Gerdien B ^a   Holland, Leslie ^c   Bekhuis, Tanja ^d  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c SOUTHERN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LITERATURE; PROCEDURES;

DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84977134570     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797615602271     Document Type: Erratum

References (14)

1. Levay P, Raynor M, Tuvey D. The contributions of MEDLINE, other bibliographic databases and various search techniques to NICE public health guidance. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2015;10(1):50–68.
2. Ahmadi M, Sarabi RE, Orak RJ, Bahaadinbeigy K. Information retrieval in telemedicine: a comparative study on bibliographic databases. Acta Inform Med. 2015; 23(3):172–6.
3. Lorenzetti DL, Topfer LA, Dennett L, Clement F. Value of databases other than MEDLINE for rapid health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assessment Health Care. 2014;30(02):173–8.
4. Beyer FR, Wright K. Can we prioritise which databases to search? a case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management. Health Inf Libr J. 2013; 30(1):49–58.
5. Qi X, Yang M, Ren W, Jia J, Wang J, Han G, Fan D. Find duplicates among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases in systematic review. PLOS One. 2013; 8(8):e71838.
6. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of systematic review assistant-deduplication module. Systematic Rev. 2015;4(1):6.
7. Jiang Y, Lin C, Meng W, Yu C, Cohen AM, Smalheiser NR. Rule-based deduplication of article records from bibliographic databases. Database: J Biological Databases Curation. 2014;2014:bat086.
8. Kwon Y, Lemieux M, McTavish J, Wathen N. Identifying and removing duplicate records from systematic review searches. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Oct; 103(4):184–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.004.
9. Bramer WM, Holland L, Mollema J, Hannon T, Bekhuis T. Removing duplicates in retrieval sets from electronic databases: comparing the efficiency and accuracy of the Bramer-method with other methods and software packages. Proceedings of the 14th European Association for Health Information and Libraries (EAHIL) Conference, 57-9; Rome, Italy; 11–13 Jun 2014.
10. EndNote. Version X7. Thomson Reuters; 2015.
11. National Library of Medicine. PubMed [Internet]. The Library; 2016 [cited 4 Feb 2016]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/.
12. Ovid MEDLINE [Internet]. Wolters Kluwer; 2016 [cited 4 Feb 2016]. http://site.ovid.com/pdf/OvidMedline_fs.pdf.
13. Cochrane. Cochrane Library [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons; 2016 [cited 4 Feb 2016]. http://www.cochranelibrary.com.
14. Reference Manager. Version 12. Thomson Reuters; 2008.