Design approaches to experimental mediation

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue , 2016, Pages 29-38

  Pirlott, Angela G ^a   MacKinnon, David P ^b  

^a SAINT XAVIER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Causal inference; Experimental mediation; Mediation

Indexed keywords

BULLOCK; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DEPENDENT VARIABLE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; MEDIATOR; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCIENTIST; THINKING;

EID: 84977117422     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 51:6 (1986), 1173–1182, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
2. Brewer, M.B., Research design and issues of validity. Reis, H.T., Judd, C.M., (eds.) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 2000, Cambridge University Press, New York, 3–16.
3. Brewer, M.B., Crano, W.D., Research design and issues of validity. Reis, H.T., Judd, C.M., (eds.) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 2nd ed., 2014, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 11–26.
4. Bullock, J.G., Green, D.P., Ha, S.E., Yes, but what's the mechanism? (don't expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98 (2010), 550–558, 10.1037/a0018933.
5. Cerin, E., MacKinnon, D.P., A commentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity. Public Health Nutrition 12:8 (2009), 1182–1188, 10.1017/S1368980008003649.
6. Cialdini, R.B., We have to break up. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4:1 (2009), 5–6, 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01091.x.
7. Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T., Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. 1979, Rand-McNally, Chicago.
8. Cook, T.D., Groom, C., The methodological assumptions of social psychology: The mutual dependence of substantive theory and method choice. Sansone, C., Morf, C.C., Panter, A.T., (eds.) The Sage handbook of methods in social psychology, 2004, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 19–44.
9. Cooper, J., Zanna, M.P., Taves, P.A., Arousal as a necessary condition for attitude change following induced compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (1978), 1101–1106, 10.1037/0022-3514.36.10.1101.
10. Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology: Special Issue on Rigorous and Replicable Methods in Social Psychology 66 (2016), 68–80.
11. Glynn, A.N., Quinn, K.M., Why process matters for causal inference. Political Analysis 19:3 (2011), 273–286.
12. Halberstadt, J., My plan for more efficient reviewing [Society for Personality and Social Psychology electronic mailing list email]. 2010, June 8 (Retrieved from https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/spsp-discuss/4Q-TZlsLrRg).
13. Hayes, A.F., Scharkow, M., The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter?. Psychological Science 24 (2013), 1918–1927, 10.1177/0956797613480187.
14. Hill, A.B., Principles of medical statistics. 9th ed., 1971, Oxford, New York.
15. Holland, P.W., Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equation models. Sociological Methodology 18 (1988), 449–484, 10.2307/271055.
16. Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., Schultze, T., Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology: Special Issue on Rigorous and Replicable Methods in Social Psychology 66 (2016), 81–92.
17. Imai, K., Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T., Experimental designs for identifying causal mechanisms. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 176 (2013), 5–51.
18. Jacoby, J., Sassenberg, K., Interactions not only tell us when, but can also tell us how: Testing process hypotheses by interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology 41 (2011), 180–190, 10.1002/ejsp.762.
19. James, L.R., The unmeasured variables problem in path analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 65 (1980), 415–421.
20. Jo, B., Discussion on the paper by Imai, Tingley, and Yamamoto. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 176 (2013), 40–41.
21. Judd, C.M., Kenny, D.A., Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review 5 (1981), 602–619, 10.1177/0193841X8100500502.
22. Kashy, D.A., Donnellan, M.B., Ackerman, R.A., Russell, D.W., Reporting and interpreting research in PSPB: Practices, principles, and pragmatics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35 (2009), 1131–1142, 10.1177/0146167208331253.
23. Li, Y.J., Johnson, K.A., Cohen, A.B., Williams, M.J., Knowles, E.D., Chen, Z., Fundamental(ist) attribution error: Protestants are dispositionally focused. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102:2 (2012), 281–290, 10.1037/a0026294.
24. MacKinnon, D.P., Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. 2008, Erlbaum, New York.
25. MacKinnon, D.P., Pirlott, A.G., Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review 19:1 (2015), 30–43, 10.1177/1088868314542878.
26. MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S.G., Sheets, V., Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods 7 (2002), 83–104, 10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.83.
27. Mark, M.M., Validity typologies and the logic and practice of quasi-experimentation. Trochim, W.M.K., (eds.) Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis, 1986, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 47–66.
28. Mark, M.M., From program theory to tests of program theory. New Directions for Program Evaluation 47 (1990), 37–51, 10.1002/ev.1553.
29. McDonald, R.P., Haldane's lungs: A case study in path analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research 32 (1997), 1–38, 10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_1.
30. Neuberg, S.L., Fiske, S.T., Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (1987), 431–444, 10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.431.
31. O'Carroll, R.E., Drysdale, E., Cahill, L., Shajahan, P., Ebmeier, K.P., Stimulation of the noradrenergic system enhances and blockade reduces memory for emotional material in man. Psychological Medicine 29 (1999), 1083–1088, 10.1017/S0033291799008703.
32. Pearl, J., Causality: models, reasoning, and inference. 2000, Cambridge University Press.
33. Quinones-Vidal, E., Lopez-Garcia, J.J., Penaranda-Ortega, M., Tortosa-Gil, F., The nature of social and personality psychology as reflected in JPSP, 1965–2000. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86:3 (2004), 435–452, 10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.435.
34. Robins, J.M., Greenland, S., Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 3 (1992), 143–155 (Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3702894).
35. Rubin, D.B., Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 66 (1974), 688–701, 10.1037/h0037350.
36. Rubin, D.B., Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics 2 (1977), 1–26, 10.2307/1164933.
37. Rucker, D.D., Preacher, K.J., Tormala, Z.L., Petty, R.E., Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 5:6 (2011), 359–371, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x.
38. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T., Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. 2002, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
39. Sheets, V.L., Braver, S.L., Organization status and perceived sexual harassment: Detecting the mediators of a null effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (1999), 1159–1171, 10.1177/01461672992512009.
40. Sigall, H., Mills, J., Measures of independent variables and mediators are useful in social psychology experiments: But are they necessary?. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2 (1998), 218–226.
41. Smith, E.R., Beliefs, attributions, and evaluations: Nonhierarchical models of mediation in social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43:2 (1982), 248–259, 10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.248.
42. Smith, E.R., Research design. Reis, H.T., Judd, C.M., (eds.) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 2000, Cambridge University Press, New York, 17–39.
43. Smith, E.R., Editorial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102:1 (2012), 1–3, 10.1037/a0026676.
44. Spencer, S.J., Zanna, M.P., Fong, G.T., Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (2005), 845–851, 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845.
45. Stone-Romero, E.F., Rosopa, P.J., The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organizational Research Methods 11:2 (2008), 326–352, 10.1177/1094428107300342.
46. VanderWeele, T.J., Vansteelandt, S., Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions, and composition. Statistics and Its Interface (Special Issue on Mental Health and Social Behavioral Science) 2 (2009), 457–468.
47. West, S.G., Thoemmes, F., Campbell's and Rubin's perspectives on causal inference. Psychological Methods 15:1 (2010), 18–37, 10.1037/a0015917.
48. Word, C.O., Zanna, M.P., Cooper, J., The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 10 (1974), 109–120, 10.1016/0022-1031(74)90059-6.