How to publish rigorous experiments in the 21st century

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue , 2016, Pages 145-147

  Fiske, Susan T ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Experiments; External validity; Internal validity; Replicability; Theory

Indexed keywords

EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; GROUNDED THEORY; HUMAN; INTERNAL VALIDITY; LOGIC; META ANALYSIS; PROFIT;

EID: 84977083489     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.006     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. Berinsky, A., Margolis, M., Sances, M., Can we turn shirkers into workers?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2016.
2. Campbell, D.T., Fiske, D.W., Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56:2 (1959), 81–105 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046016).
3. Crandall, C.S., Sherman, J.W., On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 93–99.
4. Curran, P.G., Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 4–19.
5. Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 68–80.
6. Fiske, S.T., Mind the gap: In praise of informal sources of formal theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (2004), 132–137.
7. Fiske, S.T., Scratch an itch with a brick: Why we do research. Reis, H.T., Judd, C.M., (eds.) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 2nd ed., 2014, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1–7.
8. Hales, A., Does the conclusion follow from the evidence? Recommendations for improving research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 39–46.
9. Huffmeier, J., Mazei, J., Schultze, T., Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 81–92.
10. Jussim, L., Crawford, J.T., Anglin, S.M., Stevens, S.T., Duarte, J.L., Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 116–133.
11. Maner, J.K., Into the wild: Field studies can increase both replicability and real-world impact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 100–106.
12. Pirlott, A., MacKinnon, D.P., Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 29–38.
13. Sakaluk, J.K., Exploring small, confirming big: An alternative system to the new statistics for advancing cumulative and replicable psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 47–54.
14. Schaller, M., The empirical benefits of conceptual rigor: Systematic articulation of conceptual hypotheses can reduce the risk of non-replicable results (and facilitate novel discoveries too). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 107–115.
15. Schweinsberg, M., et al. The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 55–67.
16. Stroebe, W., Are most published social psychological findings false?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 134–144.