Charting the future of social psychology on stormy seas: Winners, losers, and recommendations

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue , 2016, Pages 153-158

  Baumeister, Roy F ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977071018     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.003     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Baumeister, R.F., Vohs, K.D., Funder, D.C., Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2 (2007), 396–403, 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x.
2. Berinsky, A., Can we turn shirkers into workers?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 20–28 (in this issue).
3. Ioannidis, J.P., Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, 1997, e124.
4. Jussim, L., Crawford, J.T., Anglin, S.M., Stevens, S.T., Duarte, J.L., Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 116–133 (in this issue).
5. Maner, J.K., Into the wild: Field studies can increase both replicability and real-world impact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 100–106 (in this issue).
6. Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), 2015, 10.1126/science.aac4716.
7. Pirlott, A., MacKinnon, D.P., Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 29–38 (in this issue).
8. Sakaluk, J.K., Exploring small, confirming big: An alternative system to the new statistics for advancing cumulative and replicable psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 47–54 (in this issue).
9. Schaller, M., The empirical benefits of conceptual rigor: Systematic articulation of conceptual hypotheses can reduce the risk of non-replicable results (and facilitate novel discoveries too). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 107–115 (in this issue).
10. Schweinsberg, M., Madan, N., Vianello, M., Sommer, S.A., Jordan, J., Tierney, W. Uhlmann, E.L., The pipeline project: pre-publication independent replication of a single laboratory's research pipeline. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 55–67 (in this issue).
11. Stroebe, W., Are most published social psychological findings false?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (2016), 134–144 (in this issue).
12. Swets, J.A., Dawes, R.M., Monahan, J., Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 1 (2000), 1–26.
13. Twenge, J.M., Baumeister, R.F., Tice, D.M., Stucke, T.S., If you can't join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001), 1058–1069, 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1058.
14. Zhou, H., Fishbach, A., Selection bias in online panels: How unattended experimental attrition lead to surprising (yet false) research conclusions. 2016 (working paper).