The political logic of China’s new environmental courts

China Journal

Volumn 72, Issue , 2014, Pages 53-74

  Stern, Rachel E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977069483     PISSN: 13249347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/677051     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Xinhua News Agency, “China Resorts to Judicial Protection in Green Push” (21 July 2013), http://tinyurl.com/nysoscw, accessed 15 January 2014.
2. Robert A. Kagan, “Introduction”, in Philippe Nonet and Philip Selznick, Law and Society in Transition:Toward Responsive Law (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers), p. xxiv.
3. Alex Wang, “The Search for Sustainable Legitimacy: Environmental Law and Bureaucracy in China”, Harvard Environmental Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 2 (2013), pp. 365-440.
4. Inga Markovits, Justice in Lüritz: Experiencing Socialist Law in East Germany (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010), p. 98.
5. Supreme People’s Court, “Reply of the Supreme People’s Court with Regard to the Report on the Circumstances of Establishing an Environmental Division by the People’s Court of Qiaokou District in Wuhan Municipality” (10 February 1989), reprinted in Chinese Law and Government, Vol. 43, No. 6 (November/ December 2010), pp. 41-42.
6. Lawrence Baum, Specializing the Courts (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011), pp. 32-33
7. Alex L. Wang and Jie Gao, “Environmental Courts and the Development of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China”, Journal of Court Innovation, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2010), p. 47.
8. George Pring and Catherine Pring, Greening Justice: Creating and Improving Environmental Courts and Tribunals (The Access Initiative, 2010), http://tinyurl.com/7z4gnfj, accessed 15 January 2014.
9. Rachel E. Stern, Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 32-35.
10. Exiang Wan, “Establishing an Environmental Public Interest Litigation System and Promoting the Building of an Ecological Civilization” (3 March 2009), re-printed in Chinese Law and Government, Vol. 43, No. 6 (November/December 2010), pp. 30-40.
11. Wen Jiabao, “Zhengfu gongzuo baogao” (Government Work Report), 5 March 2007.
12. Alex Wang, “The Search for Sustainable Legitimacy”, p. 400.
13. Leslie Hook, “China Feels the Strain in Rush to Save Energy”, Financial Times (19 October 2010).
14. Scott Wilson, “Seeking One’s Day in Court: Chinese Regime Responsiveness to International Legal Norms on AIDS Carriers’ and Pollution Victims’ Rights”, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 21, No. 77 (September 2010), pp. 863-80.
15. Rachel E. Stern, Environmental Litigation in China, p. 131.
16. Sebastian Heilmann, “From Local Experiments to National Policy: the Origins of China’s Distinctive Policy Process”, The China Journal, No. 59 (2008), pp. 1-30, 20.
17. Sebastian Heilmann, “Policy-Making Through Experimentation: The Formation of a Distinctive Policy Process”, in Sebastian Heilmann and Elizabeth J. Perry (eds), Mao’s Invisible Hand: The Political Foundations of Adaptive Governance in China (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011), pp. 62-101.
18. Christian Göbel and Thomas Heberer, “Governing By Innovation”, conference paper presented at the 11th European Conference on Agriculture and Rural Development in China (11-13 April 2013), Würzburg, Germany.
19. Sarah Eaton and Genia Kostka, “Authoritarian Environmentalism Undermined? Local Leaders’ Time Horizons and Environmental Policy Implementation”, The China Quarterly (forthcoming).
20. Alex L. Wang and Jie Gao, “Environmental Courts”, p. 40.
21. Yuan Dingbo, “Shui wuran jizhong zhifa ruanlei, huanbao fating chengqi qingshan lüshui baohusan” (Water Pollution Targets Weak Law Enforcement, Environmental Courts Hold up an Umbrella Protecting Natural Beauty), Fazhi ribao (Legal Daily) (3 March 2009), http://tinyurl.com/ykqyds9, accessed 15 January 2014.
22. Wu Hao and Wu Xiaoyang, “Gao yuan mingzhu bian duhu, Yunnan gaoceng fansi jiaoxun” (The Pearl of the Plateau Becomes a Poisoned Lake: Yunnan High-Level Leaders Re-Think a Lesson), Xinhua News Agency (27 October 2008), http://tinyurl.com/6pvu5v6, accessed 15 January 2014.
23. Qie Jianrong, “Huanbao fating weihe zongshi shouming yu weinan zhi shi?” (Why Are Environmental Courts Always Seeking Counsel in Times of Crisis?), Fazhi ribao (6 October 2008), http://tinyurl.com/73p3osg, accessed 16 January 2014.
24. Ma Yong, “Fahui shetuan zuzhi zuoyong, tuidong huanjing gongyi susong” (The Role Social Organizations Can Play in Pushing Forward Environmental Public Interest Litigation), in Chang Jiwen (ed.), Zhongguo huanjing fazhi (Environmental Law in China) (Beijing: Law Press, 2009).
25. Wang Zhiqiu, “Guiyang huanbao fating pin pin liangjian” (The Guiyang Environmental Court Is Frequently a Sharp Sword), Renmin ribao (People’s Daily) (18 May 2013), http://tinyurl.com/ouak4m6, accessed 16 January 2013.
26. Wuxi Intermediate Court, “Wuxishi zhongji renmin fayuan gongzuo baogao” (Wuxi City Intermediate Court Work Report) (19 January 2011).
27. Shi Zongyuan, “Guizhou sheng dishici dangdaihui baogao” (Report of the Tenth Guizhou Provincial Party Congress) (7 May 2009), http://tinyurl.com/7ke2wj8, accessed 15 January 2014.
28. Xinhua News Agency, “Guiyang shengzhang Lin Shusen: baohu zhu qing shan lü shui ye shi zhengji” (Guiyang Governor Lin Shusen: Protecting Nature Is Also a Political Achievement) (25 January 2008), http://tinyurl.com/6vpbp6z, accessed 16 January 2014; 2
29. Joseph Fewsmith, The Logic and Limits of Political Reform in China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 52-67.
30. Bao Yonghui and Xu Taosong, Zhengdao: Qiu He shi nian (The Right Way: 10 Years of Qiu He) (Hangzhou:Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe, 2009), p. 259.
31. Supreme People’s Court, “Zuigao renming fayuan gongzuo baogao” (Supreme People’s Court Work Report) (20 March 2011), http://tinyurl.com/mxz4u3v, accessed 29 January 2014.
32. Robert A. Kagan, “The Organization of Administrative Justice Systems: The Role of Political Mistrust”, in Michael Adler (ed.), Administrative Justice in Context (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010), p. 163.
33. Tang Shihua, “Yunnan fayuan pojie huanjing sifa baohu kunju you zhaoshu” (The Yunnan Court Has a Trick for Breaking Though Difficulties with Environmental Protection Law) (13 June 2011), http://tinyurl.com/cm74ddk, accessed 16 January 2014.
34. Wang Zhiqiu, “Guiyang huanbao fating qidai dapo pingjing” (The Guiyang Environmental Court Looks Forward to Breaking Through a Bottleneck), Renmin ribao (18 September 2008).
35. Yang Kai, " ‘Zhong dou de gua’ de jieguo yu huanbao gongyi susong de kaiduan” (“Plant Beans, Get Melons” and the Start of Environmental Public Interest Litigation), Huanjing ziyuanfa luncong (Environmental Law and Resources Law Review), Vol. 8 (2010), p. 310.
36. Inga Markovits, “Pursuing One’s Rights Under Socialism”, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 38 (1985-86), p. 711.
37. Wang Zhiqiu, “Guiyang huanbao fating pin pin liangjian”.
38. Wu Xiaoyong and Chen Yu, “Kunming chengli huanbao fating” (Kunming Establishes an Environmental Court), Xinhua News Agency (11 December 2008), http://tinyurl.com/c5rgh2n, accessed 16 January 2014.
39. Kunming Intermediate Court et al., “Implementation Opinions”, p. 70.
40. Xiao Jun and Chen Qingxiang, “Dui 2008 nian yilai Guiyang shi fasheng po huanjing ziyuan fanzui qingkuang de fenxi” (Analysis of Environmental and Natural Resource Crimes in Guiyang from 2008 on) (17 December 2010), http://tinyurl.com/a63qo9d, accessed 16 January 2014.
41. Yang Su and Xin He, “Street as Courtroom: State Accommodation of Labor Protest in South China”, Law & Society Review, Vol. 44, No. 1 (2010), p. 181.
42. Scott Wilson, “Seeking One’s Day in Court”, p. 871.
43. Yuan Dingbo, “Shui wuran jizhong zhifa ruanlei, huanbao fating chengqi qingshan lüshui baohusan”.
44. Jonathan Schieber, “Courting Change: Environmental Groups in China Now Have the Ability to Sue Polluters, But Will They?”, The Wall Street Journal (7 December 2009), http://tinyurl.com/ybm7aus, accessed 17 January 2014.
45. Chinese legal scholar Jiang Ping, “Give Law Greater Clout in Battle Against Pollution”, China Daily (31 July 2006), http://tinyurl.com/yz9foaf, accessed 17 January 2014
46. Sun Youhai, “Baozhang jingji zhuanxing weihu huanjing quanyi” (Guaranteeing an Economic Transformation and Protecting Environmental Rights), Zhongguo huanjing bao (China Environment News) (27 August 2010), http://tinyurl.com/bdfpydp, accessed 17 January 2014.
47. Lei Qing, “Kunming nijian huanjing gongyi susong jiuji jijin” (Kunming Plans to Establish an “Environmental Public Interest Litigation Relief Fund), Kunming ribao (Kunming Daily) (5 April 2010), http://tinyurl.com/4u53xht, accessed 17 January 2014.
48. Compiled from Xinhua News Agency, “China Resorts to Judicial Protection”.
49. Jie Gao, “Environmental Public Interest Litigation”.
50. Lei Qing, “Kunming nijian huanjing gongyi susong jiuji jijin”, and Kunming Intermediate Court, “Kunming zhongyuan fabu huanjing sifa baohu lüpishu” (Kunming Intermediate Court Announces Green Paper on Environmental Law) (17 October 2013), http://tinyurl.com/lvpb7rq, accessed 30 January 2014.
51. Chu Wanzhong, “Yunnan sheng gaoyuan diaoyan huanbao fating faxian ganga shi” (An Investigation of the Environmental Courts by the Yunnan High Court Uncovers Embarrassing Problems), Fazhi ribao (18 October 2010), http://tinyurl.com/4hkyt2f, accessed 17 January 2014.
52. “Kunming huanbao fating shouan gao yangzhu qiye” (The Kunming Environmental Protection Court’s First Case Against a Pig-Raising Enterprise), Renmin ribao (24 February 2010), http://tinyurl.com/3hp6yrr, accessed 19 January 2014.
53. Meng Dengke, “Huanbao fating tingzhang: huanjing gongyi susong jidai jilei sifa shijian” (Environmental Court Head: Environmental Public Interest Litigation Urgently Accumulates Practical Experience), Nanfang zhoumou (Southern Weekend) (12 October 2010).
54. Sarah Eaton and Genia Kostka, “Authoritarian Environmentalism Undermined?”.
55. Rachel E. Stern, Environmental Litigation in China, p. 39.
56. Guiyang tongji nianjian (Guiyang Statistical Yearbook) (Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2011), p. 307.
57. Liao Bo, “Qixun laozhe xiefen fanghuo shao shan” (An Old Man Over 70 Set a Hill Fire to Vent His Anger), Guizhou dushi bao (Guizhou Urban News) (8 April 2010), http://tinyurl.com/aaguzkj, accessed 19 January 2014.
58. Guiyang Forestry Bureau, “Guiyang shi renmin zhengfu fabu senlin fanghuo jinhuo ling” (Guiyang City Government Announces Order Banning Fires to Prevent Forest Fires) (3 March 2010).
59. Guiyang Forestry Bureau, “Guiyang shi 2010 nian senlin fanghuo gongzuo anpai yijian” (Guiyang City 2010 Work Plan for Preventing Forest Fires) (2 February 2010).
60. Benjamin L. Liebman, “Leniency in Chinese Criminal Law? Everyday Justice in Henan”. Berkeley Journal of International Law, forthcoming, Fall 2014.
61. Lee Epstein, Jack Knight and Olga Shvetsova, “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government”, Law & Society Review, Vol. 35 (2001), p. 154.
62. Diana Kapiszewski, Gordon Silverstein and Robert A. Kagan, “Introduction”, in Diana Kapiszewski, Gordon Silverstein and Robert A. Kagan (eds), Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in Global Perspective (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2013), p. 34.
63. George Pring and Catherine Pring, Greening Justice, p. 33. Low caseload is not a problem unique to China. On p. 31, 88.
64. Sida Liu, “Beyond Global Convergence: Conflicts of Legitimacy in a Chinese Lower Court”, Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 31, No. 1 (2006), p. 91.
65. Zhu Jingwen, Zhongguo falü fazhan baogao (Report on China Law Development: Database and Indicators) (Beijing: Renmin University Press, 2007), p. 205.
66. Xuehua Zhang, Enforcing Environmental Regulations in Hubei Province, China: Agencies, Courts, Citizens, PhD Dissertation, Stanford University (2008), p. 171.
67. Lawrence Baum, “Specializing the Courts”.