Erratum: Image Quality Ranking Method for Microscopy (Scientific Reports (2016) 6 (28962) DOI: 10.1038/srep28962);Image Quality Ranking Method for Microscopy

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Koho, Sami ^a   Fazeli, Elnaz ^a   Eriksson, John E ^a,b   Hänninen, Pekka E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84976904225     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep30863     Document Type: Erratum

References (36)

1. Bray, M.-A., Fraser, A. N., Hasaka, T. P., Carpenter, A. E. Workflow and Metrics for Image Quality Control in Large-Scale High-Content Screens. J. Biomol. Screen. 17, 266-274 (2012).
2. Redondo, R. et al. Quality evaluation of microscopy and scanned histological images for diagnostic purposes. Micron 43, 334-343 (2012).
3. Paul, P., Kalamatianos, D., Duessmann, H., Huber, H. Automatic quality assessment for fluorescence microscopy images. In 8th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering, doi: 10.1109/BIBE.2008.4696665 (IEEE, 2008).
4. Ljosa, V., Carpenter, A. E. Introduction to the Quantitative Analysis of Two-Dimensional Fluorescence Microscopy Images for Cell-Based Screening. PLos Comput. Biol. 5, e1000603 (2009).
5. Shariff, A., Kangas, J., Coelho, L. P., Quinn, S., Murphy, R. F. Automated Image Analysis for High-Content Screening and Analysis. J. Biomol. Screen. 15, 726-734 (2010).
6. Shamir, L., Delaney, J. D., Orlov, N., Eckley, D. M., Goldberg, I. G. Pattern Recognition Software and Techniques for Biological Image Analysis. PLos Comput Biol 6, e1000974 (2010).
7. Huang, K., Murphy, R. F. From Quantitative Microscopy to Automated Image Understanding. J. Biomed. Opt. 9, 893-912 (2004).
8. Keller, P. J., Schmidt, A. D., Wittbrodt, J., Stelzer, E. H. K. Digital Scanned Laser Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy (DSLM) of Zebrafish and Drosophila Embryonic Development. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011, pdb.prot065839 (2011).
9. Wang, K. et al. Rapid adaptive optical recovery of optimal resolution over large volumes. Nat. Methods 11, 625-628 (2014).
10. Chen, B.-C. et al. Lattice light-sheet microscopy: Imaging molecules to embryos at high spatiotemporal resolution. Science 346, 1257998 (2014).
11. Myers, G. Why bioimage informatics matters. Nat. Methods 9, 659-660 (2012).
12. The quest for quantitative microscopy (Editorial). Nat. Methods 9, 627-627 (2012).
13. Eliceiri, K. W. et al. Biological imaging software tools. Nat. Methods 9, 697-710 (2012).
14. Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., Simoncelli, E. P. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13, 600-612 (2004).
15. Sheikh, H. R., Bovik, A. C. Image information and visual quality. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15, 430-444 (2006).
16. Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C. Reduced-and No-Reference Image Quality Assessment. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 28, 29-40 (2011).
17. Soundararajan, R., Bovik, A. C. RRED Indices: Reduced Reference Entropic Differencing for Image Quality Assessment. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21, 517-526 (2012).
18. Nill, N. B., Bouzas, B. Objective image quality measure derived from digital image power spectra. Opt. Eng. 31, 813-825 (1992).
19. Ferzli, R., Karam, L. J. A No-Reference Objective Image Sharpness Metric Based on the Notion of Just Noticeable Blur (JNB). IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18, 717-728 (2009).
20. Liu, L., Liu, B., Huang, H., Bovik, A. C. No-reference image quality assessment based on spatial and spectral entropies. Signal Process. Image Commun. 29, 856-863 (2014).
21. Narwaria, M., Lin, W. Objective Image Quality Assessment Based on Support Vector Regression. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 21, 515-519 (2010).
22. Narwaria, M., Lin, W. SVD-Based Quality Metric for Image and Video Using Machine Learning. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 42, 347-364 (2012).
23. Moorthy, A. K., Bovik, A. C. Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20, 3350-3364 (2011).
24. Mittal, A., Moorthy, A. K., Bovik, A. C. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21, 4695-4708 (2012).
25. Saad, M. A., Bovik, A. C., Charrier, C. Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21, 3339-3352 (2012).
26. Mittal, A., Soundararajan, R., Bovik, A. C. Making a 'Completely Blind' Image Quality Analyzer. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 20, 209-212 (2013).
27. Li, L. et al. No-Reference Image Blur Assessment Based on Discrete Orthogonal Moments. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 46, 39-50 (2016).
28. Firestone, L., Cook, K., Culp, K., Talsania, N., Preston, K. Comparison of autofocus methods for automated microscopy. Cytometry 12, 195-206 (1991).
29. Brenner, J. F. et al. An automated microscope for cytologic research a preliminary evaluation. J. Histochem. Cytochem. Off. J. Histochem. Soc. 24, 100-111 (1976).
30. Åkerfelt, M. et al. Automated tracking of tumor-stroma morphology in microtissues identifies functional targets within the tumor microenvironment for therapeutic intervention. Oncotarget 6, 30035-30056 (2015).
31. Kankaanpaä, P. et al. BioImageXD: an open, general-purpose and high-throughput image-processing platform. Nat. Methods 9, 683-689 (2012).
32. Carpenter, A. E., Kamentsky, L., Eliceiri, K. W. A call for bioimaging software usability. Nat. Methods 9, 666-670 (2012).
33. Tsai, D.-Y., Lee, Y., Matsuyama, E. Information Entropy Measure for Evaluation of Image Quality. J. Digit. Imaging 21, 338-347 (2008).
34. Gabarda, S., Cristóbal, G. Quality evaluation of blurred and noisy images through local entropy histograms. In Proc. SPIE 6592, Bioengineered and Bioinspired Systems III, 659214, doi: 10.1117/12.721952 (SPIE, 2007).
35. Field, D. J., Brady, N. Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes. Vision Res. 37, 3367-3383 (1997).
36. Sheikh, H. R., Sabir, M. F., Bovik, A. C. A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15, 3440-3451 (2006).