(Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 739-743

  Braun, Virginia ^a   Clarke, Victoria ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84976904188     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588     Document Type: Note

References (23)

1. R.E.Boyatzis, (1998). Transforming qualitative information:Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
2. V.Braun, & V.Clarke, (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77– 101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
3. V.Braun, & V.Clarke, (2013). Successful qualitative research:A practical guide for beginners. London:Sage.
4. D.Byrne, (2015). Response to Fugard and Potts:Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses:A quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 689– 691. 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005455
5. Y.Cedervall, & A.C.Åberg, (2010). Physical activity and implications on well-being in mild Alzheimer’s disease:A qualitative case study on two men with dementia and their spouses. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 26, 226– 239. 10.3109/09593980903423012
6. V.Clarke, & V.Braun, (in press). Applied thematic analysis. In P.Brough & S.Occhipinti (Eds.), Research methods for applied psychologists:Design, analysis and reporting. London:Routledge.
7. L.M.Connelly, & J.N.Peltzer, (2016). Underdeveloped themes in qualitative research:Relationships with interviews and analysis. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 30(1), 51– 57.
8. I.T.Coyne, (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 623– 630. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x
9. L.DeSantis, & D.N.Ugarriza, (2000). The concept of theme as used in qualitative nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22, 351– 372. 10.1177/019394590002200308
10. N.Emmel, (2015). Themes, variables, and the limits to calculating sample size in qualitative research:A response to Fugard and Potts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 685– 686. 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005457
11. A.J.B.Fugard, & H.W.W.Potts, (2015). Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses:A quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 669– 684. 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453
12. G.Guest, A.Bunce, & L.Johnson, (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59– 82. 10.1177/1525822X05279903
13. G.Guest, K.M.MacQueen, & E.E.Namey, (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. 10.4135/9781483384436
14. M.Hammersley, (2015). Sampling and thematic analysis:A response to Fugard and Potts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18, 687– 688. 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005456
15. H.Joffe, (2012). Thematic analysis. In D.Harper & A.R.Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative methods in mental health and psychotherapy:A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 209– 223). Chichester:Wiley.
16. K.Kinsella, & J.Woodall, (2016). ‘Pure bonding time’:Prisoner and staff perceptions of the impact of taking part in a drama project for imprisoned men and their children. Prison Service Journal, 223, 11– 17.
17. A.Madill, A.Jordan, & C.Shirley, (2000). Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis:Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 1– 20. 10.1348/000712600161646
18. K.Malterud, V.D.Siersma, & A.D.Guassora, (2015). Sample size in qualitative interview studies:Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research,. 10.1177/1049732315617444.
19. J.McLeod, (2011). Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy (2nd ed.). London:Sage.
20. J.M.Morse, (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 3– 5. 10.1177/104973200129118183
21. S.Reicher, (2000). Against methodolatry:Some comments on Elliott, Fischer, and Rennie. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 1– 6. 10.1348/014466500163031
22. M.Sandelowski, & J.Leeman, (2012). Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 1404– 1413. 10.1177/1049732312450368
23. S.J.Tracy, (2010). Qualitative quality:Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 837– 851. 10.1177/1077800410383121