Response to Fugard and Potts: supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 689-691

  Byrne, David ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942984899     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005455     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. J.Breckenridge,, & D.Jones,. (2009). Demystifying sampling in grounded theory research. Grounded Theory Review, 8, 2 (Online). Retrieved from http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2009/06/30/847/
2. D.S.Byrne,, & A.Doyle, (2005). The visual and the verbal – the interaction of images and discussion in exploring cultural change. In C.Knowles & P.Sweetman (Eds.), Using visual methods (pp. 166–177). Abingdon: Routledge.
3. B.Glazer, (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
4. A.L.Strauss,, & J.Corbin,. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
5. S.Timmermans,, & I.Tavory, (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30, 167–186.10.1177/0735275112457914
6. J.W.Tukey,. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.