Mobile user experience in augmented reality vs. Maps interfaces: A case study in public transportation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 9768, Issue , 2016, Pages 388-396

  Kamilakis, Manousos ^a   Gavalas, Damianos ^b,d   Zaroliagis, Christos ^c,d  

^a HELLENIC OPEN UNIVERSITY   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

^d University of Patras and Computer Technology Institute   (Greece)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Map interface; Mobile application; Public transportation; User evaluation; User experience

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; MASS TRANSPORTATION; MOBILE COMPUTING; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

MAP INTERFACES; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION; USER EVALUATIONS; USER EXPERIENCE;

AUGMENTED REALITY;

EID: 84976605928     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40621-3_27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., Ivkovic, M.: Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia Tools Appl. 51(1), 341–377 (2011)
2. Jacobson, R.D.: Navigating maps with little or no sight: an audio-tactile approach. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Content Visualization and Intermedia Representations (1998)
3. Nurminen, A., Järvi, J., Lehtonen, M.: A mixed reality interface for real time tracked public transportation. In: Proceedings of the 10th ITS European Congress (2014)
4. Olsson, T., Kärkkäinen, T., Lagerstam, E., Ventä-Olkkonen, L.: User evaluation of mobile augmented reality scenarios. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 4(1), 29–47 (2012)
5. Pielot, M., Boll, S.: Tactile wayfinder: comparison of tactile waypoint navigation with commercial pedestrian navigation systems. In: Floréen, P., Krüger, A., Spasojevic, M. (eds.) Pervasive 2010. LNCS, vol. 6030, pp. 76–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
6. Rehrl, K., Häusler, E., Leitinger, S., Bell, D.: Pedestrian navigation with augmented reality, voice and digital map: final results from an in situ field study assessing performance and user experience. J. Location Based Serv. 8(2), 75–96 (2014)
7. Sarjakoski, L.T., Nivala, A.M.: Adaptation to context-a way to improve the usability of mobile maps. In: Meng, L., Reichenbacher, T., Zipf, A. (eds.) Map-Based Mobile Services, pp. 107–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
8. Setlur, V., Kuo, C., Mikelsons, P.: Towards designing better map interfaces for the mobile: experiences from example. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference and Exhibition on Computing for Geospatial Research & Application (2010)
9. Wen, J., Helton, W.S., Billinghurst, M.: A study of user perception, interface performance, and actual usage of mobile pedestrian navigation aides. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 57(1), 1958–1962 (2013)
10. Yovcheva, Z., Buhalis, D., Gatzidis, C.: Smartphone augmented reality applications for tourism. e-Review Tourism Res. (eRTR) 10(2), 63–66 (2012)