Santa Claus in the fertility clinic

Human Reproduction

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1381-1382

  Evers, J L H Hans ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MALE; MALE INFERTILITY; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 84976573652     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew092     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. ASRM, the practice committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Intracytoplasmic Sperm Inection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1395-1399.
2. Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MP, Shaaban M, Kalaf Y, Seddler M, Ghobara T, Braude P, Kennedy R, Rutherford A, Hartshorne G et al. Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001;357: 2075-2079.
3. Casarett D. The science of choosing wisely-overcoming the therapeutic illusion. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1 203-1 205.
4. Dyer S, Chambers GM, De Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, Banker M, Adamson GD. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies. World report on Assisted Reproductive Technologies: 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod 2016;31:1588-1609.
5. SART. 2016. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. SART Clinic Summary Report 2013; www.sartcorsonline.com (2 April 2016, date last accessed).
6. Thomas KB. The consultation and the therapeutic illusion. BMJ 1978; 1:1327-1328.