International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: Assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010†

Human Reproduction

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1588-1609

  Dyer, S ^a   Chambers, G M ^b   De Mouzon, J ^c   Nygren, K G ^d   Zegers Hochschild, F ^e   Mansour, R ^f   Ishihara, O ^g   Banker, M ^h   Adamson, G D ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c Institut Cochin   (France)

^d KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES   (Chile)

^f EGYPTIAN IVF ET CENTER   (Egypt)

^g SAITAMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^h Nova IVI Fertility   (India)

ⁱ PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Assisted reproductive technology; Frozen embryo transfer; ICMART; IVF ICSI outcome; Multiple births; Registry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASPIRATION; ATTENTION; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CHEMICAL BINDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYOLOGY; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONITORING; ORGANIZATION; REGISTER; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; STUDY DESIGN; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; INFERTILITY THERAPY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RESEARCH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRENDS; UTILIZATION;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; RESEARCH REPORT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84976555206     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew082     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adamson GD. Global cultural and socioeconomic factors that influence access to assisted reproductive technologies. Womens Health 2009; 5:351-358.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2012 Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report. Atlanta, GA: US Dept of Health and Human Services, 2014.
3. Chambers GM, Hoang VP, Sullivan EA, Chapman MG, Ishihara O, Zegers-Hochschild F, Nygren KG, Adamson GD. The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 191-198.e 194.
4. Dyer SJ, Kruger TF. Assisted reproductive technology in South Africa: first results generated from the South African Register of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. South Afr Med J 2012;102:167-170.
5. Dyer SJ, Sherwood K, McIntyre D, Ataguba JE. Catastrophic payment for assisted reproduction techniques with conventional ovarian stimulation in the public health sector of South Africa: frequency and coping strategies. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2755-2764.
6. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Social determinants of human reproduction. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1518-1526.
7. ESHRE CapriWorkshop Group. Failures (with some successes) of assisted reproduction and gamete donation programs. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19:354-365.
8. Hamilton BH, McManus B. The effects of insurance mandates on choices and outcomes in infertility treatment markets. Health Econ 2012; 21:994-1016.
9. Inhorn MC. Right to assisted reproductive technology: overcoming infertility in low-resource countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;106:172-174.
10. Ishihara O, Adamson GD, Dyer S, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Sullivan EA, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies: world report on assisted reproductive technologies, 2007. Fertil Steril 2015;103: 402-413.e11.
11. Lancaster PA. Registers of in-vitro fertilization and assisted conception. Hum Reprod 1996;11(Suppl 4):89-104.
12. Lee E, Illingworth P, Wilton L, Chambers GM. The clinical effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in all 24 chromosomes (PGD-A): systematic review. Hum Reprod 2015;30:473-483.
13. Macaldowie A, Lee E, Chambers GM. Assisted reproduction technology in Australia and New Zeal and 2013. Assisted reproduction technology series no. 18. Sydney: The University of New SouthWales, 2015.
14. Maheshwari A, McLernon D, Bhattacharya S. Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus? Hum Reprod 2015;30:2703-2707.
15. Mansour R, Ishihara O, Adamson GD, Dyer S, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Sullivan E, Zegers-Hochschild F. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2006. Hum Reprod 2014;29:1536-1551.
16. Pandian Z, Marjoribanks J, Ozturk O, Serour G, Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;7:CD003416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub4.
17. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy. Fertil Steril 2012; 97:825-834.
18. Sullivan EA, Wang YA, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Illingworth P, McBain J, Norman RJ. Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study. Hum Reprod 2012;27:3609-3615.
19. van RumsteMM, Evers JL, Farquhar CM. ICSI versus conventional techniques for oocyte insemination during IVF in patients with non-male factor subfertility: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2004; 19:223-227.
20. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, Sullivan E, van der Poel S, on behalf of ICMART and WHO. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod 2009;24: 2683-2687.
21. Zegers-Hochschild F, Dickens BM, Dughman-Manzur S. Human rights to in vitro fertilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013;123:86-89.
22. Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Sullivan EA. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2005. Fertil Steril 2014;101:366-378.