An adaptive approach to monitor the shoreline changes in ICZM framework: A case study of Chennai coast

Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1266-1271

  Kankara, R S ^a   Chenthamil Selvan, S ^a   Rajan, B ^a   Arockiaraj, S ^a  

^a Ministry of Earth Sciences   (India)

Author keywords

Accretion; Erosion; Satellite imagery; Weighted linear regression rate and end point rate

Indexed keywords

ACCRETION; COASTAL MORPHOLOGY; EROSION; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SHORELINE CHANGE;

CHENNAI; INDIA; TAMIL NADU;

EID: 84976524884     PISSN: 25826506     EISSN: 25826727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ordu S and Demir A, Determination of Land Data of Ergene Basin (Turkey) by Planning Geographic Information Systems. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology., 2009. 2:80-87.
2. Malini B H and Rao K N, Coastal erosion and habitat loss along the Godavari delta front-a fallout of dam construction (?).Current Science, 2004. 87 (9):1232-1236.
3. Nayak S, Use Of Satellite Data In Coastal Mapping. Indian Cartographer., 2002. 5.
4. Thieler E R, The Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) version 4.0 an ArcGIS extension for calculating shoreline change. 2009, [Reston, Va.: U.S. Geological Survey].
5. Howarth P J and Wickware G M, Procedures for change detection using Landsat digital data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1981. 2 (3):277-291.
6. Jensen J R, Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. 1995: Prentice Hall PTR. 318.
7. Lillesand T M, Kiefer R W, and Wiley J, Remote Sensing And Image Interpretationin Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 2000, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.736.
8. Crowell M, Leatherman S P, and Buckley M K, Historical Shoreline Change: Error Analysis and Mapping Accuracy. Journal of Coastal Research, 1991. 7 (3):839-852.
9. Thieler E R and Danforth W W, Historical Shoreline Mapping (I): Improving Techniques and Reducing Positioning Errors. Journal of Coastal Research, 1994. 10 (3):549-563.
10. Douglas B C and Crowell M, Long-term shoreline position prediction and error propagation. Journal of Coastal Research, 2000:145-152.
11. Moore L J, Shoreline Mapping Techniques. Journal of Coastal Research, 2000. 16 (1):111-124.
12. Boak E H and Turner I L, Shoreline definition and detection: a review. Journal of Coastal Research, 2005:688-703.
13. Lee J-S and Jurkevich I. Coast line detection and tracing in SAR images. in IEEE Transactions on Geo-Science and Remote Sensing. 1999.
14. Genz A S, Fletcher C H, Dunn R A, Frazer L N, and Rooney J J, The Predictive Accuracy of Shoreline Change Rate Methods and Alongshore Beach Variation on Maui, Hawaii. Journal of Coastal Research, 2007:87-105.
15. Fletcher C, Rooney J, Barbee M, and Lim S-C, Mapping Shoreline Change Using Digital Orthophotogrammetry on Maui, Hawaii, J.o.C. Research, Editor. 2003.
16. Fletcher C H, Romine B M, Genz A S, Barbee M M, Dyer M, Anderson T R, Lim S C, Vitousek S, Bochicchio C, and Richmond B M, National assessment of shoreline change: Historical shoreline change in the Hawaiian Islands. 2012: US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.
17. Romine B M, Fletcher C H, Frazer L N, Genz A S, Barbee M M, and Lim S-C, Historical Shoreline Change, Southeast Oahu, Hawaii; Applying Polynomial Models to Calculate Shoreline Change Rates. Journal of Coastal Research, 2009:1236-1253.
18. Hapke C J, Himmelstoss E A, Kratzmann M G, List J H, and Thieler E, National assessment of shoreline change; historical shoreline change along the New England and Mid-Atlantic coasts. 2010, U. S. Geological Survey.