Investment paradoxes in electricity networks

Springer Optimization and Its Applications

Volumn 17, Issue , 2008, Pages 593-608

  Bjørndal, Mette ^a   Jørnsten, Kurt ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Norway)

Author keywords

Braess paradox; Congested electrical networks; Kirchhoff s junction and loop rules; User equilibrium flows

Indexed keywords

EID: 84976520127     PISSN: 19316828     EISSN: 19316836     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-77247-9_23     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Baldick, R., Kahn, E.: Transmission Planning Issues in a Competitive Economic Environment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 8, 1497-1503 (1993).
2. Bjyrndal, M., Jyrnsten, K.: Zonal Pricing in a Deregulated Electricity Market. The Energy Journal, 22, 51-73 (2001).
3. Braess, D.: Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung, 12, 258-268 (1968).
4. Bushnell, J. B., Stoft, S.: Electric Grid Investment Under a Contract Network Regime. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 10, 61-79 (1996).
5. Bushnell, J. B., Stoft, S.: Improving Private Incentives for Electric Grid Investment. Resource and Energy Economics, 19, 85-108 (1997).
6. Bushnell, J. B., Stoft, S.: Transmission and Generation Investment in a Competitive Electric Power Industry. PWP-030 University of California Energy Institute (1996).
7. Calvert, B., Keady, G.: Braess's Paradox and Power-Law Nonlinearities in Networks. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, Series B Applied Mathematics, 35, 1-22 (1993).
8. Cohen, J. E., Horowitz, P.: Paradoxical Behaviour of Mechanical And Electrical Networks. Letters to Nature, 352, 699-701 (1991).
9. Dafermos, S., Nagurney, A.: On Some Traffic Equilibrium Theory Paradoxes. Transportation Research B, 18, 101-110 (1984).
10. Dubey, P.: Inefficiency of Nash Equilibria. Mathematics of Operations Research, 11, 1-8 (1986).
11. Frank, M.: The Braess Paradox. Mathematical Programming, 20, 283-302 (1981).
12. Hallefjord, Å., Jornsten, K., Storoy, S.: Traffic Equilibrium Paradoxes When Travel Demand Is Elastic. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operations Research, 11, 41-50 (1994).
13. Hogan, W. W.: Market-Based Transmission Investments and Competitive Electricity Markets. Center for Business and Government. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University (1999).
14. Korilis, Y. A., Lazar, A. A., Orda, A.: Avoiding the Braess Paradox in Non-Cooperative Networks. Journal of Applied Probability, 36, 211-222 (1997).
15. Murchland, J. D.: Braess's Paradox of Traffic Flow. Transportation Research, 4, 391-394 (1970).
16. Pas, E. I., Principio, S. L.: Braess' Paradox: Some New Insights. Transportation Research B, 31, 265-276 (1997).
17. Penchina, C. M.: Braess Paradox: Maximum Penalty in a Minimal Critical Network. Transportation Research A, 31, 379-388 (1997).
18. Steinberg, R., Stone, R. E.: The Prevalence of Paradoxes in Transportation Equilibrium Problems. Transportation Science, 22, 231-241 (1988).
19. Steinberg, R., Zangwill, W. I.: The Prevalence of Braess' Paradox. Transportation Science, 17, 301-318 (1983).
20. Stewart, N. F.: Equilibrium Vs System-Optimal Flow: Some Examples. Transportation Research A, 14, 81-84 (1980).
21. Wu, F., Varaiya, P., Spiller, P., Oren, S.: Folk Theorems on Transmission Access: Proofs and Counterexamples. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 10, 5-23 (1996).