Description and validation of a "non path-dependent" model for projecting contrasting urban growth futures

CyberGeo

Volumn 2016, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Houet, Thomas ^a   Aguejdad, Rahim ^b   Doukari, Omar ^c   Battaia, Guillaume ^d   Clarke, Keith ^e  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^c Campus de Cachan ^*  (France)

^d Toulouse Tech Transfer   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Land use and land cover; Model; Scenarios; SLEUTH; Trajectories; Trends vs. contrasting futures

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; FORECASTING METHOD; LAND COVER; LAND USE; MODEL TEST; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PLANNING METHOD; URBAN GROWTH;

EID: 84976384301     PISSN: None     EISSN: 12783366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4000/cybergeo.27397     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Alonso W (1964) Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA, USA).
2. Alcamo J (2008) Environmental futures: the practice of environmental scenario analysis. Developments in Integrated Environmental Assessment-Volume 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam
3. Amer M, Daim TU, Jetter A, 2013, A review of scenario planning. Futures, 46, 23-40.
4. Agarwal C, Green GM, Grove JM, Evans TP, Schweik CM, 2002, A review and assessment of land-use change models: dynamics of space, time and human choice. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-297. http://nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr-ne297.pdf
5. Aguejdad R, Hidalgo J, Doukari O, Masson V, Houet T, 2012, Assessing the influence of long term urban growth on urban climate. 6th International Congress on Environmental Modeling and Software, July 1-5, 2012, at the UFZ in Leipzig, Germany
6. Bishop P, Hines A, Collins T, 2007, The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques, Foresight, 9, 5-25. DOI:10.1108/14636680710727516
7. Brown, D.G., Page, S., Riolo, R., Zellner, M., Rand, W., 2005. Path dependence and the validation of agent-based models of land use. International journal of geographical information science, 19(2), 153-174.
8. Candau J, Rasmussen S, Clarke KC, 2000, A coupled cellular automaton model for land-use / land cover dynamics, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling (GIS/EM4): Problems, Prospects and Research Needs, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2-8 September http://www.colorado.edu/research/cires/banff/pubpapers/94/
9. Candau JC, 2002, Temporal Calibration Sensitivity of the SLEUTH Urban Growth Model. M.A. Thesis. University of California, Santa Barbara.
10. Chaudhuri G, Clarke KC, 2013, The SLEUTH land use change model: A review. The International Journal of Environmental Resources Re search, 1(1), 88-104.
11. Claggett P, Jantz CA, Goetz SJ, Bisland C, 2004, Assessing development pressure in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: An evaluation of two land-use change models. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 94, 129-146 DOI: 10.1023/B: EMAS.0000016884.96098.77
12. Clarke KC, Gaydos L, 1998, Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: Long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 12, 699-714 DOI: 10.1080/136588198241617
13. Clarke KC, Gazulis N, Dietzel CK, Goldstein NC, 2007, A decade of SLEUTHing: Lessons learned from applications of a cellular automaton land use change model. Chapter 16. In: Fisher, P. (ed). Classics from IJGIS. Twenty Years of the International Journal of Geographical Information Systems and Science. Taylor and Francis, CRC. Boca Raton, FL. 413-425
14. Clarke KC, 2008, A Decade of Cellular Urban Modeling with SLEUTH: Unresolved Issues and Problems, Chapter 3. In: Planning Support Systems for Cities and Regions (Ed. Brail, R. K., Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, 47-60, http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/gig/Pub/SLEUTHPapers-Nov24/Clarke-Lincoln2008.pdf
15. Clergeau P, Croci S, Jokimaki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimaki M, Dinetti M, 2006, Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: analysis at different European latitudes. Biological Conservation, 127, 336-344. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.035
16. Dietzel CK, Clarke KC, 2004, Determination of optimal calibration metrics through the use of self-organizing maps. Proceedings of the Integrated Assessment of the Land System Workshop. October 28-30, 2004. Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam
17. Dietzel C, Herold M, Hemphill JJ, Clarke KC, 2005, Spatio-temporal dynamics in California's Central Valley: Empirical links to urban theory. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 19(2), 175-195 DOI: 10.1080/13658810410001713407
18. El Abidine El Morjani Z, Ebener S, Boos J, Abdel Ghaffar E, Musani A, 2007, Modeling the spatial distribution of five natural hazards in the context of the WHO/EMRO Atlas of Disaster Risk as a step towards the reduction of the health impact related to disasters, International Journal of Health Geographics, 6(8)
19. Forys E, Allen CR, 2005, The impacts of sprawl on biodiversity: the ant fauna of the lower Florida Keys. Ecology and Society 10(1), 25, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art25/
20. Gaucherel C, Alleaume S, Hély C, 2008, The Comparison Map Profile method: a strategy for multiscale comparison of quantitative and qualitative images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(9), 2708-2719. DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2008.919379
21. Godet M, 1986, Introduction to 'la prospective': seven key ideas and one scenario method. Futures, 18, 134-157
22. Goldstein NC, 2004, Brains vs. brawn - Comparative strategies for the calibration of a cellular automata-based urban growth model. In: P. Atkinson, G. Foody, S. Darby, and F. Wu., (eds). GeoDynamics, Boca Raton, CRC Press.
23. Goldstein N, Dietzel C, Clarke K, 2005, Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough - Sensitivity Testing Of Monte Carlo Iterations For Model Calibration, Proceedings, 8th International Conference on GeoComputation. http://www.geocomputation.org/2005/Goldstein1.pdf
24. Gusdorf F, Hallegatte S, 2007, Compact or Spread-Out Cities: Urban Planning, Taxation, and the Vulnerability to Transportation Shocks. Energy Policy, 35, 4826-4838 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.017
25. Gusdorf F, Hallegatte S, Lahellec A, 2008, Time and space matter: how urban transitions create inequality. Global Environment Change. 18(4), 708-719 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.06.005
26. Gustafson EJ, 1998, Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? Ecosystems. 1(2), 143-156 DOI: 10.1007/s100219900011
27. Haase D, Shwarz N, 2009, Simulation Models on Human-Nature Interactions in Urban Landscapes: A Review Including Spatial Economics, System Dynamics, Cellular Automata and Agent-based Approaches. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 3(2) http://www.livingreviews.org/lrlr-2009-2 DOI: 10.12942/lrlr-2009-2
28. Houet T, Gaucherel C, 2007, Simulation dynamique et spatialement explicite d'un paysage agricole bocager: Validation sur un petit bassin versant breton sur la période 1981-1998. International Journal of Geomati cs and Spatial Analysis, 17(3-4), 491-516 DOI: 10.3166/geo.17.491-516
29. Houet T, Loveland TR, Hubert-Moy L, Gaucherel C, Napton D, Barnes CA, Sayler KL, 2010, Exploring subtle land use and land cover changes: a framework for future landscape studies, Landscape Ecology, 25(2), 249-266
30. Houet T, Pigeon G, 2011, Mapping urban climate zones and quantifying climate behaviors - An application on Toulouse urban area (France), Environmental Pollution, 159(8-9), 2180-2192 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.12.027
31. Houet T., Schaller N., Castets M., Gaucherel C., (2014) Improving the simulation of fine scale landscape changes coupling top-down and bottom-up land use and cover changes rules. International Journal of Geographical Science, 28(9), 1848-1876
32. Houet T. (2015), Usages de modèles spatiaux pour la prospective, Revue Internationale de Géomatique, Vol. 25/1, pp. 123-143
33. Jantz CA, Goetz SJ, Shelley MK, 2003, Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore/Washington metropolitan area. Environment and Planning B, 31, 251-71 DOI: 10.1068/b2983
34. Jantz CA., Goetz CJ, Donato D, Claggett P, 2010, Designing and implementing a regional urban modeling system using the SLEUTH cellular urban model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34, 1-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.08.003
35. Johnson MP, 2001, Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning A, 33(4), 717-735 DOI: 10.1068/a3327
36. Kolb M, Mas JF, Galicia L, 2013, Evaluating drivers and transition potential models in a complex landscape in southern Mexico. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 27(9), 1804-1827
37. Kok K, Verburg P, Veldkamp T, 2007a, Integrated Assessment of the land system: The future of land use. Land use policy, 24(3), 517-520 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.04.007
38. Kok, K., Biggs, R. and Zurek, M., 2007b. Methods for developing multiscale participatory scenarios: insights from southern Africa and Europe [online]. Ecology and Society, 13(1), 8. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art8/ [Accessed July 2013]
39. Lambin EF, Geist HJ, 2006, Land-Use and Land-Cover Change - Local processes and Global impacts, Global Change - The IGBP Series, Ed. Springer.
40. Landis J.D., 1998, Development and pilot application of the California Urban and Biodiversity Analysis (CURBA) Model, Coll. Monograph, University of California, Berkeley. Institute of Urban & Regional Development, p. 77
41. Mahiny AS, Clarke K, 2012, Guiding SLEUTH land-use / land-cover change modeling using multicriteria evaluation: towards dynamic sustainable land-use planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 39, 925-944 DOI: 10.1068/b37092
42. Marchadier C, Houet T, Bretagne G, 2012, How to define and assess city adaptation strategies? ICUC8 - 8th International Conference on Urban Climate - ICUC 8 and 10th Symposium on the Urban Environment, August 6-10, 2012, Dublin, Ireland.
43. Mas JF, Kolb M, Paegelow M, Camacho Olmedo MT, Houet T, 2014, Modeling Land use / cover changes: a comparison of conceptual approaches and softwares. Environmental Modeling and Software, 51, 94-111
44. Masson V, Gomes L, Pigeon G, Liousse K, Lagouarde JP, Voogt J, Salmond J, Oke T, Legain D, Garrouste O, Tulet P, 2008, The canopy and aerosol particles interactions in Toulouse urban layer (CAPITOUL) experiment. Meteorology and Atm ospheric Physics, 102 (3-4), 135-157.
45. Masson V, Marchadier C, Adolphe L, Aguejdad R, Avner P, Bonhomme M, Bretagne G, Briotter X, Bueno B, de Munck C, Doukari O, Hallegate S, Hidalgo J, Houet T, Lemonsu A, Long N, Moine MP, Morel T, Nolorgues L, Pigeon G, Salagnac JL, Zibouche K, 2014, Adapting Cities to Climate change: a systemic modeling approach, Urban Climate. 10(2), 407-429.
46. McGarigal K, Marks BJ, 1995, FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
47. Mills, E.S. (1967) An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. American Economy Review, 57, 197-210.
48. Muth R.F. (1969) Cities and Housing; the Spatial Pattern of Urban Residential Land Use. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (USA).
49. Onsted JA, 2002, SCOPE: A modification and application of the Forrester Model to the South Coast of Santa Barbara County. Master's Thesis, Department of Geography, University of California - Santa Barbara.
50. Onsted JA, 2007, Effectiveness of the Williamson Act: A Spatial Analysis. PhD Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara.
51. Paegelow M., Camacho Olmedo M.T., Mas J.F., Houet T., (2014) Benchmarking of LUCC modeling tools by various validation techniques and error analysis, Cybergeo, no701, http://cybergeo.revues.org/26610
52. Pontius RG, 2000, Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogrammetric Engineering of Remote Sensing, 66(8), 1011-1016
53. Pontius RG, 2002, Statistical methods to partition effects of quantity and location during comparison of categorical maps at multiple resolutions. Photogrammetric Engineering of Remote Sensing, 68(10), 1041-1049
54. Pontius RG, Boersma W, Castella JC, Clarke K, de Nijs T, Dietzel C, Duan Z, Fotsing E, Goldstein N, Kok K, Koomen E, Lippitt CD, McConnell W, Sood AM, Pijankowski B, Pidhadia S, Sweeney S, Trung TN, Veldkamp AT, Verburg PH, 2008, Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. Annals of Regional Science, 42(1), 11-27
55. Price B, Kienast F, Seidl I, Ginzler C, Verburg P, Bolliger J. (2014) Future landscapes of Switzerland: Risk areas for urbanisation and land abandonment, Applied Geography, 57, 32-41
56. Silva EA, Clarke KC, 2002, Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26, 525-52 DOI: 10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00014-X
57. Solecki WD, Oliveri C, 2004, Downscaling climate change scenarios in an urban land use change model. Journal of Environmental Management, 72, 105-115 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.03.014
58. Suarez-Rubio M, Lookingbill TR, Wainger LA, 2012, Modeling exurban development near Washington, DC, USA: comparison of a pattern-based model and a spatially-explicit econometric model. Landscape Ecology, 27, 1045-1061
59. Tu J, Xia ZG, Clarke K, 2007, Impact of Urban Sprawl on Water Quality in Eastern Massachusetts, USA. Environmental Management, 40(2), 183-200 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-006-0097-x
60. Turner B, Lambin E, Reenberg A, 2007, The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 104(52), 20666-20671
61. United Nations, 2012, World Urbanization Prospects, the 2011 Revision: Highlights. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York, 2012 - http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/pdf/WUP2011-Highlights.pdf
62. Verburg P, Schot P, Djist M, Veldkamp T, 2004, Land use change modeling: current practices and research priorities, GeoJournal, 61(4), 309-324
63. Verburg P, Van Berkel D, Van Doorn A, Van Eupen E, Van den Heiligenberg H, 2010, Trajectories of land use change in Europe: a model-based exploration of rural futures. Landscape Ecology, (25)2, 217-232
64. Verburg P, Eickhout B. and van Meijl H., (2008) A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use, Annals of Regional Science, 42(1) (2008), pp. 57-77 DOI: 10.1007/s00168-007-0136-4
65. Viguié V, Hallegatte S, Rozenberg J, 2014, Downscaling long term socio-economic scenarios at city scale: a case study on Paris, Technological forecasting and social change, 87, 305-324 DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.028
66. Xiang WN, Clarke KC, 2003, The use of scenarios in land - use planning. Environment and Planning B; Planning and Design. 30, 885-909 DOI: 10.1068/b2945
67. Yang X, Lo CP, 2003, Modeling urban growth and landscape change in the Atlanta metropolitan area. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17, 463-488
68. Wack P, 1985a, Scenarios: uncharted waters ahead, Harvard Business Review, 63, 73-89
69. Wack P, 1985b, Scenarios: shooting the rapids, Harvard Business Review, 63, 139-150
70. White R, Engelen G, 1993, Cellular Automata and Fractal Urban Form: A Cellular Modelling Approach to the Evolution of Urban Land Use Patterns. Environment and Planning A, 25, 1175-1199. DOI:10.1068/a251175