Association Between Primary Care Visits and Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the Era of Population Health Outreach

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 1190-1197

  Halm, Ethan A ^a   Beaber, Elisabeth F ^b   McLerran, Dale ^b   Chubak, Jessica ^c   Corley, Douglas A ^d   Rutter, Carolyn M ^e   Doubeni, Chyke A ^f   Haas, Jennifer S ^g   Balasubramanian, Bijal A ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b USA   (United States)

^c GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^e RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^g BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

colorectal cancer screening; population health outreach; primary care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DATA BASE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FECAL IMMUNOCHEMISTRY; FECES ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; IMMUNOCHEMISTRY; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OCCULT BLOOD; OUTREACH PROGRAM; POPULATION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PROPENSITY SCORE; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; AFTERCARE; AMBULATORY CARE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORECTAL TUMOR; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH PROMOTION; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION;

AFTERCARE; AGED; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; OFFICE VISITS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84976271935     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: 15251497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3760-9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):10–29.
2. Bromley EG, May FP, Federer L, Spiegel BM, van Oijen MG. Explaining persistent under-use of colonoscopic cancer screening in African Americans: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2014;71c:40–8.
3. Ferrante JM, Lee JH, McCarthy EP, et al. Primary care utilization and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality among medicare beneficiaries: a population-based, case–control study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(7):437–46.
4. Cokkinides VE, Chao A, Smith RA, Vernon SW, Thun MJ. Correlates of underutilization of colorectal cancer screening among U.S. adults, age 50 years and older. Prev Med. 2003;36(1):85–91.
5. Gupta S, Tong L, Allison JE, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer in a safety-net health care system: access to care is critical and has implications for screening policy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2009;18(9):2373–9.
6. Lopez-Class M, Luta G, Noone AM, et al. Patient and provider factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics serving low-income, urban immigrant Latinos. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23(3):1011–9.
7. May FP, Bromley EG, Reid MW, et al. Low uptake of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans in an integrated Veterans Affairs health care network. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80(2):291–8.
8. Paskett ED, Llanos AA, Young GS, Pennell ML, Lee CJ, Katz ML. Correlates of colorectal cancer screening among residents of Ohio Appalachia. J Community Health. 2013;38(4):609–18.
9. Green BB, Wang CY, Anderson ML, et al. An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 Pt 1):301–11.
10. Gupta S, Halm EA, Rockey DC, et al. Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(18):1725–32.
11. Inadomi JM, Vijan S, Janz NK, et al. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(7):575–82.
12. Verma M, Sarfaty M, Brooks D, Wender RC. Population-based programs for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(6):497–510.
13. McLachlan SA, Clements A, Austoker J. Patients’ experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context—a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(2):137–46.
14. Green LA, Fryer GE Jr, Yawn BP, Lanier D, Dovey SM. The ecology of medical care revisited. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(26):2021–5.
15. Myers RE, Turner B, Weinberg D, et al. Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med. 2004;38(4):375–81.
16. Beaber EF, Kim JJ, Schapira MM, et al. Unifying screening processes within the PROSPR Consortium: a conceptual model for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(6):djv120.
17. Tiro JA, Kamineni A, Levin TR, et al. The colorectal cancer screening process in community settings: a conceptual model for the population-based research optimizing screening through personalized regimens consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2014;23(7):1147–58.
18. Chubak J, Garcia MP, Burnett-Hartman AN, et al. Time to colonoscopy after positive fecal blood test in four U.S. health care systems. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(2):344–50.
19. Adams KF, Johnson EA, Chubak J, et al. Development of an algorithm to classify colonoscopy indication from coded health care data. EGEMS (Washington, DC). 2015;3(1):1171.
20. Lee JK, Jensen CD, Lee A, et al. Development and validation of an algorithm for classifying colonoscopy indication. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(3):575–582.e574.
21. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51.
22. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.
23. Austin PC. A tutorial and case study in propensity score analysis: an application to estimating the effect of in-hospital smoking cessation counseling on mortality. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(1):119–51.
24. Lunceford JK, Davidian M. Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. Stat Med. 2004;23(19):2937–60.
25. SAS 9.4 [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2014.
26. Hughes JR. Motivating and helping smokers to stop smoking. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(12):1053–7.
27. Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(15):1620–5.
28. Ferrante JM, Balasubramanian BA, Hudson SV, Crabtree BF. Principles of the patient-centered medical home and preventive services delivery. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(2):108–16.
29. Doubeni CA, Laiyemo AO, Young AC, et al. Primary care, economic barriers to health care, and use of colorectal cancer screening tests among Medicare enrollees over time. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(4):299–307.
30. Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(4):339–59.
31. Holden DJ, Jonas DE, Porterfield DS, Reuland D, Harris R. Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(10):668–76.