The incessant chattering of texts

Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 13-19

  Cronin, Blaise ^a  

^a Indiana University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975791602     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110308464-004     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Collini, S. (2012). What are universities for?. London: Penguin.
2. Cronin, B. (1981). The need for a theory of citing. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 16-24.
3. Cronin, B. (2005). A hundred million acts of whimsy? Current Science, 89(9), 1505-1509.
4. Cronin, B. (2013). Editorial. The evolving indicator space (iSpace). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(8), 1523-1525.
5. Cronin, B. (2014). The penumbral world of the paratext. In: D. Apollon & N. Desrochers (Eds.). Examining paratextual theory and its applications in digital culture. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 1-6.
6. Cronin, B. & Sugimoto, C. R. (Eds.). (2014). Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Cronin, B. & Sugimoto, C. R. (Eds.). (2015). Scholarly metrics under the microscope: From citation analysis to academic auditing. Medford, NJ: ITI/ASIS&T.
8. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1998). Narrative approach to organization studies. London: Sage.
9. Erickson, T. (2000). Theory theory: A designer’s view. Available online at: http://www.visi.com/ ~snowfall/theorytheory.html
10. Fish, S. (1985). Consequences. In: W. J. T. Mitchell (Ed.). Against theory: Literary studies and the new pragmatism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 106-131.
11. Garfield, E. (1965). Can citation indexing be automated? In: M. E. Stevens, V. E. Giuliano & L. B. Heilprin (Eds.). Statistical association methods for mechanized documentation, Symposium Proceedings, 1964. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards, 189-192.
12. Genette, G. (1997). Palimpsests: literature in the second degree. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.
13. Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7, 113-122.
14. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Hagstrom, W.O. (1982). Gift giving as an organizing principle in science In: B. Barnes & D. Edge (Eds.). Science in context: Readings in the sociology of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 21-34.
16. Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 5-25.
17. Liang, L., Zhong, Z., & Rousseau, R. (2014). Scientists’ referencing (mis)behavior revealed by the dissemination network of referencing errors. Scientometrics, 101(3), 1973-1986.
18. MacRoberts, M. H. & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 342-349.
19. Merton, R. K. (2000). On the Garfield input to the sociology of science: A retrospective collage. In: B. Cronin & H. Barsky Atkins (Eds.). The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, NJ: ITI/ASIS, 435-448.
20. Nelson, C. (1997). Superstars. Academe, 87(1), 38-54.
21. Price, D. J. de Solla (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
22. Ravetz, J. R. (1971). Scientific knowledge and its social problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23. Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.
24. Wouters, P. (1999). Beyond the Holy Grail: From citation theory to indicator theories. Scientometrics, 44(3), 561-580.