Airborne signals of communication in sagebrush: A pharmacological approach

Plant Signaling and Behavior

Volumn 10, Issue 12, 2015, Pages

  Shiojiri, Kaori ^a   Ishizaki, Satomi ^b   Ozawa, Rika ^c   Karban, Richard ^d  

^a RYUKOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

1,8 cineol; Airborne signals; Induced response; Plant communication; Plant volatiles; Sagebrush; caryophyllene

Indexed keywords

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ARTEMISIA; HERBIVORY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ARTEMISIA; HERBIVORY; PLANT LEAVES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

EID: 84975746364     PISSN: 15592316     EISSN: 15592324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2015.1095416     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Heil M, Karban R. Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signals. TREE 2014; 25:137-44.
2. Karban R, Wetzel WC, Shiojiri K, Ishizaki S, Ramirez SR, Blande JD. Deciphering the language of plant communication: volatile chemotypes of sagebrush. New Phytol 2014; 204:380-5; PMID:24920243; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.12887.
3. Degen T, Dillmann C, Marion-Poll F. High genetic variability of herbivore-induced volatile emission within a broad range of maize inbred lines. Plant Physiol 2004; 135:1928-38; PMID:15299140; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.039891.
4. Loughrin JH, Manukian A, Heath RR, Tumlinson JH. Volatiles emitted by different cotton carieties damaged by feeding beet armyworm larvae. J Chem Ecol 1995; 21:1217-27; PMID:24234527; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02228321.
5. Weaver DH, Buteler M, Hofland ML, Runyon JB, Nansen C, Talbert LE, Lamb P, Carlson GR. Cultivar preferences of ovipositing wheat stem sawflies as influenced by the amount of volatile attractant. J Econ Entomol 2009; 102:1009-17; PMID:19610414; http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/029.102.0320.
6. Lou Y, Cheng J. Role of rice volatiles in the foraging behaviour of the predator Cyrtorhinus lividipennis for the rice brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens. Bio-Control 2003; 48:73-86; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021291427256.
7. Halitschke R, Kessler A, Kahl J, Lonenz A, Baldwin IT. Ecophysiological comparison of direct and indirect defenses in Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia 2000; 124:408-17; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420000389.
8. Schuman MC, Heinzel N, Gaquerel E, Svaros A, Baldwin IT. Polymorphism in jasmonate signaling partially accounts for the variety of volatiles produced by Nicotiana attenuata plants in a native population. New Phytol 2009; 183:1134-48; PMID:19538549; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02894.x
9. Hare DJ. Variation in herbivore and methyl jamonateinduced volatiles among genetic lines of Datura wrighii. J Chem Ecol 2007; 33:2028-43; PMID:17960462; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-007-9375-1.
10. Delphia CM, Rohr JR, Stephenson AG, De Moraes CM, Mescher MC. Effects of genetic variation and inbreeding on volatile production in a field population of horsenettle. Inter J Plant Sci 2009; 170:12-20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/593039.
11. Kariyat RR, Mauck KE, De Moraes CM, Stephenson AG, Mescher MC. Inbreeding alters volatile signaling phenotypes and influences tri-trophic interactions in horsenettle (Solanum carolinense L.) Ecol Lett 2012; 15:301-9; PMID:22257268; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01738.x
12. Eller ASD, de Gouw J, Graus M, Monson RK. Variation among different genotypes of hybrid poplar with regard to leaf volatile organic compound emissions. Ecol Appl 2012; 22:1865-75; PMID:23210305; http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/11-2273.1.
13. Arimura G, Ozawa R, Shimoda T, Nishioka T, Boland W, Takabayashi J. Herbivory-induced volatiles elicit defence genes in lima bean leaves. Nature 2000; 406:512-5; PMID:10952311; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35020072.
14. Zebeloa SA, Matsui K, Ozawa R, Maffeia ME. Plasma membrane potential depolarization and cytosolic calcium flux are early events involved in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon) plant-to-plant communication. Plant Sci 2012; 196:93-100; PMID:23017903; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.08.006.
15. Kost C, Heil M. Herbivore-induced plant volatiles induce an indirect defence in neighbouring plants. J Ecol 2006; 94:619-28; PMID:15904867; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01120.x
16. Girón-Calva P, Jorge Molina-Torres J, Heil M. Volatile dose and exposure time impact perception in neighboring plants. J Chem Ecol 2012; 38:226-8; PMID:22327276; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-012-0072-3.
17. Karban R, Shiojiri K, Huntzinger M, McCall AC. Damage-induced resistance in sagebrush: volatiles are key to intra-and interplant communication. Ecology 2006; 87:922-30; PMID:16676536; http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87%5b922: DRISVA%5d2.0.CO;2.
18. Karban R, Shiojiri K, Ishizaki S, Wetzel WC, Evans RY. Kin recognition affects plant communication and defence. Proc R Soc B 2013; 280:20123062; PMID:23407838; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.3062.
19. Ishizaki S, Kubota S, Shiojiri K, Karban R, Ohara M. Development of eight microsatellite markers in big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.). Mol Ecol Res 2010; 10:232-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02796.x
20. Karban R, Baldwin IT, Baxter KJ, Laue G, Felton GW. Communication between plants: induced resistance in wild tobacco plants following clipping of neighboring sagebrush. Oecologia 2000; 125:66-71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00008892.
21. Karban R, Maron J, Felton GW, Ervin G, Eichenseer H. Herbivore damage to sagebrush induces resistance in wild tobacco: evidence for eavesdropping between plants. Oikos 2003; 100:325-32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12075.x
22. Kessler A, Halitschke R, Diezel C, Baldwin IT. Priming of plant defense responses in nature by airborne signaling between Artemisia tridentata and Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia 2006; 148:280-92; PMID:16463175; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0365-8.
23. Kelsey RG, Wright WE, Sneva F, Winward AL, Britton C. The concentration and composition of big sagebrush essential oils from Oregon. Biochem Syst Ecol 1983; 11:353-60; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-1978(83)90036-4.
24. Cloyd RA, Marley KA, Larson RA, Dickinson A, Arieli B. Repellency of naturally occurring volatile alcohols to fungus gnat Bradysia sp. nr. coprophila (Diptera: Sciaridae) adults under laboratory conditions. J Econ Entomol 2011; 104:1633-9; PMID:22066193; http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EC11066.
25. Magiatisa P, Skaltsounisa AL, Chinoua I, Haroutounianb SA. Chemical composition and in-vitro antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of three greek Achillea species. Z Naturforsch C 2002; 57:287-90; PMID:12064728.
26. Hendry ER, Worthington T, Conway BR, Lambert PA. Antimicrobial efficacy of eucalyptus oil and 1,8-cineole alone and in combination with chlorhexidine digluconate against microorganisms grown in planktonic and biofilm cultures. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 64:1219-25; PMID:19837714; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkp362.
27. De Vilela GR, Almeida GS, D’Arce M, Moraes M, Brito J, Silva M, Silva S, Piedade S, Calori-Domingues M, Gloria E. Activity of essential oil and its major compound, 1,8-cineole, from Eucalyptus globulus Labill. against the storage fungi Aspergillus flavus Link and Aspergillus parasiticus speare. J Stored Product R 2009; 45:108-11; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2008.10.006.
28. Li L, Li Z, Yin Z, Wei Q, Jia R, Zhou L, Xu J, Song X, Zhou Y, Du Y, et al. Antibacterial activity of leaf essential oil and its constituents from Cinnamomum longepaniculatum. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014; 7:1721-7; PMID:25126170.
29. Bougatsosa C, Ngassapab O, Runyorob D, Chinoua IB. Chemical composition and in vitro antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of two Helichrysum species from Tanzania. Z Naturforsch 2004; 59:368-72.
30. Taban S, Masoudi Sh, Chalabian F, Delnavaz B, Rustaiyan A. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of the essential oils from flower and leaves of Lagochilus kotschyanus Boiss. A new species from Iran. J Med Plant 2009; 31:58-63.
31. Xiong L, Peng C, Zhou Q, Wan F, Xie X, Guo L, Li X, He C, Dai O. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of essential oils from different parts of Leonurus japonicus Houtt. Molecules 2013; 18:963-73; PMID:23344204; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules18010963.
32. Karban R, Shiojiri K. Self recognition affects plant communication and defense. Ecol Lett 2009; 12:502-6; PMID:19392712; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01313.x
33. Farmer EE, Ryan CA. Interplant communication – airborne methyl jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase inhibitors in plant leaves. PNAS 1990; 87:7713-6; PMID:11607107; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.19.7713.
34. Shiojiri K, Karban R. Seasonality of herbivory and communication between individuals of sagebrush. Arthropod Plant Interact 2008; 2:87-92; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11829-008-9037-4