PeachPy meets Opcodes: Direct machine code generation from python

Proceedings of PyHPC 2015: 5th Workshop on Python for High-Performance and Scientific Computing - Held in conjunction with SC 2015: The International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages

  Dukhan, Marat ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Assembly; Domain specific language; Opcode

Indexed keywords

ASSEMBLY; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; LINUX; PROBLEM ORIENTED LANGUAGES;

ASSEMBLY CODE; CHROMIUM-BASED; DOMAIN SPECIFIC LANGUAGES; INSTRUCTION ENCODING; INSTRUCTION SET; MAC OS X; MACHINE CODES; OPCODE;

HIGH LEVEL LANGUAGES;

EID: 84975744527     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2835857.2835860     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Llvmlite: A lightweight LLVM python binding for writing JIT compilers.
2. llvmpy: Python bindings for LLVM.
3. S. Behnel, R. Bradshaw, C. Citro, L. Dalcin, D. Seljebotn, and K. Smith. Cython: The best of both worlds. Computing in Science Engineering, 13(2):31-39, March-April 2011.
4. J. Dongarra and P. Luszczek. Anatomy of a globally recursive embedded LINPACK benchmark. In High Performance Extreme Computing (HPEC), 2012 IEEE Conference on, pages 1-6, 2012.
5. M. Dukhan. PeachPy: A Python framework for developing high-performance assembly kernels. Proceedings of PyHPC, 2013.
6. M. Dukhan and R. Vuduc. Methods for high-throughput computation of elementary functions. In Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics, pages 86-95. Springer, 2014.
7. A. Friedley, C. Mueller, and A. Lumsdaine. High-performance code generation using CorePy. In Proc. of the 8th Python in Science Conference, pages 23-28, Pasadena, CA USA, 2009.
8. O. Green, M. Dukhan, and R. Vuduc. Branch-avoiding graph algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1460, 2014.
9. M. Klemm and J. Enkovaara. pyMIC: A Python offoad module for the Intel Xeon Phi coprocessor. Proceedings of PyHPC, 2014.
10. A. Klöckner, N. Pinto, Y. Lee, B. Catanzaro, P. Ivanov, and A. Fasih. PyCUDA and PyOpenCL: A scripting-based approach to GPU run-time code generation. Parallel Computing, 38(3):157-174, 2012.
11. C. Lattner and V. Adve. Llvm: A compilation framework for lifelong program analysis & transformation. In Code Generation and Optimization, 2004. CGO 2004. International Symposium on, pages 75-86. IEEE, 2004.
12. T. Malas, A. J. Ahmadia, J. Brown, J. A. Gunnels, and D. E. Keyes. Optimizing the performance of streaming numerical kernels on the IBM Blue Gene/P PowerPC 450 processor. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 27(2):193-209, 2013.
13. T. E. Oliphant. Python for scientific computing. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3):10-20, 2007.
14. D. Sehr, R. Muth, C. Biffe, V. Khimenko, E. Pasko, K. Schimpf, B. Yee, and B. Chen. Adapting software fault isolation to contemporary CPU architectures. In USENIX Security Symposium, pages 1-12, 2010.
15. B. Yee, D. Sehr, G. Dardyk, J. B. Chen, R. Muth, T. Ormandy, S. Okasaka, N. Narula, and N. Fullagar. Native client: A sandbox for portable, untrusted x86 native code. In Security and Privacy, 2009 30th IEEE Symposium on, pages 79-93. IEEE, 2009.