Late Postoperative Complications in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB): Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 193-201

  Osland, Emma ^a,b   Yunus, Rossita M ^g   Khan, Shahjahan ^d   Memon, Breda ^e   Memon, Muhammed A ^c,d,e,f,h  

^a ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b Department of Human Movements and Nutrition ^*  (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^e Sunnybank Obesity Centre   (Australia)

^f BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

bariatric surgery; laparoscopic; meta analysis; Roux en y gastric bypass; sleeve gastrectomy; systematic review

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL ABSCESS; ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DEHYDRATION; DUMPING SYNDROME; EMBASE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; GASTROJEJUNAL STENOSIS; HERNIA; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVENTION STUDY; JEJUNUM ULCER; LAPAROSCOPIC ROUX EN Y GASTRIC BYPASS; LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY RATE; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); OBSTRUCTION DUE TO ADHESION; OUTCOME VARIABLE; PEER REVIEW; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RECURRENT ASPIRATION; RECURRENT ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA; REVIEW; SCISEARCH; SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; STENOSIS; STOMACH BYPASS; STRICTURE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ADVERSE EFFECTS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GASTRECTOMY; GASTRIC BYPASS SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; OBESITY, MORBID; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;

GASTRECTOMY; GASTRIC BYPASS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; OBESITY, MORBID; PATIENT READMISSION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84975728093     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000279     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Organisation for Economic and Cooperation Development. Obesity 2014:1-8. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Obesity-Update-2014.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2015.
2. Yates K. The Growing Cost of Obesity in 2008: Three Years On. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: Access Econ Pty Ltd; 2008:1-8.
3. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:766-781.
4. Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, et al. Obesity and economic health burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011;378:815-825.
5. Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD003641.
6. Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:1-190. 215-357.
7. Borisenko O, Adam D, Funch-Jensen P, et al. Bariatric surgery can lead to net cost savings to health care systems: results from a comprehensive European decision analytic model. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1559-1568.
8. Suter M, Donadini A, Romy S. Laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass: significant long term weight loss, improvement of obesity-related comorbidities and quality of life. Ann Surg. 2011;254:267-273.
9. Miras AD, le Roux CW. Mechanisms underlying weight loss after bariatric surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 10:575-584.
10. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, Greenberg CK, et al. Safety culture and complications after bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2013; 257:260-265.
11. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O'Reilly A, et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1434-1442.
12. Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, et al. Early experience with two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg. 2003; 13:861-864.
13. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1-12.
14. Agresti A. An introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons; 2007.
15. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-188.
16. Doi SAR, Barendregt JJ, Khan S, et al. Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials I: the inverse variance heterogeneity model. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45(pt A): 130-138.
17. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, et al. Methods for Meta-analysis in Medical Research. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2001.
18. Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101-129.
19. Hedges LV. I O Statistical Methods for Meta Analysis. Orlando, FL: Orlando Press; 1985.
20. Higgins JP, Thompson BT. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539-1558.
21. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J. 1997;315:629-634.
22. Huedo-Medina TB, Sanchez-Meca J, Marin-Martinez F, et al. Assessing heterogeneity in meta analysis: statistic or index? Am Psychol Assoc. 2006;11:193-206.
23. Tang JL, Liu JL. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:477-484.
24. Viechtbauer W. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metaphor Package. J Stat Software. 2010;36:1-48. Available at: https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v036i03.
25. Fischer L, Wekerle A-L, Bruckner T, et al. BariSurg trial: sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese patients with BMI 35-60 kg/m. BMC Surg. 2015;15:87.
26. Biter LU, Gadiot RPM, Grotenhuis BA, et al. The Sleeve Bypass Trial: a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing the long term outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass for morbid obesity in terms of excess BMI loss percentage and quality of life. BMC Obes. 2015;2:30.
27. Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Argentou M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the management of patients with BMI. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1650-1656.
28. Peterli R, Borbely Y, Kern B, et al. Early results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS). Ann Surg. 2013;258:690-695.
29. Yang J, Wang C, Cao G, et al. Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with body mass index 28-35 kg/m. BMC Surg. 2015;88:1-7.
30. de Barros F, Setubal S, Martinho JM, et al. Early endocrine and metabolic changes after bariatric surgery in grade III morbidly obese patients: a randomized clinical trial comparing sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2015;13:264-271.
31. Helmio M, Victorzon M, Ovaska J, et al. Comparison of short-term outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled multicenter SLEEVEPASS study with 6-month follow-up. Scand J Surg. 2014;103:175-181.
32. Zhang Y, Zhao H, Cao Z, et al. A randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of morbid obesity in China: a 5-year outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1617-1624.
33. Li J-F, Lai D-D, Lin Z-H, et al. Comparison of the long-term results of roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24: 1-11.
34. Yang X, Yang G, Wang W, et al. A meta-analysis: to compare the clinical results between gastric bypass and sleeve gastrec-tomy for the obese patients. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1001-1010.
35. Zhang Y, Wang J, Sun X, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass for morbid obesity and related complications: a meta-analysis of 21 studies. Obes Surg. 2015;25:19-26.
36. Khalaf Al MM, Thalib L, Doi SAR. Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64: 119-123.
37. Cornell JE, Mulrow CD, Localio R, et al. Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:267-270.
38. Juni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, et al. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA. 1999;282: 1054-1060.