Advance (Meta-) Directives for Patients with Dementia who Appear Content: Learning from a Nationwide Survey

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 294-299

  Schoene Seifert, Bettina ^a   Uerpmann, Anna Lena ^b   Gerß, Joachim ^a   Herr, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b EVANGELISCHES KRANKENHAUS   (Germany)

^c Office of the Advisory Council on the Assessment of Developments in the Health Care System   (Germany)

Author keywords

Advance directive; Best interests; Dementia; Ethical conflict; Precedent autonomy; Treatment refusal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMENTIA; ENTERIC FEEDING; FAMILY ATTITUDE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LEARNING; LIVING WILL; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NURSE; NURSE ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PNEUMONIA; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT REFUSAL; VIGNETTE; COMPLICATION; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MENTAL CAPACITY; PSYCHOLOGY;

ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION MAKING; DEMENTIA; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL COMPETENCY; PHYSICIANS; PNEUMONIA; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84975709090     PISSN: 15258610     EISSN: 15389375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Dworkin R. Life's Dominion 1993, Harper Collins, London.
2. Dresser R. Dworkin on dementia: Elegant theory, questionable policy. Hastings Cent Rep 1995, 25:32-38.
3. Jaworska A. Respecting the margins of agency: Alzheimer's patients and the capacity to value. Philos Public Aff 1999, 28:105-138.
4. Quante M. Precedent autonomy and personal identity. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1999, 4:365-381.
5. McMahan J. The Ethics of Killing. Problems at the Margin of Life 2002, Oxford University Press, New York.
6. Davis J.K. The concept of precedent autonomy. Bioethics 2002, 16:114-133.
7. Sumner L.W. Chapter 5.1. Assisted Death:A Study in Ethics and Law 2011, Oxford University Press, New York.
8. German National Ethics Council. The advance directive: An instrument of self-determination; Opinion: Berlin, Germany: German National Ethics Council; 2005:54-56,65. Available at: . Accessed January 3, 2016. http://www.ethikrat.org/archive/national-ethics-council/opinions.
9. Lemmens C. End-of-life decisions and demented patients. What to do if the patient's current and past wishes are in conflict with each other?. Eur J Health Law 2012, 19:177-186.
10. De Boer M.E., Hertogh C.M., Droes R.M., et al. Advance directives in dementia: Issues of validity and effectiveness. Int Psychogeriatr 2010, 22:201-208.
11. Dening K.H., Jones L., Sampson E.L. Advance care planning for people with dementia: A review. Int Psychogeriatr 2011, 23:1535-1551.
12. Dickinson C., Bamford C., Exley C., et al. Planning for tomorrow whilst living for today: The views of people with dementia and their families on advance care planning. Int Psychogeriatr 2013, 25:2011-2021.
13. Jox R.J., Denke E., Hamann J., et al. Surrogate decision making for patients with end-stage dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012, 27:1045-1052.
14. Hartog C.S., Peschel I., Schwarzkopf D., et al. Are written advance directives helpful to guide end-of-life therapy in the intensive care unit? A retrospective-matched cohort study. J Crit Care 2014, 29:128-133.
15. Vandervoort A., Houttekier D., Van den Block L., et al. Advance care planning and physician orders in nursing home residents with dementia: A nationwide retrospective study among professional caregivers and relatives. J Pain Symptom Manage 2014, 47:245-256.
16. Alzheimer's Society UK. Advance Decisions and Advance Statements. 2014. Available at: . Accessed January 3, 2016. http://www.alzheimers.org.uk/site/scripts/documents_info.php?documentID=143.
17. Royal College of Physicians of London. Concise Guidance to Good Practice: Advance Care Planning. Clinical Standards Department 2009: Number 12. Available at: . Accessed January 3, 2016. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/file/1608/download?token=IaLOpglk.
18. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Chapter 5. In: Dementia: Ethical Issues, 2011. Available at: . Accessed January 3, 2016. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/dementia.
19. Gillick M.R. Rethinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. N Engl J Med 2000, 342:206-210.
20. Sampson E.L., Candy B., Jones L. Enteral tube feeding for older people with advanced dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, (15):CD007209.
21. Ubel P.A., Loewenstein G., Jepson C. Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public. Qual Life Res 2003, 12:599-607.
22. Gillick M.R. Doing the right thing: A geriatrician's perspective on medical care for the person with advanced dementia. J Law Med Ethics 2012, 40:51-56.
23. Jox R., Ach S.J., Schoene-Seifert B. Patientenverfügungen bei Demenz: Der 'natürliche Wille' und seine ethische Einordnung. Dtsch Arztebl 2014, 111:A-394-A-396. Available at:, Accessed January 3, 2016. http://www.aerzteblatt.de/pdf.asp?id=156236.
24. Dresser R. Missing persons: Legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Rutgers Law Rev 1994, 46:609-719.
25. Menzel P.T., Chandler-Cramer C. Advance directives, dementia, and withholding food and water by mouth. Hastings Cent Rep 2014, 44:23-37.
26. Meier C.A., Ong T.D. To feed or not to feed? A case report and ethical analysis of withholding food and drink in a patient with advance dementia. J Pain Symptom Manage 2015, 50:887-890.