The evolution of sex roles in mate searching

Evolution

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 617-624

  Fromhage, Lutz ^a   Jennions, Michael ^b   Kokko, Hanna ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Mating effort; Models simulations; Parental investment; Sex roles

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); MATING BEHAVIOR; MORPHOLOGY; PARENTAL INVESTMENT; REPRODUCTION; SEX ROLE; SPERM;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 84975691074     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12874     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
3. Birkhead, T. R., and A. P. Moller . 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
4. Caswell, H. 1978. A general formula for the sensitivity of population growth rate to changes in life history parameters. Theor. Popul. Biol. 14:215-230.
5. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and G. A. Parker . 1992. Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 67:437-456.
6. Clutton-Brock, T., and A. C. J. Vincent . 1991. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351:58-60.
7. Hammerstein, P., and G. A. Parker . 1987. Sexual selection: games between the sexes. Pp. 119-142 in J. W. Bradbury and B. Anderson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
8. Hardling, R., H. Kokko, and K. E. Arnold . 2003. Dynamics of the caring family. Am. Nat. 161:395-412.
9. Houston, A. I., and J. M. McNamara . 2005. John Maynard Smith and the importance of consistency in evolutionary game theory. Biol. Philos. 20:933-950.
10. Kokko, H., and J. Mappes . 2013. Multiple mating by females is a natural outcome of a null model of mate encounters. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 146:26-37.
11. Kokko, H., and P. Monaghan . 2001. Predicting the direction of sexual selection. Ecol. Lett. 4:159-165.
12. Kokko, H., and B. B. M. Wong . 2007. What determines sex roles in mate searching? Evolution 61:1162-1175.
13. Kokko, H., H. Klug, and M. D. Jennions . 2012. Unifying cornerstones of sexual selection: operational sex ratio, Bateman gradient and the scope for competitive investment. Ecol. Lett. 15:1340-1351.
14. McElreath, R., and R. Boyd . 2007. Mathematical models of social evolution: a guide for the perplexed. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
15. Orr, T. J., and P. L. R. Brennan . 2015. Sperm storage: distinguishing selective processes and evaluating criteria. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30:261-272.
16. Pen, I., and F. J. Weissing . 2000. Towards a unified theory of cooperative breeding: the role of ecology and life history re-examined. Proc. R. Soc. B 267:2411-2418.
17. Simmons, L. W. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
18. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pp. 1871-1971 in B. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, IL.