An Empirical Comparison of Joint and Stratified Frameworks for Studying G × E Interactions: Systolic Blood Pressure and Smoking in the CHARGE Gene-Lifestyle Interactions Working Group

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 404-415

  Sung, Yun Ju ^a   Winkler, Thomas W ^b   Manning, Alisa K ^c,d   Aschard, Hugues ^e   Gudnason, Vilmundur ^f,g   Harris, Tamara B ^h   Smith, Albert V ^f,g   Boerwinkle, Eric ^i,j   Brown, Michael R ⁱ   Morrison, Alanna C ⁱ   Fornage, Myriam ^i,k   Lin, Li An ^k   Richard, Melissa ^k   Bartz, Traci M ^l,m   Psaty, Bruce M ^l,n   Hayward, Caroline ^o   Polasek, Ozren ^p,q   Marten, Jonathan ^o   Rudan, Igor ^q   Feitosa, Mary F ^r   Kraja, Aldi T ^r   Province, Michael A ^r   Deng, Xuan ^s   Fisher, Virginia A ^s   Zhou, Yanhua ^s   Bielak, Lawrence F ^t   Smith, Jennifer ^t   Huffman, Jennifer E ^o   Padmanabhan, Sandosh ^q,u   Smith, Blair H ^q,v   Ding, Jingzhong ^w   Liu, Yongmei ^w   Lohman, Kurt ^w   Bouchard, Claude ^x   Rankinen, Tuomo ^x   Rice, Treva K ^a   Arnett, Donna ^y   Schwander, Karen ^a   Guo, Xiuqing ^z   Palmas, Walter ^aa   Rotter, Jerome I ^z   Alfred, Tamuno ^ab   Bottinger, Erwin P ^ab   Loos, Ruth J F ^ab   Amin, Najaf ^ac   Franco, Oscar H ^ac   van Duijn, Cornelia M ^ac   Vojinovic, Dina ^ac   Chasman, Daniel I ^e,ad   Ridker, Paul M ^e,ad   Rose, Lynda M ^ad   Kardia, Sharon ^t   Zhu, Xiaofeng ^ae   Rice, Kenneth ^l,m   Borecki, Ingrid B ^r,ah   Rao, Dabeeru C ^a   Gauderman, W James ^af   Cupples, L Adrienne ^s,ag   more..

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^c BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^f ICELANDIC HEART ASSOCIATION   (Iceland)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^h NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^j BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

ⁿ CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^p UNIVERSITY OF SPLIT   (Croatia)

^q UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^r WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^s BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^t UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^u UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^v UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^w WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^x PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^y UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^z HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^aa NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^ab MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^ac ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^ad BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^ae CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^af UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^ag FRAMINGHAM HEART STUDY   (United States)

^ah REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

gene environment interaction; low frequency variants; meta analysis

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY STUDY; FILTRATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HUMAN; JOINT; LIFESTYLE; META ANALYSIS; SAMPLE SIZE; SMOKING; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE; COHORT ANALYSIS; FACTUAL DATABASE; FAMILY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PHENOTYPE;

BLOOD PRESSURE; COHORT STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FAMILY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; SMOKING;

EID: 84975485972     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21978     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aschard H, Hancock DB, London SJ, Kraft P. 2010. Genome-wide meta-analysis of joint tests for genetic and gene-environment interaction effects. Hum Hered 70(4):292–300.
2. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, van Duijn CM. 2007. GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23(10):1294–1296.
3. Aulchenko YS, Struchalin MV, van Duijn CM. 2010. ProbABEL package for genome-wide association analysis of imputed data. BMC Bioinformatics 11:134.
4. Behrens G, Winkler TW, Gorski M, Leitzmann MF, Heid IM. 2011. To stratify or not to stratify: power considerations for population-based genome-wide association studies of quantitative traits. Genet Epidemiol 35(8):867–879.
5. Browning BL, Browning SR. 2009. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Am J Hum Genet 84(2):210–223.
6. de Bakker PI, Ferreira MA, Jia X, Neale BM, Raychaudhuri S, Voight BF. 2008. Practical aspects of imputation-driven meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Hum Mol Genet 17(R2):R122–R128.
7. Devlin B, Roeder K. 1999. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 55(4):997–1004.
8. Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP. 2013. Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 14(6):379–389.
9. Genomes Project Consortium, Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, DePristo MA, Durbin RM, Handsaker RE, Kang HM, Marth GT, McVean GA. 2012. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491(7422):56–65.
10. Halekoh U, Hojsgaard S, Yan J. 2006. The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Softw 15(2):1–11.
11. Howie B, Fuchsberger C, Stephens M, Marchini J, Abecasis GR. 2012. Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing. Nat Genet 44(8):955–959.
12. Howie BN, Donnelly P, Marchini J. 2009. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet 5(6):e1000529.
13. Hunter DJ. 2005. Gene-environment interactions in human diseases. Nat Rev Genet 6(4):287–298.
14. International Consortium for Blood Pressure Genome-Wide Association Studies, Ehret GB, Munroe PB, Rice KM, Bochud M, Johnson AD, Chasman DI, Smith AV, Tobin MD, Verwoert GC and others. 2011. Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk. Nature 478(7367):103–109.
15. Kraft P, Yen YC, Stram DO, Morrison J, Gauderman WJ. 2007. Exploiting gene-environment interaction to detect genetic associations. Hum Hered 63(2):111–119.
16. Le Marchand L, Wilkens LR. 2008. Design considerations for genomic association studies: importance of gene-environment interactions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(2):263–267.
17. Li Y, Willer CJ, Ding J, Scheet P, Abecasis GR. 2010. MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes. Genet Epidemiol 34(8):816–834.
18. Ma C, Blackwell T, Boehnke M, Scott LJ, Go TDi. 2013. Recommended joint and meta-analysis strategies for case-control association testing of single low-count variants. Genet Epidemiol 37(6):539–550.
19. Magi R, Lindgren CM, Morris AP. 2010. Meta-analysis of sex-specific genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol 34(8):846–853.
20. Manning AK, LaValley M, Liu CT, Rice K, An P, Liu Y, Miljkovic I, Rasmussen-Torvik L, Harris TB, Province MA and others. 2011. Meta-analysis of gene-environment interaction: joint estimation of SNP and SNP x environment regression coefficients. Genet Epidemiol 35(1):11–18.
21. Manning AK, Hivert MF, Scott RA, Grimsby JL, Bouatia-Naji N, Chen H, Rybin D, Liu CT, Bielak LF, Prokopenko I and others. 2012. A genome-wide approach accounting for body mass index identifies genetic variants influencing fasting glycemic traits and insulin resistance. Nat Genet 44(6):659–669.
22. Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, McCarthy MI, Ramos EM, Cardon LR, Chakravarti A and others. 2009. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461(7265):747–753.
23. Marchini J, Howie B. 2010. Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet 11(7):499–511.
24. Newton-Cheh C, Johnson T, Gateva V, Tobin MD, Bochud M, Coin L, Najjar SS, Zhao JH, Heath SC, Eyheramendy S and others. 2009. Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure. Nat Genet 41(6):666–676.
25. Prokopenko I, Langenberg C, Florez JC, Saxena R, Soranzo N, Thorleifsson G, Loos RJ, Manning AK, Jackson AU, Aulchenko Y and others. 2009. Variants in MTNR1B influence fasting glucose levels. Nat Genet 41(1):77–81.
26. Psaty BM, O'Donnell CJ, Gudnason V, Lunetta KL, Folsom AR, Rotter JI, Uitterlinden AG, Harris TB, Witteman JC, Boerwinkle E and others. 2009. Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium: design of prospective meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies from 5 cohorts. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2(1):73–80.
27. Randall JC, Winkler TW, Kutalik Z, Berndt SI, Jackson AU, Monda KL, Kilpelainen TO, Esko T, Magi R, Li S and others. 2013. Sex-stratified genome-wide association studies including 270,000 individuals show sexual dimorphism in genetic loci for anthropometric traits. PLoS Genet 9(6):e1003500.
28. Shungin D, Winkler TW, Croteau-Chonka DC, Ferreira T, Locke AE, Magi R, Strawbridge RJ, Pers TH, Fischer K, Justice AE and others. 2015. New genetic loci link adipose and insulin biology to body fat distribution. Nature 518(7538):187–196.
29. Sitlani CM, Rice KM, Lumley T, McKnight B, Cupples LA, Avery CL, Noordam R, Stricker BH, Whitsel EA, Psaty BM. 2015. Generalized estimating equations for genome-wide association studies using longitudinal phenotype data. Stat Med 34(1):118–130.
30. Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, Kraft P. 2011. On the robustness of tests of genetic associations incorporating gene-environment interaction when the environmental exposure is misspecified. Epidemiology 22(2):257–261.
31. Thomas D. 2010. Gene–environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches. Nat Rev Genet 11(4):259–272.
32. Tobin MD, Sheehan NA, Scurrah KJ, Burton PR. 2005. Adjusting for treatment effects in studies of quantitative traits: antihypertensive therapy and systolic blood pressure. Stat Med 24(19):2911–2935.
33. Voorman A, Lumley T, McKnight B, Rice K. 2011. Behavior of QQ-plots and genomic control in studies of gene-environment interaction. PLoS One 6(5):e19416.
34. Willer CJ, Speliotes EK, Loos RJ, Li S, Lindgren CM, Heid IM, Berndt SI, Elliott AL, Jackson AU, Lamina C and others. 2009. Six new loci associated with body mass index highlight a neuronal influence on body weight regulation. Nat Genet 41(1):25–34.
35. Willer CJ, Li Y, Abecasis GR. 2010. METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics 26(17):2190–2191.
36. Winkler TW, Day FR, Croteau-Chonka DC, Wood AR, Locke AE, Magi R, Ferreira T, Fall T, Graff M, Justice AE and others. 2014. Quality control and conduct of genome-wide association meta-analyses. Nat Protoc 9(5):1192–1212.
37. Winkler TW, Kutalik Z, Gorski M, Lottaz C, Kronenberg F, Heid IM. 2015. EasyStrata: evaluation and visualization of stratified genome-wide association meta-analysis data. Bioinformatics 31(2):259–261.
38. Zeileis A. 2006. Object-oriented computation of sandwich estimators. J Stat Softw 16(9).