The human-computer system: Towards an operational model for problem solving

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 2016-March, Issue , 2016, Pages 1446-1455

  Ribarsky, William ^a   Fisher, Brian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; VISUALIZATION;

ANALYTIC REASONINGS; AUTOMATED ANALYSIS; COMPUTER MODELING; EFFECTIVE SYSTEMS; HUMAN-COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE VISUALIZATIONS; OPEN-ENDED PROBLEMS; VISUAL ANALYTICS SYSTEMS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84975475845     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2016.183     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. R Chang, M Ghoneim, R Kosara, W Ribarsky, J Yang, E Suma, C Ziemkiewicz, D Kern, and A Sudjianto. WireVis: Visualization of Categorical, Time-Varying Financial Transaction Data. IEEE VAST 2007, p 155-162.
2. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row.
3. W. Dou, D. Jeong, F. Stukes, W. Ribarsky, H. Lipford, and R. Chang. Recovering the Reasoning Process from User Interactions. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications. Vol. 29 (3), pp. 52-61 (2009).
4. W. Dou, I. Cho, E. Sauda, and W. Ribarsky. VAiRoma: A Visual Analytics System for Making Sense of Places, Times, and Events in Roman History. To be published. IEEE VAST 2015.
5. Elm, W., Potter, S., Tittle, J., Woods, D., Grossman, J., and Patterson, E. (2005). Finding decision support requirements for effective intelligence analysis tools. HFES 2005, pp. 297-301, 2005.
6. B. Fisher, T. M. Green, and R. Arias-Hernandez, "Visual Analytics as a Translational Cognitive Science, " Topics in Cognitive Science, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 609-625, Apr. 2011.
7. W.-T. Fu and P. Pirolli, "SNIF-ACT: A Cognitive Model of User Navigation on the World Wide Web, " Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 355-412, 2007.
8. M. Gahegan. Beyond Tools: Visual Support for the Entire Process of GIScience, in Exporing Geovisualization, Elsevier, 2005, p. 83.
9. W. D. Gray, C. R. Sims, W.-T. Fu, and M. J. Schoelles. The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, vol. 113 (3), pp. 461-482, 2006.
10. T. Green and W. Ribarsky. Using a Human Cognition Model in the Creation of Collaborative Knowledge Visualizations. Proceedings of SPIE (Defense & Security Conference 2008), Vol. 6983, pp. C1-C10.
11. T. Green, W. Ribarsky, and B. Fisher. Building and Applying a Human Cognition Model for Visual Analytics. Info. Vis. Journal, Vol. 8, pp. 1-13 (2009).
12. T. M. Green and B. Fisher. Towards the Personal Equation of Interaction: The impact of personality factors on visual analytics interface interaction. IEEE VAST 2010, pp. 203-210.
13. M. Hayhoe. Vision Using Routines: A Functional Account of Vision. Visual Cognition, vol. 7 (1), pp. 43-64, Jan. 2000.
14. A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram. Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, pp. 75-105, 2004
15. A. R. Hevner. A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian journal of information systems, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1-6, 2007.
16. S. Hoober and E. Berkman. Designing Mobile Interfaces. O'Reilly (2011).
17. E. Hutchins. "Cognition in the Wild. " MIT Press, Cambridge MA (Bradford Books) 1996.
18. L. T. Kaastra and B. Fisher Field experiment methodology for pair analytics. Proc. Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization, pp 152-159. ACM Digital Library 2014.
19. J. Lehrer. The eureka hunt: Why do good ideas come to us when they do The New Yorker, pp. 40-45, July, 2008.
20. D. Luo, J. Yang, M. Krstajic, J. Fan, W. Ribarsky, and D. Keim. EventRiver: Interactive visual exploration of constantly evolving text collections. IEEE Trans. On Vis. and Comp. Graph. Vol. 18 (1), pp. 93-105 (2010).
21. L. McNamara. Panel: How Field Studies Can Contribute to Visualization and Visual Analytics. SPIE VDA 2015.
22. A. Newell. Unified Theories of Cognition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityPress), 1990.
23. Pirolli P and Card S. The Sensemaking Process and Leverage Points for Analyst Technology as Identified Through Cognitive Task Analysis. Proc. of International Conference on Intelligence Analysis 2005: 2-4.
24. Z. W. Pylyshyn, "The Role of Cognitive Architecture in Theories of Cognition. In, " Architectures for intelligence. K. VanLehn (Ed.), Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. 1991.
25. Z. W. Pylyshyn, J. Burkell, B. Fisher, and C. Sears. Multiple Parallel Access in Visual Attention. Canadian Journal of Exp. Psychology, 48 (2), pp. 260-83. 1994.
26. R. A. Rensink, "Change detection., " Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 245-277, 2002.
27. W. Ribarsky, B. Fisher, and W. Pottenger. The Science of Analytical Reasoning. Information Visualization Journal, Vol 8, pp. 254-262 (2009).
28. D. Sacha, A. Stoffel, F. Stoffel, B. Kwon, G. Ellis, and D. Keim. Knowledge generation model for visual analytics. IEEE Trans. On Vis. and Comp. Graph. Vol. 20 (12), pp1604-1613 (2014).
29. Y. B. Srinivasan and J. J. van Wijk. Supporting the Analytical Reasoning Process in Information Visualization. Proceedings CHI 2008, pp. 1237-1246.
30. J. Stasko, C. Gorg, and Z. Liu. Jigsaw: Supporting Investigative Analysis through Interactive Visualization. Information Visualization, 7 (2), pp. 118-132, 2008.
31. J. J. Thomas and K. A. Cook. Illuminating the Path. Chapter 2. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
32. USSOCOM. Technology Scouting Project with the US Special Operations Command (2015).
33. Karl Weick. Sensemaking in organizations. Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
34. J. J. van Wijk. The value of visualization. IEEE Visualization, Proceedings of Vis 05, p. 79-86. (2005).