Towards the personal equation of interaction: The impact of personality factors on visual analytics interface interaction

VAST 10 - IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology 2010, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 203-210

  Green, Tear Marie ^a   Fisher, Brian ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cognition and perception theory; Embodied cognition; Visual analytics; Visualization taxonomies and models

Indexed keywords

COGNITION AND PERCEPTION THEORY; COMPLETION TIME; EMBODIED COGNITION; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; INTERACTIVE VISUALIZATIONS; INTERFACE INTERACTION; LEARNING PERFORMANCE; LOCUS OF CONTROL; PERSONAL EQUATIONS; PROCEDURAL LEARNING; RESULTS ANALYSIS; VISUAL ANALYTICS; WEB TABLES;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; TAXONOMIES;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 78650943519     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/VAST.2010.5653587     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. P.C. Wong and J. Thomas. Visual analytics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications,. 4(5). 20-21. Sept.-Oct. 2004.
2. G. Gigerenzer and D.G. Goldstein. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of Bounded Rationality. Psychological Review. 103(4): 650-669. 1996.
3. H.A. Simon. Cognitive architectures and rational analysis: Comment. In K. VanLehn (Ed.), Architectures for intelligence . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 25-39. 1991.
4. V. Kaptelinin and B.A. Nardi. Acting with technology activity theory and interaction design, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2006.
5. R.E. Boyatzis and D.A. Kolb. From learning styles to learning skills: the executive skills profile. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 10(5): 3-17. 1995
6. P.P. Heppner and W.P. Anderson, The relationship between problem solving self-appraisal and psychological adjustment. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 9: 415-427. 1984.
7. A. Macia. Visual perception of landscapes: Sex and personality differences. Our national landscape: A conference on applied techniques for analysis and management of the visual resource, General Technical Report PSW-35: 279-85. 1979.
8. J. Palmer. Scientists and information: II. Personal factors in information behavior. Journal of Documentation. 3:254-275. 1991.
9. K.E. Stanovich. Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Erlbaum. Mahwah, NJ. (1999)
10. T.M. Green, D.H. Jeong, and B. Fisher. Using personality factors to predict interface learning performance. Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 43, January 5-8, Koloa, Kauai, Hawaii. USA. 2010.
11. P.R. Pintrich, R.W. Roeser, De ReGroot, and A.M. Elisabeth. Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents' motivation and self-regulated learning. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 14(2): 139-161. 1994.
12. J.B. Rotter, Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs (80), Whole No. 609. 1966.
13. Heuer, R. J. The Psychology of intelligence analysis. Center for the Study of Intelligence. Center for the Study of Intelligence, CIA: Washington, DC. 1999.
14. R. Sun, E. Merrill, and T. Peterson. From implicit skills to explicit knowledge : a bottom-up model of skill learning. Cognitive Science. 25: 203-244. 2001.
15. J.R. Anderson. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review. 89(4): 369-406. 1982.
16. C. Plaisant The challenge of information visualization evaluation. Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Gallipoli, Italy, 2004.
17. R.H. Hall, T.R. Rocklin, T.R. Dnsereau, S.F. Skaggs, P. Lisa, A.M. O'Donnell, J.G. Lambiotte, and M.D. Young. The role of individual differences in the cooperative learning of technical material. Journal of Educational Psychology. 80(2): 172-178. 1988.
18. R. Chang C. Ziemkiewicz, T.M. Green, and W. Ribarsky. Defining insight for visual analytics. Visualization Viewpoint, Computer Graphics & Applications 29(2):14-17. 2009.
19. J. Hong, D. H. Jeong, C. D. Shaw, W. Ribarsky, M. Borodovsky, and C. Song, GVis: A Scalable Visualization Framework for Genomic Data Proceedings of IEEE EuroVis, 2005, 191-198.
20. M.B, Donnellan, F.L. Oswald, B.M. Baird, and R.E. Lucas. The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment (18),:192-203. 2006.
21. N. Krause, Stress and coping: Reconceptualizing the role of locus of control beliefs. Journal of Gerontology, 41(5): 617-622. 1986.
22. H. Weiss and J. Sherman, Internal-external control as a predictor of task effort and satisfaction subsequent to failure Journal of Applied Psychology. 57(2): 132-136. 1973.
23. T.A. Judge, A. Erez, J.E. Bono, and C.J. Thoresen. Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(3): 693-710. 2002.
24. S. B. Messer. The relation in internal-external control to academic performance. Child Development, 43(4). 1972. 1456-1462.
25. C. North. Toward measuring visualization insight. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 26: 6-9. 2006.