Is This Information Source Commercially Biased? How Contradictions Between Web Pages Stimulate the Consideration of Source Information

Discourse Processes

Volumn 53, Issue 5-6, 2016, Pages 430-456

  Kammerer, Yvonne ^a   Kalbfell, Eva ^a   Gerjets, Peter ^a  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975231567     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2016.1169968     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. S.Barzilai,, & Y.Eshet-Alkalai, (2015). The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints. Learning and Instruction, 36, 86–103.
2. C.H.Björnsson, (1968). Läsbarhet [Readability]. Stockholm, Sweden: Liber.
3. J.L.G.Braasch,, R.M.McCabe,, & F.Daniel, (in press). Content integration across multiple documents reduces memory for sources. Reading and Writing.
4. J.L.G.Braasch,, J.-F.Rouet,, N.Vibert,, & M.A.Britt, (2012). Readers' use of source information in text comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 40, 450–465.
5. I.Bråten,, L.E.Ferguson,, H.I.Strømsø,, & Ø.Anmarkrud, (2014). Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a science issue: Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 58–85.
6. I.Bråten,, L.Salmerón,, & H.I.Strømsø, (n.d.). Who said that? Investigating the plausibility-induced source focusing assumption with Norwegian undergraduate readers. Unpublished data.
7. M.A.Britt,, & J.-F.Rouet, (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In J.R.Kirby & M.J.Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 276–314). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8. R.Bromme,, D.Kienhues,, & T.Porsch, (2010). Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) attained from others. In L.D.Bendixen & F.C.Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 163–193). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. G.De Pereyra,, S.Belkadi,, L.Marbach,, & J.-F.Rouet, (2014). Do teenage readers use source information when faced with discrepant information? Presented at the 24th annual meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse. Chicago, IL, August 4–6, 2014.
10. G.De Pereyra,, M.A.Britt,, J.L.G.Braasch,, & J.F.Rouet, (2014). Readers' memory for information sources in simple news stories: Effects of text and task features. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 187–204.
11. K.A.Ericsson,, & H.A.Simon, (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. S.Fox, (2006). Online health search 2006. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2006/PIP_Online_Health_2006.pdf.pdf.
13. S.Fox,, & M.Duggan, (2013). Health online 2013. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/PIP_HealthOnline.pdf.
14. P.Gerjets,, Y.Kammerer,, & B.Werner, (2011). Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data. Learning and Instruction, 21, 220–231.
15. S.R.Goldman,, J.L.G.Braasch,, J.Wiley,, A.C.Graesser,, & K.Brodowinska, (2012). Comprehending and learning from Internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 356–381.
16. J.K.Kaakinen,, & J.Hyönä, (2005). Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eyetracking, and recalls. Discourse Processes, 40, 239–257.
17. Y.Kammerer,, I.Bråten,, P.Gerjets,, & H.I.Strømsø, (2013). The role of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs in laypersons' source evaluations and decisions during Web search on a medical issue. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1193–1203.
18. Y.Kammerer,, & P.Gerjets, (2014). Quellenbewertungen und Quellenverweise beim Lesen und Zusammenfassen wissenschaftsbezogener Informationen aus multiplen Webseiten [Source evaluations and source references when reading and summarizing science-related information from multiple web pages]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 42, 7–23.
19. T.Lucassen,, R.Muilwijk,, M.L.Noordzij,, & J.M.Schraagen, (2013). Topic familiarity and information skills in online credibility evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 254–264.
20. J.K.Ransley,, J.K.Donnelly,, & N.W.Read, (2012). Food and nutritional supplements: their role in health and disease. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
21. J.-F.Rouet,, L.Le Bigot,, G.de Pereyra,, & M.A.Britt, (in press). Whose story is this? Discrepancy triggers readers' attention to source information in short narratives. Reading and Writing.
22. C.Scharinger,, Y.Kammerer,, & P.Gerjets, (2015). Pupil dilation and EEG alpha frequency band power reveal load on executive functions for link-selection processes during text reading. PLoS One, 10, e0130608.
23. L.Scharrer,, R.Bromme,, M.A.Britt,, & M.Stadtler, (2012). The seduction of easiness: How science depictions influence laypeople's reliance on their own evaluation of scientific information. Learning and Instruction, 22, 231–243.
24. W.Schneider,, M.Schlagmüller,, & M.Ennemoser, (2007). LGVT 6–12—Lesegeschwindigkeits und -verständnistest für die Klassen 6–12 [LGVT 6–12—A test for the assessment of reading-speed and -comprehension for high school students]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
25. J.R.Sparks,, & D.N.Rapp, (2011). Readers' reliance on source credibility in the service of inference generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 230–247.
26. M.Stadtler,, & R.Bromme, (2014). The content–source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D.N.Rapp & J.L.G.Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379–402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. H.I.Strømsø,, I.Bråten,, & M.A.Britt, (2011). Do students' beliefs about knowledge and knowing predict their judgment of texts' trustworthiness? Educational Psychology, 31, 177–206.
28. H.I.Strømsø,, I.Bråten,, M.A.Britt,, & L.E.Ferguson, (2013). Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 176–203.
29. A.Walraven,, S.Brand-Gruwel,, & H.P.A.Boshuizen, (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers and Education, 52, 234–246.
30. J.Wiley,, S.R.Goldman,, A.C.Graesser,, C.A.Sanchez,, I.K.Ash,, & J.A.Hemmerich, (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1060–1106.