Validity of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and the Quickdash when used in Dupuytren's disease

Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 589-599

  Rodrigues, J N ^a   Zhang, W ^b   Scammell, B ^b   Russell, P ^c   Chakrabarti, I ^d   Fullilove, S ^e   Davidson, D ^f   Davis, T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL DERBY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d ROTHERHAM GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e DERRIFORD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f ST JOHN'S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

agreement; correlation; DASH; Dupuytren's contracture; Dupuytren's disease; hand function; Patient reported outcome measures; QuickDASH; validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISABILITY; DUPUYTREN CONTRACTURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; UPPER LIMB; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DUPUYTREN CONTRACTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84975057091     PISSN: 17531934     EISSN: 20436289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1753193415601350     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akhavani MA, McMurtrie A, Webb M, Muir L,. A review of the classification of Dupuytren's disease. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015, 40: 155-65.
2. Ball C, Pratt AL, Nanchahal J,. Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren's disease: A systematic review and recommendations for future practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013, 14: 131.
3. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN,. Development of the QuickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005, 87: 1038-46.
4. Beaudreuil J, Allard A, Zerkak D, et al. Unite Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) scale: Development and validation of a tool to assess Dupuytren's disease-specific disability. Arthrit Care Res. 2011, 63: 1448-55.
5. Bland JM, Altman DG,. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986, 1: 307-10.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG,. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med. 1990, 20: 337-40.
7. Budd HR, Larson D, Chojnowski A, Shepstone L,. The QuickDASH score: A patient-reported outcome measure for Dupuytren's surgery. J Hand Ther. 2011, 24: 15-20.
8. Cattell RB,. The scree test for the number of factors. Mutlivar Behav Res. 1966, 1: 245-76.
9. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA,. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998, 23: 575-87.
10. Darzi A,. High quality care for all: NHS Next Stage Review final report. London: TSO, 2008. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-085825 (27th 2012).
11. Degreef I, Vererfve PB, De Smet L,. Effect of severity of Dupuytren contracture on disability. Scand J Plast Recons. 2009, 43: 41-2.
12. Department of Health. Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. London: Department of Health, 2010. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-117353 (26th 2012).
13. Dias JJ, Rajan RA, Thompson JR,. Which questionnaire is best? The reliability, validity and ease of use of the Patient Evaluation Measure, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Michigan Hand Outcome Measure. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 9-17.
14. Engstrand C, Boren L, Liedberg GM,. Evaluation of activity limitation and digital extension in Dupuytren's contracture three months after fasciectomy and hand therapy interventions. J Hand Ther. 2009, 22: 21-6.
15. Ferguson E, Cox T,. Exploratory factor analysis: A users' guide. Int J Select Assess. 1993, 1: 84-94.
16. Floyd FJ, Widaman KF,. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assessment. 1995, 7: 286-99.
17. Forget NJ, Jerosch-Herold C, Shepstone L, Higgins J,. Psychometric evaluation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) with Dupuytren's contracture: Validity evidence using Rasch modeling. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014, 15: 361.
18. Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Pascariello B, Ferriero G,. Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH): A factor analysis and Rasch validation study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010, 91: 1370-7.
19. Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I,. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): Validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006, 7: 44.
20. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011, 20: 1727-36.
21. Horn JL,. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1965, 30: 179-85.
22. Hueston JT,. Principles of management. In: Hueston JT, (Ed.) Dupuytren's contracture. London, E & S Livingstone, 1963: 76-94.
23. Jerosch-Herold C, Shepstone L, Chojnowski A, Larson D,. Severity of contracture and self-reported disability in patients with Dupuytren's contracture referred for surgery. J Hand Ther. 2011, 24: 6-10.
24. Kaiser HF,. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974, 39: 31-6.
25. Kennedy C, Beaton D, Solway S, McConnell S, Bombardier C,. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). The DASH and QuickDASH Outcome Measure User's Manual, 3rd Edn. Toronto, Institute for Work and Health, 2011.
26. Macey AC, Burke FD, Abbott K, et al. Outcomes of hand surgery. British Society for Surgery of the Hand. J Hand Surg Br. 1995, 20: 841-55.
27. Mohan A, Vadher J, Ismail H, Warwick D,. The Southampton Dupuytren's Scoring Scheme. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014, 48: 28-33.
28. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010, 10: 22.
29. NICE. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE, 2008. http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/devnicetech/technologyappraisalprocessguides/?domedia=1&mid=B52851A3-19B9-E0B5-D48284D172BD8459 (26th 2012).
30. Niekel MC, Lindenhovius AL, Watson JB, Vranceanu AM, Ring D,. Correlation of DASH and QuickDASH with measures of psychological distress. J Hand Surg Am. 2009, 34: 1499-505.
31. Norman G,. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010, 15: 625-32.
32. Packham T,. Clinical commentary in response to: Severity of contracture and self-reported disability in patients with Dupuytren's contracture referred for surgery. J Hand Ther. 2011, 24: 12-4.
33. Pallant J,. Manipulating the data. In: SPSS Survival Manual, 4th Edn. Maidenhead, Open University Press, 2010: 74-84.
34. Patil VH, Singh SN, Mishra S, Donovan TD,. Parallel Analysis Engine to Aid Determining Number of Factors to Retain [Computer Software]. 2007. http://smishra.faculty.ku.edu/parallelengine.htm (2nd 2014).
35. Pratt AL, Byrne G,. The lived experience of Dupuytren's disease of the hand. J Clin Nurs. 2009, 18: 1793-802.
36. Rodrigues JN, Zhang W, Scammell BE, Davis TR,. Dynamism in Dupuytren's contractures. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014a, 40: 166-70.
37. Rodrigues JN, Zhang W, Scammell BE, Davis TR,. What patients want from the treatment of Dupuytren's disease-is the Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) scale relevant? J Hand Surg Eur. 2014b, 40: 150-4.
38. Schuck P,. Assessing reproducibility for interval data in health-related quality of life questionnaires: Which coefficient should be used? Qual Life Res. 2004, 13: 571-86.
39. Tesio L,. Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med. 2003, 35: 105-15.
40. Trickett RW, Savage R, Logan AJ,. Angular correction related to excision of specific cords in fasciectomy for Dupuytren's disease. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014, 39: 472-6.
41. Verheyden JR,. Early outcomes of a sequential series of 144 patients with Dupuytren's contracture treated by collagenase injection using an increased dose, multi-cord technique. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015, 40: 133-40.
42. von Campe A, Mende K, Omaren H, Meuli-Simmen C,. Painful nodules and cords in Dupuytren disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2012, 37: 1313-8.
43. Zyluk A, Jagielski W,. The effect of the severity of the Dupuytren's contracture on the function of the hand before and after surgery. J Hand Surg Br. 2007, 32: 326-9.