The southampton dupuytren's scoring scheme

Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 28-33

  Mohan, Arvind ^a   Vadher, Jane ^a   Ismail, Hiba ^a   Warwick, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dupuytren's contracture; Quick DASH; Southampton Dupuytren's scoring scheme

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISABILITY; DUPUYTREN CONTRACTURE; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY;

DISABILITY EVALUATION; DUPUYTREN CONTRACTURE; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84892629774     PISSN: 2000656X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.794349     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). Am J Industrial Med 1996;29: 602-8.
2. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Wright JG. Development of the Quick-DASH: comparison of three item reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1038-46.
3. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg 1998;23A:575-87.
4. Macey AC, Burke FD. Outcomes of hand surgery. J Hand Surg 1995;20B:841-55.
5. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:1585-92.
6. Amadio PC, Berquist TH, Smith DK, et al. Scaphoid malunion. J Hand Surg 1989;14A:679-87.
7. Bindra RR, Dias JJ, Heras-Palau C, et al. Assessing outcome after hand surgery: the current state. J Hand Surg 2003;28B: 289-94.
8. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998;2:i-iv; 1-74.
9. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990;28: 632-42.
10. Cronbach L. Coefficient Alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297-333.
11. Lü Y, Fang J. Advanced medical statistics. World Scientific Publishing 2003;1st Ed;217-18.
12. Beaudreuil J, Allard A, Zerkak D, et al. Unite Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) scale: development and validation of a tool to assess Dupuytren's disease-specific disability. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:1448-55.
13. http://www.icf-research-branch.org/icf-core-sets-projects/ otherhealth-conditions/development-of-icf-core-sets-for-hand-conditions.html. accessed 3 November 2012.
14. Degreef I, Vererfve PB, De Smet L. Effect of severity of Dupuytren contracture on disability. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2009;43:41-2.
15. Engstrand C, Borén L, Liedberg GM. Evaluation of activity limitation and digital extension in Dupuytren's contracture three months after fasciectomy and hand therapy interventions. J Hand Ther 2009;22:21-7.
16. Zyluk A, Jagielski W. The effect of the severity of the Dupuytren's contracture on the function of the hand before and after surgery. J Hand Surg Eur 2007; 32:326-9.
17. Draviaraj KP, Chakrabarti I. Functional outcome after surgery for Dupuytren's contracture: a prospective study. J Hand Surg 2004;29A:804-8