Risk and responsibility

Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 877-907

  Van De Poel, Ibo ^a   Fahlquist, Jessica Nihlén ^a,b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974804320     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_35     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Arendt H (1965) Eichmann in Jerusalem: a report on the banality of evil. Viking, New York
2. Aristotle (ed) (2000) Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
3. Asveld L, Roeser S (eds) (2009) The ethics of technological risk. Earthscan, London
4. Beck U (1992) Risk society; towards a new modernity. Sage, London
5. Berlin I (1958) Two concepts of liberty. Clarendon, Oxford
6. Bohman J, RehgW(1997) Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
7. Boudon R (1981) The logic of social action. An introduction to sociological analysis. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
8. Bradbury JA (1989) The policy implications of differing concepts of risk. Sci Technol Hum Values 14(4):380-399. doi:10.1177/016224398901400404
9. Braham M, van Hees M (2010) An anatomy of moral responsibility, manuscript. Available at http://www.rug.nl/staff/martin.van.hees/MoralAnatomy.pdf
10. Caney S (2005) Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and climate change. Leiden J Int Law 18(4):747-775
11. Caney S (2010) Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Crit Rev Int Soc Polit Philos 13(1):203-228
12. Copp D (2007) The collective moral autonomy thesis. J Soc Philos 38(3):369-388. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00386.x
13. Covello VT, Merkhofer MW (1993) Risk assessment methods. Approaches for assessing health and environmental risks. Plenum, New York
14. Covello VT, McCallum DB, Pavlova MT, Task force on environmental cancer and heart and lung disease (U.S.) (1989) Effective risk communication: the role and responsibility of government and nongovernment organizations, vol 4, Contemporary issues in risk analysis. Plenum, New York
15. CranorCF (1993)Regulating toxic substances.Aphilosophy of science and the law, Environmental ethics and science policy series. Oxford University Press, New York
16. Davis M (1998) Thinking like an engineer. Studies in the ethics of a profession. Oxford University Press, New York
17. Davis M (forthcoming) '‘Ain’t no one here but us social forces’': constructing the professional responsibility of engineers. Sci Eng Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9225-3
18. DoornN(2010) A Rawlsian approach to distribute responsibilities in networks. Sci Eng Ethics 16(2):221-249
19. Doorn N (2011) Moral responsibility in R&D networks. A procedural approach to distributing responsibilities. Simon Stevin Series in the Philosophy of Technology, Delft
20. DouglasM(1985) Risk acceptability according to the social sciences, vol 11, Social research perspectives: occasional reports on current topics. Russell Sage, New York
21. Douglas HE (2009) Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh
22. Douglas M, Wildavsky AB (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley
23. Elster J (1998) Deliberative democracy. Cambridge studies in the theory of democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
24. FerrettiM(2010) Risk and distributive justice: the case of regulating new technologies. Sci Eng Ethics 16(3):501-515. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9172-z
25. Fischer JM, Ravizza M(1998) Responsibility and control: a theory of moral responsibility. Cambridge studies in philosophy and law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
26. Frankfurt H (1969) Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. J Philos 66:829-839
27. French PA (1984) Collective and corporate responsibility. Columbia University Press, New York
28. Garvey J (2008) The ethics of climate change. Right and wrong in a warming world. Continuum, London
29. Giddens A (1999) Risk and responsibility. Modern Law Rev 62(1):1-10
30. Gilbert M (1989) On social facts. International library of philosophy. Routledge, London
31. Habermas J (1990) Moral consciousness and communicative action. Studies in contemporary German social thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
32. Hansson SO (2008) Risk. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition)
33. Hansson SO (2009) Risk and safety in technology. In: Meijers A (ed) Handbook of the philosophy of science. Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences, vol 9. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1069-1102
34. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243-1248
35. Harris CE, Pritchard MS, Rabins MJ (2008) Engineering ethics. Concepts and cases, 4th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont
36. Hart HLA (1968) Punishment and responsibility: essays in the philosophy of law. Clarendon, Oxford
37. Hindriks F (2009) Corporate responsibility and judgement aggregation. Econ Philos 25:161-177
38. Hunter TA (1997) Designing to codes and standards. In: Dieter GE, Lampman S (eds) ASM handbook, vol 20, Materials selection and design., pp 66-71
39. Hursthouse R (2000) On virtue ethics. Oxford Univesity Press, Oxford
40. IEGMP (2000) Mobile phones and health (The Stewart report). Independent Expert Group onMobile Phones
41. International ProgramonChemical Safety (2004) IPCS risk assessment terminology, vol 1, Harmonization project document.World Health Organisation, Geneve
42. Johnson BB (1999) Ethical issues in risk communication: continuing the discussion. Risk Anal 19(3):335-348
43. Johnson BL (2003) Ethical obligations in a tragedy of the commons. Environ Values 12(3):271-287
44. Jungermann H (1996) Ethical dilemmas in risk communication. In: Messick M, Tenbrunsel AE (eds) Codes of conduct. Behavioral research into business ethics. Russell Sage, New York, pp 300-317
45. Lewis HD (1948) Collective responsibility. Philosophy 24(83):3-18
46. Martin MW, Schinzinger R (2005) Ethics in engineering, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston
47. May L (1996) The socially responsive self. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
48. Miller S (2007) Against the collective moral autonomy thesis. J Soc Philos 38(3):389-409. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00387.x
49. Miller S (2010) The moral foundations of social institutions: a philosophical study. Cambridge University Press, New York
50. Morgan MG, Lave L (1990) Ethical considerations in risk communication practice and research. Risk Anal 10(3):355-358
51. National Research Council (1983) Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
52. Nihlén Fahlquist J (2006) Responsibility ascriptions and vision zero. Accid Anal Prev 38:1113-1118
53. Nihlén Fahlquist J (2009) Moral responsibility for environmental problems-individual or institutional? J Agric Environ Ethics 22(2):109-124. doi:10.1007/s10806-008-9134-5
54. NSPE (2007) NSPE code of ethics for engineers. National Society of Professional Engineers, USA, http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html. Accessed 10 September 2010
55. Pettit P (2007) Responsibility incorporated. Ethics 117:171-201
56. Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York
57. Rawls J (1999 [1971]) A theory of justice, Revised edn. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
58. Rayner S (1992) Cutural theory and risk analysis. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social theories of risk. Praeger, Westport, pp 83-115
59. Renn O (1992) Concepts of risk: a classification. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social theories of risk. Praeger, Westport, pp 53-79
60. Roeser S (2006) The role of emotions in the moral acceptability of risk. Saf Sci 44:689-700
61. Roeser S (2007) Ethical intuitions about risks. Saf Sci Monit 11(3):1-13
62. Shrader-Frechette KS (1991a) Reductionist approaches to risk. In: Mayo DG, Hollander RD (eds) Acceptable evidence; science and values in risk management. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 218-248
63. Shrader-Frechette KS (1991b) Risk and rationality. Philosophical foundations for populist reform. University of California Press, Berkeley
64. Shue H (1999) Global environment and international inequality. Int Aff 75(3):531-545
65. Sinnott-Armstrong W (2005) It’s not my fault: global warming and individual moral obligations. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W, Howarth RB (eds) Perspectives on climate change science, economics, politics, ethics. Elsevier/JAI, Amsterdam, pp 285-307
66. Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan, London
67. Stern PC, Feinberg HV (1996) Understanding risk. Informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academy Press, Washington
68. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven
69. Thompson DF (1980) Moral responsibility and public officials: the problem of many hands. Am Polit Sci Rev 74(4):905-916
70. Thompson PB, Dean W (1996) Competing conceptions of risk. Risk Environ Health Saf 7:361-384
71. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453-458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683
72. United Nations (1992) Rio declaration on environment and development
73. United Nations (1998) Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change
74. Van de Poel I (2011) The relation between forwardlooking and backward-looking responsibility. In: Vincent N, Van de Poel I, Van den Hoven J (eds) Moral responsibility. Beyond free will and determinism. Springer, Dordrecht
75. Van de Poel I, Royakkers L (2011) Ethics, technology and engineering. Wiley-Blackwell
76. Van de Poel I, Van Gorp A (2006) The need for ethical reflection in engineering design the relevance of type of design and design hierarchy. Sci Technol Hum Values 31(3):333-360
77. Van de Poel I, Zwart SD (2010) Reflective equilibrium in R&D Networks. Sci Technol Hum Values 35(2):174-199
78. Van Hooft S (2006) Understanding virtue ethics. Acumen, Chesham
79. Wallace RJ (1994) Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
80. Weimer DL (ed) (1995) Institutional design. Kluwer, Boston
81. Williams G (2008) Responsibility as a virtue. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 11(4):455-470
82. Wolff J (2006) Risk, fear, blame, shame and the regulation of public safety. Econ Philos 22(03):409-427. doi: doi:10.1017/S0266267106001040