The impact of social conditions on patient adherence to pulmonary tuberculosis treatment

International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 948-954

  Choi, H ^a,b   Chung, H ^c   Muntaner, C ^d   Lee, M ^a   Kim, Y ^a   Barry, C E ^e   Cho, S N ^a,f  

^a International Tuberculosis Research Center   (South Korea)

^b Korean Institute of Tuberculosis   (South Korea)

^c Korea University   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

^f Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Adherence; Infectious Epidemiology; Loss To Follow Up; Socio Economic Position; Tb

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; BUILDING INDUSTRY; CONSTRUCTION WORKER; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT STATUS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOUSING; HUMAN; LOSS TO FOLLOW UP; LUNG TUBERCULOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMOKING; SOCIAL STATUS; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; EMPLOYMENT; HEALTH PROMOTION; MEDICATION COMPLIANCE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; SOUTH KOREA; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

TUBERCULOSTATIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANTITUBERCULAR AGENTS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HOUSING; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL CONDITIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUBERCULOSIS, PULMONARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84974678889     PISSN: 10273719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0759     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report, 2014. WHO/HTM/TB/2014.08. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2014.
2. Addington W W. Patient compliance: The most serious remaining problem in the control of tuberculosis in the United States. Chest 1979; 76: 741-743.
3. Volmink J, Garner P. Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of strategies to promote adherence to tuberculosis treatment. BMJ 1997; 315: 1403-1406.
4. World Health Organzation, Stop TB Partnership. Global Plan to Stop TB: 2011-2015. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2010.
5. Naidoo P, Peltzer K, Louw J, Matseke G, McHunu G, Tutshana B. Predictors of tuberculosis (TB) and antiretroviral (ARV) medication non-Adherence in public primary care patients in South Africa: A cross sectional study. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 396.
6. Rocha M, Pereira S, Ferreira L, Barros H. The role of adherence in tuberculosis HIV-positive patients treated in ambulatory regimen. Eur Respir J 2003; 21: 785-788.
7. Gelmanova I Y, Keshavjee S, Golubchikova V T, et al. Barriers to successful tuberculosis treatment in Tomsk, Russian Federation: non-Adherence, default and the acquisition of multidrug resistance. Bull World Health Organ 2007; 85: 703-711.
8. Cayla J A, Rodrigo T, Ruiz-Manzano J, et al. Tuberculosis treatment adherence and fatality in Spain. Respir Res 2009; 10: 121.
9. Xu W G, Lu W, Zhou Y, Zhu L M, Shen H B, Wang J M. Adherence to anti-Tuberculosis treatment among pulmonary tuberculosis patients: A qualitative and quantitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9: 169.
10. Mishra R, Hansen E H, Sabroe S, Kafle K K. Socio-economic status and adherence to tuberculosis treatment: A case-control study in a district of Nepal. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005; 9: 1134-1139.
11. World Health Organization. Adherence to long-Term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2003.
12. Garrido M D, Penna M L, Perez-Porcuna T M, et al. Factors Associated with tuberculosis treatment default in an endemic area of the Brazilian Amazon: A case control study. PLOS ONE 2012; 7: e39134.
13. Marx FM, Dunbar R, Hesseling A C, Enarson D A, Fielding K, Beyers N. Increased risk of default among previously treated tuberculosis cases in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2012; 16: 1059-1065.
14. Li J H, Munsiff S S, Tarantino T, Dorsinville M. Adherence to treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in a clinical population in New York City. Int J Infect Dis 2010; 14: E292-E297.
15. Obuku E A, Meynell C, Kiboss-Kyeyune J, et al. Sociodemographic determinants and prevalence of tuberculosis knowledge in three slum populations of Uganda. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 536.
16. Al-Hajjaj M S, Al-Khatim I M. High rate of non-compliance with anti-Tuberculosis treatment despite a retrieval system: A call for implementation of directly observed therapy in Saudi Arabia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2000; 4: 345-349.
17. Muller A. Education, income inequality, and mortality: A multiple regression analysis. BMJ 2002; 324: 23-25.
18. Tachibanaki T. Education, occupation and earnings: A recursive approach for France. Eur Econ Rev 1980; 13: 103-127.
19. Thomson H, Petticrew M, Morrison D. Health effects of housing improvement: systematic review of intervention studies. BMJ 2001; 323: 187-190.
20. Bergel F S, Gouveia N. Frequent return as a novel strategy for tuberculosis treatment adherence. Revista de Saude Publica 2005; 39: 898-905.
21. Kliiman K, Altraja A. Predictors and mortality associated with treatment default in pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2010; 14: 454-463.
22. Bhagat V M, Gattani P L. Factors affecting tuberculosis retreatment defaults in Nanded, India. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2010; 41: 1153-1157.
23. Finlay A, Lancaster J, Holtz T H, Weyer K, Miranda A, van der Walt M. Patient-And provider-level risk factors associated with default from tuberculosis treatment, South Africa, 2002: A casecontrol study. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 56.
24. Khan M A, Walley J D, Witter S N, Shah S K, Javeed S. Tuberculosis patient adherence to direct observation: results of a social study in Pakistan. Health Policy Plan 2005; 20: 354-365.
25. Martins N, Grace J, Kelly P M. An ethnographic study of barriers to and enabling factors for tuberculosis treatment adherence in Timor Leste. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2008; 12: 532-537.
26. Naidoo P, Dick J, Cooper D. Exploring tuberculosis patients adherence to treatment regimens and prevention programs at a public health site. Qual Health Res 2009; 19: 55-70.
27. Muntaner C, OCampo P J. A critical appraisal of the demand/control model of the psychosocial work environment: epistemological, social, behavioral and class considerations. Soc Sci Med 1993; 36: 1509-1517.
28. World Health Organization. Treatment of tuberculosis: guidelines. 4th ed. WHO/HTM/TB/2009.420. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2010.
29. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis: 2011 update. WHO/HTM/TB/2011.6. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2011.
30. McDonald R J, Memon A M, Reichman L B, et al. Successful supervised ambulatory management of tuberculosis treatment failures. Ann Intern Med 1982; 96: 297.
31. Munro S, Lewin S, Swart T, et al. A review of health behaviour theories: how useful are these for developing interventions to promote long-Term medication adherence for TB and HIV/AIDS? BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 104-119.
32. CockerhamWC. Health lifestyle theory and the convergence of agency and structure. J Health Soc Behav 2005; 46: 51-67.
33. Bhargava A, Pai M, Bhargava M, Marais BJ, Menzies D. Can social interventions prevent tuberculosis? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186: 442-449.