Frequent return as a novel strategy for tuberculosis treatment adherence;Retornos freqüentes como nova estratégia para adesão ao tratamento de tuberculose

Revista de Saude Publica

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 898-905

  Bergel, Fernando Skazufka ^a,c   Gouveia, Nelson ^b  

^a Secretaria Municipal da Saúde de Ubatuba   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Directly observed therapy; National health programs; Patient acceptance of health care; Patient Dropouts; Treatment refusal; Tuberculosis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CHI SQUARE TEST; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; RISK REDUCTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUBERCULOSIS CONTROL; UNEMPLOYMENT; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; APPOINTMENTS AND SCHEDULES; BRAZIL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DIRECTLY OBSERVED THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RISK FACTORS; TUBERCULOSIS, PULMONARY;

EID: 33646114287     PISSN: 00348910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0034-89102005000600005     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Alvarez-Gordillo GC, Alvarez-Gordillo JF, Dorantes-Jiménez JE, Halperin-Frisch D. Percepciones y prácticas relacionadas con la tuberculosis y la adherencia al tratamiento en Chiapas, México. Salud Pública Méx 2000;42(6):520-8.
2. Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. The risk of determining risk with multivariable models. Ann Intern Med 1993;118(3):201-10.
3. Deheinzelin D, Takagaki TY, Sartori AMC, Leite OHM, Amato Neto V, Carvalho CRR. Fatores preditivos de abandono de tratamento por pacientes com tuberculose. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med São Paulo 1996;51(4):131-5.
4. Ferrer X, Kirschbaum A, Toro J, Jadue J, Muñoz M, Espinoza A. Adherencia al tratamiento de la tuberculosis del adulto em Santiago, Chile. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam 1991;111(5):423-31.
5. Lima MB, Mello DA, Morais APP, Silva WC. Estudo de casos sobre abandono de tratamento da tuberculose: avaliação do atendimento, percepçāo e conhecimentos sobre a doença na perspectiva dos clientes (Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil). Cad Saúde Pública 2001;17(4):877-85.
6. Menzies R, Rocher I, Vissandjee B. Factors associated with compliance in the treatment of tuberculosis. Tuber Lung Dis 1993;74(1):32-7.
7. a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Funasa; 2000.
8. Natal S, Valente J, Gerhardt G, Penna ML. Madelo de predição para o abandono do tratamento da tuberculose pulmonar. Bol Pneumol Sanit 1999;7(1):65-78.
9. Pablos-Méndez A, Knirsch CA, Barr RG, Lerner BH, Frieden TR. Nonadherence in tuberculosis treatment: predictors and consequences in New York city. Am J Med 1997;102(2):164-70.
10. Rosemberg J. Tuberculose: panorama global: óbices para seu controle. Fortaleza: Secretaria de Estado da Saúde do Ceará; 1999.p.23.
11. Sumartojo E. When tuberculosis treatment fails: a social behavioral account of patient adherence. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147(5):1311-20.
12. World Health Organization. WHO report on the tuberculosis epidemic, 1997: use dots more widely. Geneva; 1997. (WHO, TB/97.224).
13. World Health Organization. Group at risk: annual report, 1996. Geneva; 1996. (WHO, TB/96.198).
14. World Health Organization. Anti tuberculosis drug resistance in the world: the WHO/IUATLD global project on anti tuberculosis drug resistance surveillance, 1994-1997. Geneva; 1997. (WHO, TB/97.229).
15. World Health Organization. Treatment of tuberculosis: guidelines for national programmes. Geneva; 1997. (WHO, TB/97.220).