Stable gene replacement in barley by targeted double-strand break induction

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1433-1445

  Watanabe, Koichi ^a   Breier, Ulrike ^b   Hensel, Götz ^a   Kumlehn, Jochen ^a   Schubert, Ingo ^a,c   Reiss, Bernd ^b  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH IPK   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PLANT BREEDING RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Barley; double strand break induction; gene replacement; gene targeting; homology directed DNA integration; Hordeum vulgare; precision genome engineering

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE LOCUS; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC TRANSFORMATION; GENETICS; HORDEUM; INHERITANCE; PLANT GENE; PROCEDURES; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; GENE TARGETING; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC LOCI; HORDEUM; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TRANSFORMATION, GENETIC;

EID: 84974571346     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv537     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ainley WM, Sastry-Dent L, Welter ME, et al. 2013. Trait stacking via targeted genome editing. Plant Biotechnology Journal 11, 1126-1134.
2. Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Nekrasov V. 2013. Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods 9, 39.
3. Beumer KJ, Trautman JK, Christian M, Dahlem TJ, Lake CM, Hawley RS, Grunwald DJ, Voytas DF, Carroll D. 2013. Comparing zinc finger nucleases and transcription activator-like effector nucleases for gene targeting in Drosophila. G3-Genes Genomes Genetics 3, 1717-1725.
4. Cai C, Doyon Y, Ainley WM, et al. 2009. Targeted transgene integration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases. Plant Molecular Biology 69, 699-709.
5. Chilton M-DM, Que Q. 2003. Targeted integration of T-DNA into the tobacco genome at double-stranded breaks: new insights on the mechanism of T-DNA integration. Plant Physiology 133, 956-965.
6. Christensen A, Quail P. 1996. Ubiquitin promoter-based vectors for high-level expression of selectable and/or screenable marker genes in monocotyledonous plants. Transgenic Research 5, 213-218.
7. Degroot MJA, Offringa R, Groet J, Does MP, Hooykaas PJJ, Van den Elzen PJM. 1994. Nonrecombinant background in gene targeting- illegitimate recombination between a Hpt gene and a defective 5' deleted NptII gene can restore a Km(R) phenotype in tobacco. Plant Molecular Biology 25, 721-733.
8. D'Halluin K, Vanderstraeten C, Stals E, Cornelissen M, Ruiter R. 2008. Homologous recombination: A basis for targeted genome optimization in crop species such as maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal 6, 93-102.
9. De Pater S, Neuteboom LW, Pinas JE, Hooykaas PJJ, Van Der Zaal BJ. 2009. ZFN-induced mutagenesis and gene-targeting in Arabidopsis through Agrobacterium-mediated floral dip transformation. Plant Biotechnology Journal 7, 821-835.
10. De Semir D, Aran JM. 2003. Misleading gene conversion frequencies due to a PCR artifact using small fragment homologous replacement. Oligonucleotides 13, 261-269.
11. Endo M, Osakabe K, Ono K, Handa H, Shimizu T, Toki S. 2007. Molecular breeding of a novel herbicide-tolerant rice by gene targeting. The Plant Journal 52, 157-166.
12. Fauser F, Schiml S, Puchta H. 2014. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 79, 348-359.
13. Feng Z, Mao Y, Xu N, et al. 2014. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111, 4632-4637.
14. Gottwald S, Bauer P, Komatsuda T, Lundqvist U, Stein N. 2009. TILLING in the two-rowed barley cultivar 'Barke' reveals preferred sites of functional diversity in the gene HvHox1. BMC Research Notes 2, 258.
15. Gurushidze M, Hensel G, Hiekel S, Schedel S, Valkov V, Kumlehn J. 2014. True-breeding targeted gene knock-out in barley using designer TALE-nuclease in haploid cells. PLoS One 9, e92046.
16. Hanin M, Volrath S, Bogucki A, Briker M, Ward E, Paszkowski J. 2001. Gene targeting in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 28, 671-677.
17. Hensel G, Kastner C, Oleszczuk S, Riechen J, Kumlehn J. 2009. Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer to cereal crop plants: current protocols for barley, wheat, triticale, and maize. International Journal of Plant Genomics 2009, 835608.
18. IntBarleySeqCon. 2012. A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome. Nature 491, 711-716.
19. Jacobsen J, Venables I, Wang M-B, Matthews P, Ayliffe M, Gubler F. 2006. Barley (Hordeium vulgare L.). Methods in Molecular Biology 343, 171-183.
20. Johnson RA, Gurevich V, Filler S, Samach A, Levy AA. 2015. Comparative assessments of CRISPR-Cas nucleases' cleavage efficiency in planta. Plant Molecular Biology 87, 143-156.
21. Jovtchev G, Watanabe K, Pecinka A, Rosin FM, Mette MF, Lam E, Schubert I. 2008. Size and number of tandem repeat arrays can determine somatic homologous pairing of transgene loci mediated by epigenetic modifications in Arabidopsis thaliana nuclei. Chromosoma 117, 267-276.
22. Judo MSB, Wedel AB, Wilson C. 1998. Stimulation and suppression of PCR-mediated recombination. Nucleic Acids Research 26, 1819-1825.
23. Lundqvist U. 2014. Scandinavian mutation research in barley-a historical review. Hereditas 151, 123-131.
24. Lundqvist U, Franckowiak JD. 2003. Diversity of barley mutants. In: von Bothmer R, van Hintum T, Knüpffer H, Sato K. eds. Diversity in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV, 77-96.
25. Markmann-Mulisch U, Wendeler E, Zobell O, Schween G, Steinbiss HH, Reiss B. 2007. Differential requirements for RAD51 in Physcomitrella patens and Arabidopsis thaliana development and DNA damage repair. The Plant Cell 19, 3080-3089.
26. Mayer KFX, Martis M, Hedley PE, et al. 2011. Unlocking the barley genome by chromosomal and comparative genomics. The Plant Cell 23, 1249-1263.
27. Mikami M, Toki S, Endo M. 2015. Comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 expression constructs for efficient targeted mutagenesis in rice. Plant Molecular Biology 88, 561-572.
28. Offringa R, De GMJA, Haagsman HJ, Does MP, Van Den Elzen PJM, Hooykaas PJJ. 1990. Extrachromosomal homologous recombination and gene targeting in plant cells after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. EMBO Journal 9, 3077-3084.
29. Osakabe Y, Osakabe K. 2014. Genome editing with engineered nucleases in plants. Plant and Cell Physiology 56, 389-400.
30. Puchta H. 1998. Repair of genomic double-strand breaks in somatic plant-cells by one-sided invasion of homologous sequences. The Plant Journal 13, 331-339.
31. Puchta H, Dujon B, Hohn B. 1996. 2 different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 5055-5060.
32. Puchta H, Fauser F. 2013. Gene targeting in plants: 25 years later. International Journal of Developmental Biology 57, 629-637.
33. Puchta H, Fauser F. 2014. Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future. The Plant Journal 78, 727-741.
34. Qi Y, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Baller JA, Cleland SC, Ryu Y, Starker CG, Voytas DF. 2013. Increasing frequencies of site-specific mutagenesis and gene targeting in Arabidopsis by manipulating DNA repair pathways. Genome Research 23, 547-554.
35. Reiss B. 2003. Homologous recombination and gene targeting in plant cells. International Review of Cytology 228, 85-139.
36. Reiss B, Schubert I, Kopchen K, Wendeler E, Schell J, Puchta H. 2000. RecA stimulates sister chromatid exchange and the fidelity of double-strand break repair, but not gene targeting, in plants transformed by Agrobacterium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 3358-3363.
37. Shukla VK, Doyon Y, Miller JC, et al. 2009. Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 459, 437-441.
38. Tingay S, McElroy D, Kalla R, Fieg S, Wang M, Thornton S, Brettell R. 1997. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated barley transformation. The Plant Journal 11, 1369-1376.
39. Townsend JA, Wright DA, Winfrey RJ, Fu F, Maeder ML, Joung JK, Voytas DF. 2009. High-frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 459, 442-445.
40. Voytas DF. 2013. Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases. Annual Review of Plant Biology 64, 327-350.
41. Vu GTH, Cao HX, Watanabe K, Hensel G, Blattner FR, Kumlehn J, Schubert I. 2014. Repair of site-specific DNA double-strand breaks in barley occurs via diverse pathways primarily involving the sister chromatid. The Plant Cell 26, 2156-2167.
42. Wang M-B, Waterhouse P. 2000. High-efficiency silencing of a β-glucuronidase gene in rice is correlated with repetitive transgene structure but is independent of DNA methylation. Plant Molecular Biology 43, 67-82.
43. Wood AJ, Lo T-W, Zeitler B, et al. 2011. Targeted genome editing across species using ZFNs and TALENs. Science 333, 307.
44. Zobell O. 2006. The family of CONSTANS-like genes in the moss Physcomitrella patens , PhD thesis, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
45. Zobell O, Reiss B. 2010. Gene targeting as a precise tool for plant mutagenesis. In: Meksem K, Kahl G, eds. The handbook of plant mutation screening (Mining of natural and induced alleles). Weinheim: Wiley-Blackwell-VCH, 263-285.