Classification of fractures

Rockwood, Green, and Wilkins Fractures in Adults and Children: Eighth Edition

Volumn 1-2, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Dirschl, Douglas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974559621     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. Andersen DJ, Blair WF, Steyers CM, et al. Classification of distal radius fractures: An analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. J Hand Surg. 1996;21A:574-582.
2. Andersen E, Jorgensen LG, Hededam LT. Evans classification of trochanteric fractures: An assessment for the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. Injury. 1990;21:377-378.
3. Anderson GR, Rasmussen JB, Dahl B, et al. Oldefs classification of Colle fractures: Good intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in 185 cases. Acta Orthop Scan. 1991;62:463-464.
4. Audige L, Bhandari M, Kellam J. How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications? A systematic review of their methodologies. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:184-194.
5. Barker L, Anderson J, Chesnut R, et al. Reliability and reproducibility of dens fracture classification with use of plain radiography and reformatted computer-aided tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:106-112.
6. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Matta JM. Letournel classification for acetabular fractures: Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1704-1709.
7. Bernstein J, Adler LM, Blank JE, et al. Evaluation of the Neer system of classification of proximal humeral fractures with computerized tomographic scans and plain radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1371-1375.
8. Borrelli J Jr, Goldfarb C, Catalano L, et al. Assessment of articular fragment displacement in acetabular fractures: A comparison of computed tomography and plain radiographs. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:449-456.
9. Brorson S, Bagger J, Sylvest A, et al. Low agreement among 24 doctors using the Neer classification; only moderate agreement on displacement, even between specialists. Int Orthop. 2002;26:271-273.
10. Brumback RJ, Jones AL. Interobserver agreement in the classification of open fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:1162-1166.
11. Burstein AH. Fracture classification systems: Do they work and are they useful? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1743-1744.
12. Chan PSH, Klimkiewicz JJ, Luchette WT, et al. Impact of CT scan on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:484-489.
13. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psych Meas. 1960;20:37-46.
14. Cole RJ, Bindra RR, Evanoff BA, et al. Radiographic evaluation of osseous displacement following intraarticular fracture of the distal radius: Reliability of plain radiographs versus computed tomography. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22:792-800.
15. Colles A. On the fracture of the carpal extremity of the radius. Edinb Med Surg J. 1814;10:182-186.
16. Craig WL III, Dirschl DR. An assessment of the effectiveness of binary decision-making in improving the reliability of the AO/ASIF classification of fractures of the ankle. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:280-284.
17. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297-334.
18. Dahlen HC, Franck WM, Sabauri G, et al. Incorrect classification of extra-articular distal radius fractures by conventional x-rays: Comparison between biplanar radiologic diagnostics and CT assessment of fracture morphology. Unfallchirurg. 2004;107(6):491-498.
19. DeCoster TA, Willis MC, Marsh JL, et al. Rank order analysis of tibial plafond fracture: Does injury or reduction predict outcome? Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:44-49.
20. Desai VV, Davis TRC, Barton NJ. The prognostic value and reproducibility of the radiological features of the fractured scaphoid. J Hand Surg Br. 1999;5:586-590.
21. Dirschl DR, Ferry ST. Reliability of classification of fractures of the tibial plafond according to a rank order method. J Trauma. 2006;61:1463-1466.
22. Dirschl DR, Adams GL. A critical assessment of methods to improve reliability in the classification of fractures, using fractures of the tibial plafond as a model. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:471-476.
23. Dirschl DR, Dawson PA. Assessment of injury severity in tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2004;423:85-92.
24. Dirschl DR, Marsh JL, Buckwalter JA, et al. Articular Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12(6):416-423.
25. Doornberg J, Lindenhovius A, Kloen P, et al. Two-and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and management of distal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1795-1801.
26. Doornberg JN, Rademakers MV, van den Bekerom MP, et al. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and characterization of tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2011;42:1416-1425.
27. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1981:218.
28. Fleiss JL, Stakter MJ, Fischman SL, et al. Inter-examiner reliability in caries trials. J Dent Res. 1979;58:604-609.
29. Frandsen PA, Andersen E, Madsen F, et al. Garden classification of femoral neck fractures: An assessment of interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:588-590.
30. Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Esdaile J, et al. Classification systems in orthopaedics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10:290-297.
31. Garden RS. Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:647-663.
32. Gaston P, Will R, Elton RA, et al. Fractures of the tibia: Can their outcome be predicted? J Bone Joint Surg. 1999;81B:71-76.
33. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prediction of infection in the treatment of 1025 open fractures in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg. 1976;58A:453-458.
34. Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN. Problems in the management of Type III (severe) open fractures: A new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma. 1984;24(8):742-746.
35. Hu YL, Ye FG, Ji AY, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging increases the reliability of classification systems for tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2009;40:1282-1285.
36. Humphrey CA, Dirschl DR, Ellis TJ. Interobserver reliability of a CT-based fracture classification system. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:616-622.
37. Katz MA, Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ, et al. Computed tomography scanning of intraarticular distal radius fractures: Does it influence treatment? J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(3):415-421.
38. Kreder HJ, Hanel DP, McKee M, et al. Consistency of AO fracture classification for the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:726-731.
39. Kristiansen B, Andersen ULS, Olsen CA, et al. The Neer classification of fractures of the proximal humerus: An assessment of interobserver variation. Skeletal Radiol. 1988;17:420-422.
40. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
41. Lauder AJ, Inda DJ, Bott AM, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:251-255.
42. Lauge-Hansen N. Fractures of the ankle. III: Genetic roentgenologic diagnosis of fractures of the ankle. AJR. 1954;71:456-471.
43. Lien J, Lee J, Maratt J, et al. Computed Tomographic Measurement of Pelvic Landmarks in Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Sacral Fractures: Comparison to Radiographic Measurements. Poster presentation at the 28th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Minneapolis, MN, October 3-6, 2012.
44. Mahadeva D, Dias RG, Deshpande SV, et al. The reliability and reproducibility of the Neer classification system-digital radiography (PACS) improves agreement. Injury. 2011;42:339-342.
45. Majed A, MacLeod I, Bull A, et al. Proximal humeral fracture classifications systems revisted. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:1125-1132.
46. Maripuri SN, Rao P, Manoj-Thomas A, et al. The classification systems for tibial plateau fractures: How reliable are they? Injury. 2008;39:1216-1221.
47. Marsh JL, Buckwalter J, Gelberman RC, et al. Does an anatomic reduction really change the result in the management of articular fractures? J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84-A:1259-1271.
48. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2007. F Orthop Trauma. 2007;21:S1-S160.
49. Martin JS, Marsh JL. Current classification of fractures; rationale and utility. Radiol Clin North Am. 1997;35:491-506.
50. Martin JS, Marsh JL, Bonar SK, et al. Assessment of the AO/ASIF fracture classification for the distal tibia. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:477-483.
51. Martin J, Marsh JL, Nepola JV, et al. Radiographic fracture assessments: Which ones can we reliably make? J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(6):379-385.
52. Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium. Apples to Apples: Moving to the New OTA Fracture Severity Classification in Extremity Trauma Research. Poster presentation at the 28th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Minneapolis, MN, October 3-6, 2012.
53. Moed RB, Carr SEW, Watson JT. Open reduction and internal fixation of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. Clin Orthop and Rel Res. 2000;377:57-67.
54. Muller ME. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bone. In: Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, et al., eds. Manual of Internal Fixation: Techniques Recommended by the AO-ASIF Group. 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1991.
55. Muller ME, Nazarian S, Kack P. CCF: Comprehensive Classification of Fractures. Bern: Maurice E Muller Foundation; 1996.
56. Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Part I: Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1077-1089.
57. Nielsen JO, Dons-Jensen H, Sorensen HT. Lauge-Hansen classification of malleolar fractures: An assessment of the reproducibility of 118 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1990;61:385-387.
58. Oakes DA, Jackson KR, Davies MR, et al. The impact of the Garden classification on proposed operative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;409:232-240.
59. Oestern HJ, Txcherne H. Pathophysiology and classification of soft tissue injuries associated with fractures. In: Tscherne H, ed. Fracture with Soft Tissue Injuries. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1984:1-9.
60. Oner FC, Ramos LMP, Simmermacher RKJ, et al. Classification of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: Problems of reproducibility. Eur Spine J. 2002;11:235-245.
61. Orthopaedic Trauma Association: Open Fracture Study Group. A new classification scheme for open fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:457-465.
62. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification. Fracture and dislocation compendium. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(suppl 1):1-154.
63. Pervez H, Parker MJ, Pryor GA, et al. Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: A study of the reliability of current systems. Injury. 2002;33:713-715.
64. Petrisor BA, Bhandari M, Orr RD, et al. Improving reliability in the classification of fractures of the acetabulum. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123:228-233.
65. Pott P. Some Few General Remarks on Fractures and Dislocations. London: Hawes L, Clarke W and Collins R; 1765.
66. Rasmussen S, Madsen PV, Bennicke K. Observer variation in the Lauge-Hansen classification of ankle fractures: Precision improved by instruction. Actat Orthop Scand. 1993;64:693-694.
67. Sanders R. Displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(2):225-250.
68. Schatzker J. Fractures of the tibial plateau. In: Schatzker M, Tile M, eds. Rationale of Operative Fractures Care. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1988:279-295.
69. Schatzker J, McBroom R. Tibial plateau fractures: The Toronto experience 1968-1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;138:94-104.
70. Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, et al. Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for peritrochanteric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:36-41.
71. Seigel G, Podgor MJ, Remaley NA. Acceptable values of kappa for comparison of two groups. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135:571-578.
72. Shepherd LE, Zalavras CG, Jaki K, et al. Gunshot femoral shaft fractures: Is the current classification system reliable? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;408:101-109.
73. Sidor JL, Zuckerman JD, Lyon T, et al. The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures: An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1745-1750.
74. Siebenrock KA, Gerber C. The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1751-1755.
75. Svanholm H, Starklint H, Gundersen HJ, et al. Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic. APMIS. 1989;97:689-698.
76. Swiontkowski JF, Agel J, McAndrew MP, et al. Outcome validation of the AO/OTA fracture classification system. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:534-541.
77. Swiontkowski JF, Sands AK, Agel J, et al. Interobserver variation in the AO/OTA fracture classification system for pilon fractures: Is there a problem? J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:467-470.
78. Thomsen NOB, Olsen LH, Nielsen ST. Kappa statistics in the assessment of observer variation: The significance of multiple observers classifying ankle fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2002;7:163-166.
79. Thomsen NOB, Overgaard S, Olen LH, et al. Observer variation in the radiographic classification of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:676-678.
80. Visutipol B, Chobrangsin P, Ketmalasiri B, et al. Evaluation of Letournel and Judet classification of acetabular fracture with plain radiographs and three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan. J Orthop Surg. 2000;8:33-37.
81. Van Embden D, Roukema GR, Rhemrev SJ, et al. The Pauwels classification for intracapsular hip fractures: Is it reliable? Injury. 2011;42:1238-1240.
82. Walton NP, Harish S, Roberts C, et al. AO or Schatzker? How reliable is classification of tibial plateau fractures? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123:396-398.
83. Wicky S, Blaser PF, Blanc CH, et al. Comparison between standard radiography and spiral CT with 3D reconstruction in the evaluation, classification and management of tibial plateau fractures. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1227-1232. (showed change in surgical plan in 59% of cases, but no diff in classification).
84. Yacoubian SV, Nevins RT, Sallis JG, et al. Impact of MRI on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:632-637.