Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures

Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 36-41

  Schipper, I B ^a   Steyerberg, E W ^a   Castelein, R M ^a   Van Vugt, A B ^a  

^a HOSPITAL DE WEEZENLANDEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMUR TROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

FEMORAL FRACTURES; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHOPEDICS; RADIOLOGY; SURGERY; TRAUMATOLOGY;

EID: 0035066740     PISSN: 00016470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/000164701753606662     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Editorial. Fracture classification systems: Do they work and are they useful?
2. Effects of binary decision making on the classification of fractures of the ankle
3. A critical assessment of factors influencing reliability in the classification of fractures, using fractures of the tibial plafond as a model
4. An introduction to the bootstrap
5. Interobserver reliability in the Gustilo and Anderson classification of open fractures
6. Interobserver variation using the AO/ASIF classification of long bone fractures
7. Consistency of AO fracture classification for the distal radius
8. The Neer classification of fractures of the proximal humerus
9. Current classification of fractures
10. Assessment of the AO/ASIF Fracture Classification for the distal tibia
11. Acceptable values of Kappa for comparison of two groups
12. The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus
13. Observer variation in the radiographic classification of ankle fractures