Physiologic principles and urea kinetic modeling

Handbook of Dialysis: Fifth Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages

  Daugirdas, John T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84973911497     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Casino FG, Lopez T. The equivalent renal urea clearance. A new parameter to assess dialysis dose. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11:1574-1581.
2. Daugirdas JT. Simplified equations for monitoring Kt/V, PCRn, eKt/V, and ePCRn. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1995;2:295-304.
3. Daugirdas JT. Dialysis dosing for chronic hemodialysis: beyond Kt/V. Semin Dial. 2014;27:98-107.
4. Daugirdas JT, Schneditz D. Overestimation of hemodialysis dose depends on dialysis efficiency by regional blood flow but not by conventional two pool urea kinetic analysis. ASAIO J. 1995;41:M719-M724.
5. Daugirdas JT, et al; for the Hemodialysis Study Group. Factors that affect postdialysis rebound in serum urea concentration, including the rate of dialysis: results from the HEMO Study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:194-203.
6. Daugirdas JT, et al. Solute-solver: a Web-based tool for modeling urea kinetics for a broad range of hemodialysis schedules in multiple patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54:798-809.
7. Daugirdas JT, et al; Frequent Hemodialysis Network Trial Group. Standard Kt/V urea: a method of calculation that includes effects of fluid removal and residual kidney clearance. Kidney Int. 2010;77:637-644.
8. Daugirdas JT, et al; FHN Trial Group. Improved equation for estimating single-pool Kt/V at higher dialysis frequencies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28:2156-2160.
9. Depner TA, Daugirdas JT. Equations for normalized protein catabolic rate based on two-point modeling of hemodialysis urea kinetics. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7: 780-785.
10. Depner TA, et al. Dialyzer performance in the HEMO study: in vivo K0A and true blood flow determined from a model of cross-dialyzer urea extraction. ASAIO J. 2004;50:85-93.
11. Gotch FA. Evolution of the single-pool urea kinetic model [abstract]. Semin Dial. 2001;14(4):252-256.
12. Gotch FA, et al. Mechanisms determining the ratio of conductivity clearance to urea clearance. Kidney Int Suppl. 2004;(89):S3-S24.
13. Leypoldt JK, Jaber BL, Zimmerman DL. Predicting treatment dose for novel therapies using urea standard Kt/V. Semin Dial. 2004;17:142-145.
14. Leypoldt JK, et al. Hemodialyzer mass transfer-area coefficients for urea increase at high dialysate flow rates. The Hemodialysis (HEMO) study. Kidney Int. 1997;51:2013-2017.
15. Lowrie EG, et al. The online measurement of hemodialysis dose (Kt): clinical outcome as a function of body surface area. Kidney Int. 2005;68(3):1344-1354.
16. Melamed ML, et al. Retained organic solutes, patient characteristics and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis: results from the retained organic solutes and clinical outcomes (ROSCO) investigators. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:134.
17. McIntyre CW, et al. Assessment of haemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: intra-patient variability of delivered treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18:559-563.
18. Schneditz D, et al. Cardiopulmonary recirculation during dialysis. Kidney Int. 1992;42:1450.
19. Sirich TL, et al. Numerous protein-bound solutes are cleared by the kidney with high efficiency. Kidney Int. 2013;84:585-590.
20. Tattersall JE, et al. The post-hemodialysis rebound: predicting and quantifying its effect on Kt/V. Kidney Int. 1996;50:2094-2102.
21. Uhlin F, et al. Dialysis dose (Kt/V) and clearance variation sensitivity using measurement of ultraviolet-absorbance (on-line), blood urea, dialysate urea and ionic dialysance. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:2225-2231.
22. KDOQI Hemodialysis Adequacy guidelines 2006. http://www.kidney.org.
23. Urea kinetic modeling calculators. http://www.ureakinetics.org.
24. Urea kinetic modeling channel. http://www.hdcn.com/ch/adeq/.