High shear stress relates to intraplaque haemorrhage in asymptomatic carotid plaques

Atherosclerosis

Volumn 251, Issue , 2016, Pages 348-354

  Tuenter, A ^a,b   Selwaness, M ^a   Arias Lorza, A ^a   Schuurbiers, J C H ^a   Speelman, L ^a   Cibis, M ^a   van der Lugt, A ^a   de Bruijne, M ^a,c   van der Steen, A F W ^a   Franco, O H ^a   Vernooij, M W ^a   Wentzel, J J ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Netherlands Institute for Health Sciences   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Atherosclerosis; Carotid artery; MRI; Shear stress; Vulnerable plaque

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTEROL; HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN;

AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CAROTID ARTERY BIFURCATION; CAROTID ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAPLAQUE HEMORRHAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CAROTID ARTERY; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CHEMISTRY; COMPLICATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; MECHANICAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHEAR STRENGTH;

AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; CAROTID ARTERIES; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASES; CAROTID STENOSIS; FEMALE; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PLAQUE, ATHEROSCLEROTIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84973869268     PISSN: 00219150     EISSN: 18791484     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.05.018     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. [1] Hollander, M., et al. Carotid plaques increase the risk of stroke and subtypes of cerebral infarction in asymptomatic elderly: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation 105:24 (2002), 2872–2877.
2. [2] Stary, H.C., et al. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the committee on vascular lesions of the council on arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation 92:5 (1995), 1355–1374.
3. [3] Underhill, H.R., et al. Predictors of surface disruption with MR imaging in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 31:3 (2010), 487–493.
4. [4] Gupta, A., et al. Carotid plaque MRI and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 44:11 (2013), 3071–3077.
5. [5] Schaar, J.A., et al. Terminology for high-risk and vulnerable coronary artery plaques. Report of a meeting on the vulnerable plaque, June 17 and 18, 2003, Santorini, Greece. Eur. Heart J. 25:12 (2004), 1077–1082.
6. [6] Wu, B., et al. How does calcification influence plaque vulnerability? Insights from fatigue analysis. Sci. World J., 2014, 2014, 417324.
7. [7] Wong, K.K., et al. Effect of calcification on the mechanical stability of plaque based on a three-dimensional carotid bifurcation model. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord., 12, 2012, 7.
8. [8] Sadat, U., et al. Biomechanical structural stresses of atherosclerotic plaques. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 8:10 (2010), 1469–1481.
9. [9] Groen, H.C., et al. High shear stress influences plaque vulnerability part of the data presented in this paper were published in Stroke 2007;38:2379–2381. Neth. Heart J. 16:7–8 (2008), 280–283.
10. [10] Zarins, C.K., et al. Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis. Quantitative correlation of plaque localization with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress. Circ. Res. 53:4 (1983), 502–514.
11. [11] Asakura, T., et al. Flow patterns and spatial distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arteries. Circ. Res. 66:4 (1990), 1045–1066.
12. [12] Gnasso, A., et al. In vivo association between low wall shear stress and plaque in subjects with asymmetrical carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke 28:5 (1997), 993–998.
13. [13] Dai, G., et al. Distinct endothelial phenotypes evoked by arterial waveforms derived from atherosclerosis-susceptible and -resistant regions of human vasculature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:41 (2004), 14871–14876.
14. [14] Malek, A.M., et al. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 282:21 (1999), 2035–2042.
15. [15] Gimbrone, M.A. Jr., et al. Endothelial dysfunction, hemodynamic forces, and atherogenesis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 902 (2000), 230–239 discussion 9–40.
16. [16] Chatzizisis, Y.S., et al. Prediction of the localization of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the basis of low endothelial shear stress: an intravascular ultrasound and histopathology natural history study. Circulation 117:8 (2008), 993–1002.
17. [17] Cheng, C., et al. Shear stress-induced changes in atherosclerotic plaque composition are modulated by chemokines. J. Clin. Investig. 117:3 (2007), 616–626.
18. [18] Yuan, C., et al. In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation 104:17 (2001), 2051–2056.
19. [19] van den Bouwhuijsen, Q.J., et al. Determinants of magnetic resonance imaging detected carotid plaque components: the Rotterdam Study. Eur. Heart J. 33:2 (2012), 221–229.
20. [20] Groen, H.C., et al. MRI-based quantification of outflow boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics of stenosed human carotid arteries. J. Biomech. 43:12 (2010), 2332–2338.
21. [21] Hofman, A., et al. The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 28:11 (2013), 889–926.
22. [22] North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial, Methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke 22:6 (1991), 711–720.
23. [23] Arias, A., et al. Carotid artery wall segmentation by coupled surface graph cuts. Menze, B., Langs, G., Lu, L., Montillo, A., Tu, Z., Criminisi, A., (eds.) Medical Computer Vision Recognition Techniques and Applications in Medical Imaging, 2013, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 38–47.
24. [24] Cibis, M., et al. Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: a comparison study in healthy carotid arteries. NMR Biomed. 27:7 (2014), 826–834.
25. [25] Gallo, D., et al. An insight into the mechanistic role of the common carotid artery on the hemodynamics at the carotid bifurcation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 43:1 (2015), 68–81.
26. [26] Lee, S.W., et al. Geometry of the carotid bifurcation predicts its exposure to disturbed flow. Stroke 39:8 (2008), 2341–2347.
27. [27] Tang, D., et al. Image-based modeling for better understanding and assessment of atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability: data, modeling, validation, uncertainty and predictions. J. Biomech. 47:4 (2014), 834–846.
28. [28] Yang, C., et al. Impact of flow rates in a cardiac cycle on correlations between advanced human carotid plaque progression and mechanical flow shear stress and plaque wall stress. Biomed. Eng. Online 10:61 (2011), 10–61.
29. [29] Takaya, N., et al. Presence of intraplaque hemorrhage stimulates progression of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Circulation 111:21 (2005), 2768–2775.
30. [30] Gijsen, F., et al. Shear stress and advanced atherosclerosis in human coronary arteries. J. Biomech. 46:2 (2013), 240–247.
31. [31] Wentzel, J.J., et al. Extension of increased atherosclerotic wall thickness into high shear stress regions is associated with loss of compensatory remodeling. Circulation 108:1 (2003), 17–23.
32. [32] Tang, H., et al. Semi-automatic MRI segmentation and volume quantification of intra-plaque hemorrhage. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 10:1 (2015), 67–74.
33. [33] Cibis, M., et al. Relation between wall shear stress and carotid artery wall thickening MRI versus CFD. J. Biomech. 10:16 (2016), 30098–30107.
34. [34] Tang, D., et al. Correlations between carotid plaque progression and mechanical stresses change sign over time: a patient follow up study using MRI and 3D FSI models. Biomed. Eng. Online, 12, 2013, 105.
35. [35] Oshinski, J.N., et al. Mean-average wall shear stress measurements in the common carotid artery. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reason. 8:5 (2006), 717–722.
36. [36] Canton, G., et al. A framework for the co-registration of hemodynamic forces and atherosclerotic plaque components. Physiol. Meas. 34:9 (2013), 977–990.
37. [37] Winkel, L.C., et al. Animal models of surgically manipulated flow velocities to study shear stress-induced atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 241:1 (2015), 100–110.
38. [38] Eshtehardi, P., et al. Association of coronary wall shear stress with atherosclerotic plaque burden, composition, and distribution in patients with coronary artery disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc., 1(4), 2012, 24.
39. [39] Wentzel, J.J., et al. In vivo assessment of the relationship between shear stress and necrotic core in early and advanced coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 9:8 (2013), 989–995.
40. [40] Samady, H., et al. Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 124:7 (2011), 779–788.
41. [41] Corban, M.T., et al. Combination of plaque burden, wall shear stress, and plaque phenotype has incremental value for prediction of coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability. Atherosclerosis 232:2 (2014), 271–276.
42. [42] Teng, Z., et al. A uni-extension study on the ultimate material strength and extreme extensibility of atherosclerotic tissue in human carotid plaques. J. Biomech. 48:14 (2015), 3859–3867.