The impact of international trade on environmental quality: The case of transition countries

Energy

Volumn 109, Issue , 2016, Pages 1130-1138

  Halicioglu, Ferda ^a   Ketenci, Natalya ^b  

^a ISTANBUL MEDENIYET UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cointegration; Displacement hypothesis; EKC hypothesis; Environmental quality; International trade; Transition countries

Indexed keywords

CARBON; COMMERCE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; METHOD OF MOMENTS; PUBLIC POLICY;

COINTEGRATION; DISPLACEMENT HYPOTHESIS; EKC HYPOTHESIS; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; TRANSITION COUNTRIES;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; LITERATURE REVIEW; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; RESEARCH WORK; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ARMENIA [WEST ASIA]; ESTONIA; KYRGYZSTAN; LATVIA; PRUSSIA; TURKMENISTAN; UZBEKISTAN;

EID: 84973867120     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Andres A.R., Halicioglu F., Yamamura E. Socio-economic determinants of suicide in Japan. J Socio-economics 2011, 40:723-731.
2. Al-Mulali U., Saboori B., Ozturk I. Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy 2015, 76:123-131.
3. Altinanahtar A., Halicioglu F. A dynamic econometric study of suicides in Turkey. J Socio-Economics 2007, 38(No.6):903-907.
4. Andreoni J., Levinson A. The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. J Public Econ 2001, 80:269-286.
5. Aslanidis N. Environmental Kuznets curves for carbon emissions: A critical survey 2009, FEEM Working Paper, No. 75-2009.
6. 2 emissions: the case of Arctic countries. Energy Econ 2015, 50:13-17.
7. Bahmani-Oskooee M., Ardalani Z. Exchange rate sensitivity of U.S. trade flows: evidence from industry data. South Econ J 2006, 72:542-559.
8. Bahmani-Oskooee M., Goswami G.G. A disaggregated approach to test the J-curve phenomenon: Japan versus her major trading partners. J Econ Finance 2003, 27:102-113.
9. Biardi D. Technological progress and the environmental Kuznets curve in the twenty regions of Italy. B.E J Econ Analysis Policy 2014, 14:1501-1542.
10. Bo S. A literature survey on environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Procedia 2010, 5:1322-1325.
11. Borghesi S. The environmental Kuznets curve: A survey of the literature 1999, FEEM Working Paper, No. 85-99.
12. Cole M.A. Development, trade, and the environment: how robust is the environmental Kuznets curve?. Environ Dev Econ 2003, 8:557-580.
13. Cole M.A. Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol Econ 2004, 48:71-81.
14. Davidson R., MacKinnon J. Econometric theory and methods 2004, Oxford University Press.
15. Dell'Anno R., Halicioglu F. An ARDL model of recorded and unrecorded economies in Turkey. J Econ Stud 2010, 37:627-646.
16. Dinda S. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 2004, 49:431-455.
17. 2 emissions: 2014 Report 2014, European Commission and Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
18. Egli H. A new approach to pollution modelling in models of the environmental Kuznets curve 2005, Working Paper, No. 05/39, WIF, Institute of Economic Research.
19. Elliot G., Rothenberg T.J., Stock J.H. Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 1996, 64:813-836.
20. Flores N.E., Carson R.T. The relationship between the income elasticities of demand and willingness to pay. J Environ Econ Manag 1997, 33:287-295.
21. Grossman G., Krueger A. Economic environment and the economic growth. Q J Econ 1995, 110:353-377.
22. Grossman G.M., Krueger A.B. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. The US-Mexico free trade agreement 1991, MIT Press, Cambridge MA. P. Garber (Ed.).
23. Halicioglu F. Dynamics of obesity in Finland. J Econ Stud 2013, 40:644-657.
24. Halicioglu F. The demand for calories in Turkey 2012, MPRA Papers, No:48342.
25. Halicioglu F. A dynamic econometric study of income, energy and exports in Turkey. Energy 2011, 36:3348-3354.
26. Halicioglu F. An econometric analysis of aggregate outbound tourism demand of Turkey. Tour Econ 2010, 16:83-98.
27. 2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 2009, 37:699-702.
28. 2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey 2009, MPRA Papers, No:11457.
29. Hall A. Generalized method of moments 2005, Oxford University Press.
30. Hamilton J.D. Time series analysis 1994, Princeton University Press.
31. Hansen L. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 1982, 50:1029-1054.
32. Hayashi F. Econometrics 2000, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
33. He J. Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis valid for developing countries? A survey 2003, GREDI Working Paper, No. 07-03.
34. 2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, foreign trade and urbanization of Japan. Low Carbon Econ 2012, 3:92-105.
35. IAE Key world energy statistics 2015, International Energy Agency.
36. IMF International financial statistics 2015, International Monetary Fund.
37. IPCC Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014, 151. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, Core Writing Team. R.K. Pachauri, L.Meyer (Eds.).
38. Kearsley A., Riddel M. A further inquiry into the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 2010, 69:905-919.
39. Kellenberg K.D. An empirical investigation of the pollution haven effect with strategic environment and trade policy. J Int Econ 2015, 78:242-255.
40. Ketenci N. Capital mobility in the panel GMM framework: evidence from EU members. Eur J Comp Econ 2015, 12:3-19.
41. Kijima M., Nishide K., Ohyama A. Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: a survey. J Econ Dyn Control 2010, 34:1187-1201.
42. Kivyiro P., Aminen K. Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and trade: causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy 2014, 74:595-606.
43. Khanna N. The income elasticity of non-point source air pollutants: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve. Econ Lett 2002, 77:387-392.
44. Khanna N., Plassmann F. The demand for environmental quality and the environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Ecol Econ 2004, 51:225-236.
45. Kristrom B., Riera P. Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one?. Environ Resour Econ 1996, 7:45-55.
46. Kuznets S. Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 1995, 45:1-28.
47. 2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade: a South African perspective. Energy Policy 2013, 63:1042-1050.
48. Kwiatkowski D., Phillips P.C.B., Schmidt P., Shin Y. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. J Econ 1992, 44:159-178.
49. 2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in Africa. Appl Energy 2010, 87:1858-1864.
50. Lieb C.M. The environmental Kuznets curve - a survey of the empirical evidence and of possible causes 2003, Discussion Paper Series, 391, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
51. Managi S. Are there increasing returns to pollution abatement? Empirical analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve in pesticides. Ecol Econ 2006, 58:617-636.
52. 2 emissions. Trends: a compendium of data on global change. Carbon dioxide information analysis center, Oak ridge national laboratory, U.S. Department of energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A 2000.
53. Nahman A., Antrobus G. Trade and the environmental Kuznets curve: is southern Africa a pollution haven?. South Afr J Econ 2005, 73:803-814.
54. Narayan P.K. The Saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 2005, 37:1979-1990.
55. Pasten R., Figueroa E.B. The Environmental Kuznets curve: a survey of the theoretical literature. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 2012, 6:195-224.
56. Payne J.E. Survey of the international evidence on the causal relationship between energy consumption and growth. J Econ Stud 2008, 37:53-95.
57. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y., Smith R.J. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 2001, 16:289-326.
58. Phillips P.C.B., Perron P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 1988, 75:335-346.
59. Rubio S.J., García J.R., Hueso J.L. Neoclassical growth, environment and technological change: the environmental Kuznets curve 2010, FEEM Working Paper No. 125.2009. Available at SSRN:. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1533276.
60. Said S.E., Dickey D.A. Testing for unit roots in autoregressive - moving average model of unknown order. Biometrica 1984, 71:599-608.
61. Shafik N., Bandyopadhyay S. Economic growth and environmental quality: time series and cross-country evidence 1992, Background Paper for the World Development Report 1992, The World Bank, Washington DC.
62. Sharma S.S. Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries. Appl Energy 2011, 88:376-382.
63. 2 and the environment 2014, SSRN Working Papers, No: 2374883.
64. Stern N. Stern review: the economics of climate change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
65. Stern D.I., Common M.S., Barbier E.B. Economic growth and environmental degradation: a critique of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 1996, 24:1154-1160.
66. Stern D.I. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 2004, 32:1419-1439.
67. Suri V., Chapman D. Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 1998, 25:195-208.
68. The World Bank World development indicators 2015, [Washington, DC].
69. Qu B., Zhang Y. Effect of income distribution on the environmental Kuznets curve. Pac Econ Rev 2011, 16:349-370.
70. 2 Kuznets curve: evidence from China. Energy Policy 2015, 77:97-108.
71. WRI CAIT country greenhouse gas emissions, annual reports 2015, World Resources Institute.
72. Wooldridge J.M. Applications of generalized method of moments estimation. J Econ Perspect 2001, 15:87-100.