Big Data Quality: A Roadmap for Open Data

Proceedings - 2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications, BigDataService 2016

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 210-215

  Ciancarini, Paolo ^a   Poggi, Francesco ^a   Russo, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Big Data Knowledge Extraction; E Government; Information Modeling; Open Data Quality

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

DISTRIBUTED INFORMATION SOURCES; E-GOVERNMENTS; EXPLORATORY CASE STUDIES; INFORMATION MODELING; KNOWLEDGE EXTRACTION; OPEN DATUM; PRIVATE COMPANIES; PUBLIC INSTITUTION;

BIG DATA;

EID: 84973631196     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/BigDataService.2016.37     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. M Aboelmeged. A soft system perspective on information quality in electronic commerce. In Proceeding of the Fifth Conference on Information Quality, 2000.
2. Periklis Andritsos and Patrick Keilty. Level-wise exploration of linked and big data guided by controlled vocabularies and folksonomies. Advances In Classification Research Online, 24(1):1-3, 2014.
3. Sören Auer, Theodore Dalamagas, Helen Parkinson, François Bancilhon, Giorgos Flouris, Dimitris Sacharidis, Peter Buneman, Dimitris Kotzinos, Yannis Stavrakas, Vassilis Christophides, et al. Diachronic linked data: towards long-term preservation of structured interrelated information. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Open Data, pages 31-39. ACM, 2012.
4. Gioele Barabucci, Angelo Di Iorio, and Francesco Poggi. Integration of legal datasets: from meta-model to implementation. In 15th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services (IIWAS 2013), pages 585-594. ACM, 2013.
5. Christian Bizer, Peter Boncz, Michael L Brodie, and Orri Erling. The meaningful use of big data: four perspectives-four challenges. ACM SIGMOD Record, 40(4):56-60, 2012.
6. Mokrane Bouzeghoub and Zoubida Kedad. Quality in data warehousing. In Information and database quality, pages 163-198. Springer, 2002.
7. Janez Brank, Marko Grobelnik, and Dunja Mladenic. A survey of ontology evaluation techniques. In Proceedings of the conference on data mining and data warehouses (SiKDD 2005), pages 166-170, 2005.
8. Cinzia Cappiello, Chiara Francalanci, and Barbara Pernici. Data quality assessment from the user's perspective. In Proceedings of the 2004 international workshop on Information quality in information systems, pages 68-73. ACM, 2004.
9. A Caro, Coral Calero, Ismael Caballero, and Mario Piattini. Data quality in web applications: A state of the art. In IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet, volume 2, pages 364-368, 2005.
10. Angélica Caro, Coral Calero, Ismael Caballero, and Mario Piattini. A proposal for a set of attributes relevant for web portal data quality. Software Quality Journal, 16(4):513-542, 2008.
11. Paolo Ciancarini, Daniel Russo, Alberto Sillitti, and Giancarlo Succi. A guided tour of the legal implications of software cloning. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering. ACM, 2016.
12. Paolo Ciancarini, Daniel Russo, Alberto Sillitti, and Giancarlo Succi. Reverse engineering: a legal perspective. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM, 2016.
13. World Wide Web Foundation and Open Data Institute. Open data barometer global report (second edition). http://www.opendatabarometer.org, 2015. Accessed: 2011-02-11.
14. M Fugini, Massimo Mecella, Pierluigi Plebani, Barbara Pernici, and Monica Scannapieco. Data quality in cooperative web information systems. Personal Communication. citeseer. ist. psu. edu/fugini02data. html, 2002.
15. Aldo Gangemi and Valentina Presutti. Ontology design patterns. In Handbook on ontologies, pages 221-243. Springer, 2009.
16. J. Gao, S. Yu, and L. Cao. Message from the ieee bigdataservice 2015 program chairs. In IEEE First International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService), pages 12, 2015.
17. Jerry Gao, Lihui Lei, A Guruvayya, MK Vijaykumar, RR Balasubramanian, and V Patil. Big data sensing and services: A tutorial. In IEEE First International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService), pages 79-88. IEEE, 2015.
18. Juan Garcá, Francisco JoseGarcá-Peñalvo, and Roberto Therón. A survey on ontology metrics. In Knowledge management, information systems, E-learning, and sustainability research, pages 22-27. Springer, 2010.
19. Michael Gertz, M Tamer Ö zsu, Gunter Saake, and Kai-Uwe Sattler. Report on the dagstuhl seminar. ACM SIGMOD Record, 33(1):127-132, 2004.
20. Asunción Gómez-Pérez, Mariano Fernández-López, and Oscar Corcho. Ontological Engineering: with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
21. Harry Halpin, Patrick J Hayes, James P McCusker, Deborah L McGuinness, and Henry S Thompson. When owl: sameas isnt the same: An analysis of identity in linked data. In The Semantic Web-ISWC 2010, pages 305-320. Springer, 2010.
22. Steve Harris, Andy Seaborne, and Eric Prudhommeaux. Sparql 1.1 query language. W3C Recommendation, 2013.
23. Pascal Hitzler, Bijan Krtzsch, Markus amd Parsia, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and Sebastian Rudolph. Owl 2 web ontology language primer. W3C Recommendation, 2012.
24. Aidan Hogan, Andreas Harth, Alexandre Passant, Stefan Decker, and Axel Polleres. Weaving the pedantic web. In International Workshop on Linked Data on the Web (LDOW2010) at WWW2010. CEUR, 2010.
25. Prateek Jain, Pascal Hitzler, Peter Z Yeh, Kunal Verma, and Amit P Sheth. Linked data is merely more data. In AAAI Spring Symposium: linked data meets artificial intelligence, volume 11, pages 82-86, 2010.
26. Krzysztof Janowicz. Place and location on the web of linked data. http://stko.geog.ucsb.edu/location linked data, 2013. Accessed: 2016-02-11.
27. Stephen H Kan. Metrics and models in software quality engineering. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 2002.
28. Yang W Lee, Diane M Strong, Beverly K Kahn, and Richard Y Wang. Aimq: a methodology for information quality assessment. Information & management, 40(2):133-146, 2002.
29. Frank Manola and Eric Miller. Resource description framework (rdf). primer. W3C Recommendation, 2004.
30. J Manyika, M Chui, D Farrell, S Van Kuiken, P Groves, and EA Doshi. Open data: Unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information. McKinsey, 2013.
31. Carmen Moraga, Ma Á ngeles Moraga, Angélica Caro, and Coral Calero. Spdqm: Square-aligned portal data quality model. In Ninth International Conference on Quality Software, QSIC, pages 24-25, 2009.
32. Richard R Nelson and Sidney G Winter. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, 2009.
33. Agenzia Digitale per l'Italia (AgID). Linee guida nazionali per la valoralizzazione del patrimonio informativo pubblico. http://www.agid.gov.it/sites/default/files/linee guida/patrimoniopubblicolg2014 v0.7finale.pdf, 2014. Accessed: 2016-02-11.
34. Roger S Pressman. Software engineering: a practitioner's approach. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
35. Diane M Strong, Yang W Lee, and Richard Y Wang. Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM, 40(5):103-110, 1997.
36. Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Asunción Gómez-Pérez, Enrico Motta, and Aldo Gangemi. Ontology engineering in a networked world. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
37. Zhilin Yang, Shaohan Cai, Zheng Zhou, and Nan Zhou. Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting web portals. Information & Management, 42(4):575-589, 2005.