Quality of optical diagnosis of diminutive polyps and associated factors

Endoscopy

Volumn 48, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 817-822

  Pohl, Heiko ^a,b   Bensen, Steve P ^b   Toor, Arifa ^b   Gordon, Stuart R ^b   Levy, L Campbell ^b   Anderson, Peter B ^b   Anderson, Joseph C ^a   Rothstein, Richard I ^b   Robertson, Douglas J ^a  

^a VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ADENOMATOUS POLYP; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENCHMARKING; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIST; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NARROW BAND IMAGING; OPTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; POLYP; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTOSIGMOID ADENOMA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLON POLYP; COLORECTAL TUMOR; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RECTUM; SIGMOID; STANDARDS; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADENOMA; AGED; BENCHMARKING; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLON, SIGMOID; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NARROW BAND IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECTUM; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84973597778     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-108432     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kaminski M. F., Hassan C., Bisschops R. et al. Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy: 2014; 46 435 449
2. Committee A. T., Abu Dayyeh B. K., Thosani N. et al. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc: 2015; 81 502 e501-502, e516
3. Rex D. K., Kahi C., O'Brien M. et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 73 419 422
4. Ladabaum U., Fioritto A., Mitani A. et al. Real-time optical biopsy of colon polyps with narrow band imaging in community practice does not yet meet key thresholds for clinical decisions. Gastroenterology: 2013; 144 81 91
5. Schachschal G., Mayr M., Treszl A. et al. Endoscopic versus histological characterisation of polyps during screening colonoscopy. Gut: 2014; 63 458 465
6. Vu H. T., Sayuk G. S., Hollander T. G. et al. Resect and discard approach to colon polyps: real-world applicability among academic and community gastroenterologists. Dig Dis Sci: 2015; 60 502 508
7. Pohl H., Bensen S. P., Toor A. et al. Cap-assisted colonoscopy and detection of Adenomatous Polyps (CAP) study: a randomized trial. Endoscopy: 2015; 47 891 897
8. Raghavendra M., Hewett D. G., Rex D. K. Differentiating adenomas from hyperplastic colorectal polyps: narrow-band imaging can be learned in 20 minutes. Gastrointestinal endoscopy: 2010; 72 572 576
9. Hewett D. G., Kaltenbach T., Sano Y. et al. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology: 2012; 143 599 607 e591
10. Snover D., Ahnen D., Burt R. et al. Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated polyposis. In: Bosman T., Carneiro F., Hruban R. et al., eds. WHO classification of tumors of the digestive system. Lyon, France WHO: 2010; 160 165
11. Lieberman D. A., Rex D. K., Winawer S. J. et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology: 2012; 143 844 857
12. Rex D. K., Ahnen D. J., Baron J. A. et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol: 2012; 107 1315 1329; quiz 1314, 1330
13. Wang H. S., Pisegna J., Modi R. et al. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance. Gastrointest Endosc: 2013; 77 71 78
14. Paggi S., Rondonotti E., Amato A. et al. Narrow-band imaging in the prediction of surveillance intervals after polypectomy in community practice. Endoscopy: 2015; 47 808 814
15. McGill S. K., Soetikno R., Rastogi A. et al. Endoscopists can sustain high performance for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps following standardized and continued training. Endoscopy: 2015; 47 200 206
16. Patel S. G., Schoenfeld P., Kim H. M. et al. Real-Time characterization of diminutive colorectal polyp histology using narrow-band imaging: implications for the resect and discard strategy. Gastroenterology: 2016; 150 406 418
17. Hassan C., Pickhardt P. J., Rex D. K. A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2010; 8 865 869 869 e861-e863
18. Kessler W. R., Imperiale T. F., Klein R. W. et al. A quantitative assessment of the risks and cost savings of forgoing histologic examination of diminutive polyps. Endoscopy: 2011; 43 683 691
19. Ko C. W., Riffle S., Michaels L. et al. Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2010; 8 166 173
20. Wallace M. B., Crook J. E., Coe S. et al. Accuracy of in vivo colorectal polyp discrimination by using dual-focus high-definition narrow-band imaging colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2014; 80 1072 1087
21. Gupta N., Bansal A., Rao D. et al. Accuracy of in vivo optical diagnosis of colon polyp histology by narrow-band imaging in predicting colonoscopy surveillance intervals. Gastrointest Endosc: 2012; 75 494 502