Comparison of manual and automatic techniques for substriatal segmentation in 11C-raclopride high-resolution PET studies

Nuclear Medicine Communications

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 1074-1087

  Johansson, Jarkko ^a   Alakurtti, Kati ^a,b   Joutsa, Juho ^a,c   Tohka, Jussi ^f,g   Ruotsalainen, Ulla ^d,e   Rinne, Juha O ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b Department of Diagnostic Radiology ^*  (Finland)

^c TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^d TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^e TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^f UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^g HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO GREGORIO MARAÑÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

11C raclopride; PET; Region of interest analysis; Striatum

Indexed keywords

RACLOPRIDE C 11; RACLOPRIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; HIGH RESOLUTION POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; IMAGING SOFTWARE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PET SCANNER; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TEST RETEST VARIABILITY; YOUNG ADULT; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGE PROCESSING; METABOLISM; NEOSTRIATUM; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

AUTOMATION; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; NEOSTRIATUM; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RACLOPRIDE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84973527145     PISSN: 01433636     EISSN: 14735628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000559     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Farde L, Hall H, Ehrin E, Sedvall G. Quantitative analysis of D2 dopamine receptor binding in the living human brain by PET. Science 1986; 231:258-261.
2. Farde L, Nordstrom AL. PET analysis indicates atypical central dopamine receptor occupancy in clozapine-treated patients. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 1992; 17:30-33.
3. Koepp MJ, Gunn RN, Lawrence AD, Cunningham VJ, Dagher A, Jones T, et al. Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game. Nature 1998; 393:266-268.
4. Egerton A, Mehta MA, Montgomery AJ, Lappin JM, Howes OD, Reeves SJ, et al. The dopaminergic basis of human behaviors: a review of molecular imaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2009; 33:1109-1132.
5. Birren JE, Schaie KW. Handbook of the psychology of aging, 5th ed. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 2001.
6. Koob GF, Bloom FE. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of drug dependence. Science 1988; 242:715-723.
7. Joutsa J, Johansson J, Niemelä S, Ollikainen A, Hirvonen MM, Piepponen P, et al. Mesolimbic dopamine release is linked to symptom severity in pathological gambling. Neuroimage 2012; 60:1992-1999.
8. Mawlawi O, Martinez D, Slifstein M, Broft A, Chatterjee R, Hwang DR, et al. Imaging human mesolimbic dopamine transmission with positron emission tomography: I. Accuracy and precision of D(2) receptor parameter measurements in ventral striatum. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001; 21:1034-1057.
9. Martinez D, Slifstein M, Broft A, Mawlawi O, Hwang DR, Huang Y, et al. Imaging human mesolimbic dopamine transmission with positron emission tomography. Part II: amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the functional subdivisions of the striatum. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003; 23:285-300.
10. 11C]-(+)-PHNO: dissection of D3 signal and anatomy. Neuroimage 2011; 54:264-277.
11. Del Campo N, Tait RJ, Acosta-Cabronero J, Hong YT, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Smith R, et al. Quantification of receptor-ligand binding potential in substriatal domains using probabilistic and template regions of interest. Neuroimage 2011; 55:101-112.
12. 11C-raclopride PET using deformable surface models and normalized cuts. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2006; 53:220-227.
13. Tziortzi AC, Haber SN, Searle GE, Tsoumpas C, Long CJ, Shotbolt P, et al. Connectivity-based functional analysis of dopamine release in the striatum using diffusion-weighted MRI and positron emission tomography. Cereb Cortex 2014; 24:1165-1177.
14. Farinha RJ, Ruotsalainen U, Hirvonen J, Tuominen L, Hietala J, Fonseca JM, Tohka J. Segmentation of striatal brain structures from high resolution PET images. Int J Biomed Imaging 2009; 2009:156234.
15. 11C]raclopride with high-resolution positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011; 31:155-165.
16. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19:231-240.
17. Lammertsma AA, Hume SP. Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies. Neuroimage 1996; 4 (Pt 1):153-158.
18. Innis RB, Cunningham VJ, Delforge J, Fujita M, Gjedde A, Gunn RN, et al. Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007; 27:1533-1539.
19. De Jong HW, van Velden FH, Kloet RW, Buijs FL, Boellaard R, Lammertsma AA. Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52:1505-1526.
20. Comtat C, Bataille F, Michel C, Jones JP, Sibomana M, Janeiro L, et al. OSEM-3D reconstruction strategies for the ECAT HRRT. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Record 2004; 6:3492-3496.
21. Comtat C, Sureau FC, Sibomana M, Hong IK, Sjoholm N, Trebossen R. Image based resolution modeling for the HRRT OSEM reconstructions software. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Record 2008; 8:4120-4123.
22. Nuyts J, Dupont P, Stroobants S, Maes A, Mortelmans L, Suetens P. Evaluation of maximum-likelihood based attenuation correction in positron emission tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1999; 46:1136-1141.
23. Watson CC. New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2000; 47:1587-1594.
24. Byars LG, Sibomana M, Burbar Z, Jones J, Panin V, Barker WC, et al. Variance reduction on randoms from coincidence histograms for the HRRT. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Record 2005; 5:2622-2626.
25. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 2005; 26:839-851.
26. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. Neuroimage 2012; 62:782-790.
27. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions. Hum Brain Mapp 1999; 7:254-266.
28. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 2002; 33:341-355.
29. 11)C]raclopride and high-resolution positron emission tomography. Neuroimage 2013; 82:252-259.
30. Juslin A, Tohka J. Unsupervised segmentation of cardiac PET transmission images for automatic heart volume extraction. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006; 1:1077-1080.
31. Dhillon IS, Guan Y, Kulis B. Weighted graph cuts without eigenvectors a multilevel approach. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2007; 29:1944-1957.
32. Tohka J, Zijdenbos A, Evans AC. Fast and robust parameter estimation for statistical partial volume models in brain MRI. NeuroImage 2004; 23:84-97.
33. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86:420-428.
34. Kuhn FP, Warnock GI, Burger C, Ledermann K, Martin-Soelch C, Buck A. Comparison of PET template-based and MRI-based image processing in the quantitative analysis of C11-raclopride PET. EJNMMI Res 2014; 4:7.
35. 11C]raclopride. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993; 13:310-314.
36. McDonald WM, Husain M, Doraiswamy PM, Figiel G, Boyko O, Krishnan KR. A magnetic resonance image study of age-related changes in human putamen nuclei. Neuroreport 1991; 2:57-60.
37. Morris ED, Chefer SI, Lane MA, Muzic RF Jr, Wong DF, Dannals RF, et al. Loss of D2 receptor binding with age in rhesus monkeys: importance of correction for differences in striatal size. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999; 19:218-229.
38. Van Velden FH, Kloet RW, van Berckel BN, Buijs FL, Luurtsema G, Lammertsma AA, Boellaard R. HRRTversus HR+ human brain PET studies: an interscanner test-retest study. J Nucl Med 2009; 50:693-702.
39. Schain M, Varnäs K, Cselényi Z, Halldin C, Farde L, Varrone A. Evaluation of two automated methods for PET region of interest analysis. Neuroinformatics 2014; 12:551-562.