Assessment of invasive breast cancer heterogeneity using whole-tumor magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis correlations with detailed pathological findings

Medicine (United States)

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Ko, Eun Sook ^a   Kim, Jae Hun ^b   Lim, Yaeji ^c   Han, Boo Kyung ^a   Cho, Eun Yoon ^a   Nam, Seok Jin ^b  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Center   (South Korea)

^c Department of Pathology ^*  (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; GADOBUTROL; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; LYMPH VESSEL METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; BREAST TUMOR; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 84973502636     PISSN: 00257974     EISSN: 15365964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002453     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Castellano G, Bonilha L, Li LM, et al. Texture analysis of medical images. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:1061-1069
2. Kyriazi S, Collins DJ, Messiou C, et al. Metastatic ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: assessing chemotherapy response with diffusion-weighted MR imaging-value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients. Radiology. 2011;261:182-192
3. Lista F, Andres G, Caceres F, et al. Evaluation of risk of muscle invasion, perivesical and/or lymph node affectation by diffusionweighted magnetic nuclear resonance in the patient who is a candidate for radical cystectomy. Actas Urol Esp. 2013;37:419-424
4. Donati OF, Mazaheri Y, Afaq A, et al. Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology. 2014;271:143-152
5. Son JY, Lee HY, Lee KS, et al. Quantitative CT analysis of pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules for the distinction of invasive adenocarcinoma from pre-invasive or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. Plos One. 2014;9:e104066
6. Ganeshan B, Abaleke S, Young RC, et al. Texture analysis of nonsmall cell lung cancer on unenhanced computed tomography: initial evidence for a relationship with tumor glucose metabolism and stage. Cancer Imaging. 2010;10:137-143
7. Mikes KA, Ganeshan B, Griffiths MR, et al. Colorectal cancer: texture analysis of portal phase hepatic CT images as a potential marker of survival. Radiology. 2009;250:444-452
8. Goh V, Ganeshan B, Nathan P, et al. Assessment of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell cancers: CT texture as a predictive biomarker. Radiology. 2011;261:165-171
9. James D, Clymer BD, Schmalbrock P. Texture detection of simulated microcalcification susceptibility effects in magnetic resonance imaging of breasts. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:876-881
10. Gibbs P, Turnbull LW. Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:92-98
11. Chen W, Giger ML, Li H, et al. Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:562-571
12. Woods BJ, Clymer BD, Kure T, et al. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrastenhanced magnetic resonance breast image data. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:495-501
13. Holli k, Laaperi AL, Harrison L, et al. Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:135-141
14. Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4414-4422
15. Parikh J, Selmi M, Charles-Edwards G, et al. Changes in primary breast cancer heterogeneity may augment midtreatment MR imaging assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiology. 2014;272:100-112
16. Nelson DA, Tan TT, Rabson AB, et al. Hypoxia and defective apoptosis drive genomic instability and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2004;18:2095-2107
17. Mesker WE, Junggeburt JM, Szuhai K, et al. The carcinoma-stromal ratio of colon carcinoma is an independent factor for survival compared to lymph node status and tumor stage. Cell Oncol. 2007;29:387-398
18. Ko ES, Han BK, Kim RB, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient in estrogen receptor-positive invasive ductal breast carcinoma: correlations with tumor-stroma ratio. Radiology. 2014;271:30-37
19. Hasebe T, Sasaki S, Imoto S, et al. Highly proliferative fibroblasts forming fibrotic focus govern metastasis of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Mod Pathol. 2001;14:325-337
20. Akaike H. Prediction and entropy. In: Atkinson AC, Feinberg SE, eds. A Celebration of Statistics. Springer; 1985:1-24