Tele-health: Assessment of websites on newborn hearing screening in Portuguese Language;Telessaúde: Avaliação de websites sobre triagem auditiva neonatal na Língua Portuguesa

CODAS

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 526-533

  Chaves, Juliana Nogueira ^a   Libardi, Ana Lívia ^a   Agostinho Pesse, Raquel Sampaio ^a   Morettin, Marina ^a   Alvarenga, Kátia de Freitas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Family; Hearing; Internet; Neonatal screening; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOLOGIST; AUDITORY SCREENING; DELPHI STUDY; DIAGNOSIS; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERNET; MALE; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; PORTUGUESE (LANGUAGE); TELEMEDICINE; WRITING; BRAZIL; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEARING LOSS; LANGUAGE; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE;

BRAZIL; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTERNET; LANGUAGE; NEONATAL SCREENING; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84973408017     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23171782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20152014169     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alvarenga KF, Bevilaqcua MC, Melo TM, Lopes AC, Moret ALM. Participação das famílias em programas de saúde auditiva: um estudo descritivo. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011;16(1):49-53
2. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Diretrizes de atenção da triagem auditiva neonatal. Brasília: Mistério da Saúde; 2012
3. Alvarenga KF, Gadret JM, Araújo ES, Bevilacqua MC. Triagem auditiva neonatal: motivos da evasão das famílias no processo de detecção precoce. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;17(3):241-7
4. Pacheco LC, Tochetto TM, Checalin MA, Carvalho CDM. Information on neonatal hearing screening from pregnant women of different social classes. Einstein. 2009;7(2):159-62
5. Hoving C, Visser A, Mullen PD, van den Borne B. A history of patient education by health professionals in Europe and North America: from authority to shared decision making education. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(3):275-81
6. DeLuca JM, Kearney MH, Norton SA, Arnold GL. Internet use by parents of infants with positive newborn screens. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;35(5):879-84
7. Oliveira JSP, Costa MM, Wille MFC. Introdução ao método Delphi. 1. ed. Curitiba: Mundo Material; 2008
8. Morettin M. Classificação internacional de funcionalidade, incapacidade e saúde, versão crianças e jovens (CIF-CJ): elaboração de um checklist para a avaliação da funcionalidade em usuários de implante coclear [tese]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2012
9. Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ. 2002;324(7337):573-7
10. Laplante-Lévesque A, Brännström KJ, Andersson G, Lunner T. Quality and readability of english-language information for adults with hearing impairment and their significant others. Int J Audiol. 2012;51(8):618-26
11. Araia MH, Potter BK. Newborn screening education on the internet: a content analysis of North American newborn screening program websites. J Community Genet. 2011;2(3):127-34
12. Bastos BG. Telessaúde: avaliação de um website como ferramenta de auxilio ao aconselhamento de pais de crianças usuárias de aparelho de amplificação sonora individual [dissertação]. Bauru: Universidade de São Paulo; 2011
13. Martins TBF, Ghiraldelo CM, Nunes MGV, Oliveira Jr. ON. Readability formulas applied to textbooks in brazilian Portuguese [Internet]. 1996 [citado 23 fev 2014]. Disponível em: http://www.nilc.icmc.usp.br/nilc/download/Reltec28.pdf
14. Barboza EMF, Nunes EMA. A inteligibilidade dos websites governamentais brasileiros e o acesso para usuários com baixo nível de escolaridade. Inclusão Social. 2007;2(2):19-33
15. Diaz-Isenrath C. Um estudo sobre Google: questões para uma leitura micropolítica das tecnologias da informação. Liinc em revista. 2005;1(2):96-117
16. GOOGLE. Por que usar o Google [internet]. [citado 22 fev 2015.] Disponível em: http://www.google.com.br/why_use.html
17. Fant KE, Clark SJ, Kemper AR. Completeness and complexity of information available to parents from newborn-screening programs. Pediatrics. 2005;115(5):1268-72
18. Hargreaves KM, Stewart RJ, Oliver SR. Newborn screening information supports public health more than informed choice. Health Educ J. 2005;64(2):110-9
19. Araia MH, Potter BK. Newborn screening education on the internet: a content analysis of North American newborn screening program websites. J Community Genet. 2011;2(3):127-34
20. Araia MH, Wilson BJ, Chakraborty P, Gall K, Honeywell C, Milburn J. et al. Factors associated with knowledge of and satisfaction with newborn screening education: a survey of mothers. Genet Med. 2012;14(12):963-70
21. Hargreaves KM, Stewart RJ, Oliver SR. Informed choice and public health screening for children: the case of blood spot screening. Health Expect. 2005;8(2):161-71
22. Davis TC, Humiston SG, Arnold CL, Bocchini JA, Bass PF, Kennen EM, et al. Recommendations for effective newborn screening communication: results of focus groups with parents, providers, and experts. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5 Pt 2):326-40
23. Arnold CL, Davis TC, Humiston SG, Bocchini JA, Bass PF, Bocchini A, et al. Infant hearing screening: stakeholder recommendations for parent-centered communication. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5 Pt 2):341-9
24. Tluczek A, Orland KM, Nick SW, Brown RL. Newborn screening: an appeal for improved parent education. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2009;23(4):326-34
25. Williams N, Mughal S, Blair M. "Is my child developing normally?": a critical review of web-based resources for parents. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(2):893-7
26. Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Internet-derived information on cleft lip and palate for families with affected children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46(1):75-80
27. [No authors listed]. Serving the family from birth to the medical home: newborn screening: a blueprint for the Future-A call for a national agenda on state newborn screening programs. Pediatrics. 2000;106(2 Pt 2):389-422
28. DeLuca JM, Kearney MH, Norton SA, Arnold GL. Parents' experiences of expanded newborn screening evaluations. Pediatrics. 2011;128(1):53-61
29. MedlinePlus. How to write easy-to-read health materials [Internet]. 2011 [citado 23 fevereiro 2014]. Disponível em: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/etr.html
30. Nicholls SG, Southern KW. Parental information use in the context of newborn bloodspot screening. An exploratory mixed methods study. J Community Genet. 2012;3(4):251-7