Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis reveals correlation between higher WRKY61 expression and reduced symptom severity in Turnip crinkle virus infected Arabidopsis thaliana

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Gao, Ruimin ^a   Liu, Peng ^a   Yong, Yuhan ^a   Wong, Sek Man ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTOME; ZAP1 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS;

ARABIDOPSIS; CARMOVIRUS; DISEASE RESISTANCE; GENETICS; IMMUNOLOGY; METABOLISM; PATHOGENICITY; VIROLOGY;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; CARMOVIRUS; DISEASE RESISTANCE; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84973367318     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep24604     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Osbourn, A. E. Preformed antimicrobial compounds and plant defense against fungal attack. Plant Cell 8, 1821-1831, doi: 10.1105/ tpc.8.10.1821 (1996).
2. Hammond-Kosack, K. E. & Jones, J. D. Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses. Plant Cell 8, 1773-1791 (1996).
3. Yang, Y., Shah, J. & Klessig, D. F. Signal perception and transduction in plant defense responses. Genes Dev 11, 1621-1639 (1997).
4. Scofield, S. R. et al. Molecular basis of gene-for-gene specificity in bacterial speck disease of tomato. Science 274, 2063-2065 (1996).
5. Tang, X. et al. Overexpression of Pto activates defense responses and confers broad resistance. Plant Cell 11, 15-29 (1999).
6. Dempsey, D. A., Wobbe, K. K. & Klessig, D. F. Resistance and Susceptible Responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to Turnip Crinkle Virus. Molecular Plant Pathology 83, 1021-1029 (1993).
7. Simon, A. E. et al. Susceptibility and resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana to turnip crinkle virus. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact 5, 496-503 (1992).
8. Dempsey, D. A., Wobbe, K. K. & Klessig, D. F. Resistance and susceptible responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to turnip crinkle virus. Phytopathology 83, 1021-1029 (1993).
9. Uknes, S., Winter, A. M., Delaney, T., Vernooij, B., Morse, A., Friedrich, L., Nye, G., Potter, S., Ward, E. & Ryals, J. Biological induction of systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 6, 692-698 (1993).
10. Dempsey, D. A., Pathirana, M. S., Wobbe, K. K. & Klessig, D. F. Identification of an Arabidopsis locus required for resistance to turnip crinkle virus. Plant J 11, 301-311 (1997).
11. Jeong, R. D., Chandra-Shekara, A. C., Kachroo, A., Klessig, D. F. & Kachroo, P. HRT-mediated hypersensitive response and resistance to Turnip crinkle virus in Arabidopsis does not require the function of TIP, the presumed guardee protein. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 21, 1316-1324, doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-10-1316 (2008).
12. Ren, T., Qu, F. & Morris, T. J. HRT gene function requires interaction between a NAC protein and viral capsid protein to confer resistance to turnip crinkle virus. Plant Cell 12, 1917-1926 (2000).
13. Cooley, M. B., Pathirana, S., Wu, H. J., Kachroo, P. & Klessig, D. F. Members of the Arabidopsis HRT/RPP8 family of resistance genes confer resistance to both viral and oomycete pathogens. Plant Cell 12, 663-676 (2000).
14. Kachroo, P., Yoshioka, K., Shah, J., Dooner, H. K. & Klessig, D. F. Resistance to turnip crinkle virus in Arabidopsis is regulated by two host genes and is salicylic acid dependent but NPR1, ethylene, and jasmonate independent. Plant Cell 12, 677-690 (2000).
15. Kang, H. G. & Klessig, D. F. The involvement of the Arabidopsis CRT1 ATPase family in disease resistance protein-mediated signaling. Plant Signal Behav 3, 689-690 (2008).
16. Kang, H. G., Kuhl, J. C., Kachroo, P. & Klessig, D. F. CRT1, an Arabidopsis ATPase that interacts with diverse resistance proteins and modulates disease resistance to turnip crinkle virus. Cell Host Microbe 3, 48-57, doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2007.11.006 (2008).
17. Kang, H. G. et al. CRT1 is a nuclear-translocated MORC endonuclease that participates in multiple levels of plant immunity. Nat Commun 3, 1297, doi: 10.1038/ncomms2279 (2012).
18. Pumplin, N. & Voinnet, O. RNA silencing suppression by plant pathogens: defence, counter-defence and counter-counter-defence. Nat Rev Microbiol 11, 745-760, doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3120 (2013).
19. Ding, S. W. & Voinnet, O. Antiviral immunity directed by small RNAs. Cell 130, 413-426, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.039 (2007).
20. Ding, S. W. RNA-based antiviral immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 10, 632-644, doi: 10.1038/nri2824 (2010).
21. Choi, C. W., Qu, F., Ren, T., Ye, X. & Morris, T. J. RNA silencing-suppressor function of Turnip crinkle virus coat protein cannot be attributed to its interaction with the Arabidopsis protein TIP. J Gen Virol 85, 3415-3420, doi: 10.1099/vir.0.80326-0 (2004).
22. Cao, M. et al. The capsid protein of Turnip crinkle virus overcomes two separate defense barriers to facilitate systemic movement of the virus in Arabidopsis. J Virol 84, 7793-7802, doi: 10.1128/JVI.02643-09 (2010).
23. Zhu, S. et al. Double-stranded RNA-binding protein 4 is required for resistance signaling against viral and bacterial pathogens. Cell Rep 4, 1168-1184, doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.018 (2013).
24. Zhu, S. et al. RNA silencing components mediate resistance signaling against turnip crinkle virus. Plant Signal Behav 9, e28435 (2014).
25. Ren, T., Qu, F. & Morris, T. J. The nuclear localization of the Arabidopsis transcription factor TIP is blocked by its interaction with the coat protein of Turnip crinkle virus. Virology 331, 316-324, doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.10.039 (2005).
26. Hills, G. J. et al. Immunogold localization of the intracellular sites of structural and nonstructural tobacco mosaic virus proteins. Virology 161, 488-496 (1987).
27. Wolf, S., Deom, C. M., Beachy, R. N. & Lucas, W. J. Movement protein of tobacco mosaic virus modifies plasmodesmatal size exclusion limit. Science 246, 377-379 (1989).
28. Waigmann, E., Lucas, W. J., Citovsky, V. & Zambryski, P. Direct functional assay for tobacco mosaic virus cell-to-cell movement protein and identification of a domain involved in increasing plasmodesmal permeability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91, 1433-1437 (1994).
29. Burgyan, J. & Havelda, Z. Viral suppressors of RNA silencing. Trends Plant Sci 16, 265-272, doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.02.010 (2011).
30. Gutierrez, C. DNA replication and cell cycle in plants: learning from geminiviruses. EMBO J 19, 792-799, doi: 10.1093/ emboj/19.5.792 (2000).
31. Lai, J. et al. RKP, a RING finger E3 ligase induced by BSCTV C4 protein, affects geminivirus infection by regulation of the plant cell cycle. Plant J 57, 905-917, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03737.x (2009).
32. Cui, X., Fan, B., Scholz, J. & Chen, Z. Roles of Arabidopsis cyclin-dependent kinase C complexes in cauliflower mosaic virus infection, plant growth, and development. Plant Cell 19, 1388-1402, doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.051375 (2007).
33. Herbers, K., Meuwly, P., Frommer, W. B., Metraux, J. P. & Sonnewald, U. Systemic acquired resistance mediated by the ectopic expression of invertase: possible hexose sensing in the secretory pathway. Plant Cell 8, 793-803, doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.5.793 (1996).
34. Chen, H. et al. Up-regulation of LSB1/GDU3 affects geminivirus infection by activating the salicylic acid pathway. Plant J 62, 12-23, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04120.x (2010).
35. Eulgem, T., Rushton, P. J., Robatzek, S. & Somssich, I. E. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci 5, 199-206 (2000).
36. Yamasaki, K. et al. Solution structure of an Arabidopsis WRKY DNA binding domain. Plant Cell 17, 944-956, doi: 10.1105/ tpc.104.026435 (2005).
37. Maeo, K., Hayashi, S., Kojima-Suzuki, H., Morikami, A. & Nakamura, K. Role of conserved residues of the WRKY domain in the DNA-binding of tobacco WRKY family proteins. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 65, 2428-2436, doi: 10.1271/bbb.65.2428 (2001).
38. Eulgem, T. & Somssich, I. E. Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defense signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10, 366-371, doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.020 (2007).
39. Chen, L., Zhang, L., Li, D., Wang, F. & Yu, D. WRKY8 transcription factor functions in the TMV-cg defense response by mediating both abscisic acid and ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, E1963-1971, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221347110 (2013).
40. Cheng, H. et al. The WRKY45-2 WRKY13 WRKY42 Transcriptional Regulatory Cascade Is Required for Rice Resistance to Fungal Pathogen. Plant Physiol 167, 1087-1099, doi: 10.1104/pp.114.256016 (2015).
41. Tan, G. et al. Transcriptome analysis of the compatible interaction of tomato with Verticillium dahliae using RNA-sequencing. Front Plant Sci 6, 428, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00428 (2015).
42. Zuluaga, A. P. et al. Analysis of the tomato leaf transcriptome during successive hemibiotrophic stages of a compatible interaction with the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Mol Plant Pathol 17, 42-54, doi: 10.1111/mpp.12260 (2016).
43. Guo, L. et al. Genome and transcriptome analysis of the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense causing banana vascular wilt disease. PLoS One 9, e95543, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095543 (2014).
44. Schmidtke, C. et al. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of the plant pathogen Xanthomonas identifies sRNAs with putative virulence functions. Nucleic Acids Res 40, 2020-2031, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr904 (2012).
45. Mandadi, K. K. & Scholthof, K. B. Genome-wide analysis of alternative splicing landscapes modulated during plant-virus interactions in Brachypodium distachyon. Plant Cell 27, 71-85, doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.133991 (2015).
46. Kawahara, Y. et al. Simultaneous RNA-seq analysis of a mixed transcriptome of rice and blast fungus interaction. PLoa One 7, e49423, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049423 (2012).
47. Postnikova, O. A. & Nemchinov, L. G. Comparative analysis of microarray data in Arabidopsis transcriptome during compatible interactions with plant viruses. Virol J 9, 101, doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-9-101 (2012).
48. Pandey, S. P. & Somssich, I. E. The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant immunity. Plant Physiol 150, 1648-1655, doi: 10.1104/pp.109.138990 (2009).
49. Xu, X., Chen, C., Fan, B. & Chen, Z. Physical and functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors. Plant Cell 18, 1310-1326, doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.037523 (2006).
50. Chen, H. et al. Roles of Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40 and WRKY60 transcription factors in plant responses to abscisic acid and abiotic stress. BMC Plant Biol 10, 281, doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-281 (2010).
51. Yu, D., Chen, C. & Chen, Z. Evidence for an important role of WRKY DNA binding proteins in the regulation of NPR1 gene expression. Plant Cell 13, 1527-1540 (2001).
52. Wang, D., Amornsiripanitch, N. & Dong, X. A genomic approach to identify regulatory nodes in the transcriptional network of systemic acquired resistance in plants. PLos Pathog 2, e123, doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020123 (2006).
53. Chen, C. & Chen, Z. Potentiation of developmentally regulated plant defense response by AtWRKY18, a pathogen-induced Arabidopsis transcription factor. Plant Physiol 129, 706-716, doi: 10.1104/pp.001057 (2002).
54. Ryu, H. S. et al. A comprehensive expression analysis of the WRKY gene superfamily in rice plants during defense response. Plant Cell Rep 25, 836-847, doi: 10.1007/s00299-006-0138-1 (2006).
55. Mangelsen, E. et al. Phylogenetic and comparative gene expression analysis of barley (Hordeum vulgare) WRKY transcription factor family reveals putatively retained functions between monocots and dicots. BMC Genomics 9, 194, doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-194 (2008).
56. Yang, B., Jiang, Y., Rahman, M. H., Deyholos, M. K. & Kav, N. N. Identification and expression analysis of WRKY transcription factor genes in canola (Brassica napus L.) in response to fungal pathogens and hormone treatments. BMC Plant Biol 9, 68, doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-68 (2009).
57. Sarris, P. F. et al. A plant immune receptor detects pathogen effectors that target WRKY transcription factors. Cell 161, 1089-1100, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.024 (2015).
58. Minton, K. Plant immunity: Host mimicry of pathogen virulence targets. Nat Rev Immunol 15, 401, doi: 10.1038/nri3876 (2015).
59. Zhang, X., Henriques, R., Lin, S. S., Niu, Q. W. & Chua, N. H. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana using the floral dip method. Nat Protoc 1, 641-646, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.97 (2006).
60. Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc 7, 562-578, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016 (2012).
61. Patel, R. K. & Jain, M. NGS QC Toolkit: a toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLos One 7, e30619, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030619 (2012).
62. Supek, F., Bosnjak, M., Skunca, N. & Smuc, T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLos One 6, e21800, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021800 (2011).
63. Heaton, L. A., Carrington, J. C. & Morris, T. J. Turnip crinkle virus infection from RNA synthesized in vitro. Virology 170, 214-218 (1989).
64. Gao, R., Ng, F. K., Liu, P. & Wong, S. M. Hibiscus chlorotic ringspot virus coat protein upregulates sulfur metabolism genes for enhanced pathogen defense. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 25, 1574-1583, doi: 10.1094/MPMI-08-12-0203-R (2012).