Garner interference is not solely driven by stimulus uncertainty

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1846-1853

  Burns, Devin M ^a  

^a MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

EBRW; Garner interference; Integral; Separable; Tectonic

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CLASSIFICATION; COLOR VISION; HUMAN; REACTION TIME; UNCERTAINTY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CLASSIFICATION; COLOR PERCEPTION; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; UNCERTAINTY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84973162586     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1054-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Amishav, R., & Kimchi, R. (2010). Perceptual integrality of componential and configural information in faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17(5), 743–748.
2. Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (1994). A response time theory of separability and integrality in speeded classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38(4), 423–466.
3. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93(2), 154–179.
4. Atkinson, A. P., Tipples, J., Burt, D. M., & Young, A. W. (2005). Asymmetric interference between sex and emotion in face perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 67(7), 1199– 1213.
5. Bartlett, J. C., Searcy, J. H., & Abdi, H. (2003). What are the routes to face recognition. In Rhodes, M., & Peterson, G. (Eds.) Perception of faces, objects and scenes: analytic and holistic processes (21–52). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6. Dyson, B. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (2010). Decomposing the Garner interference paradigm: Evidence for dissociations between macrolevel and microlevel performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1676–1691.
7. Fitousi, D., & Wenger, M. J. (2013). Variants of independence in the perception of facial identity and expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 133–155.
8. Ganel, T., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (2002). Perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: Further evidence for the single-route hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(4), 854–867.
9. Ganel, T., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., & Goodale, M. A. (2005). Interactions between the processing of gaze direction and facial expression. Vision Research, 45(9), 1191–1200.
10. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum Associates.
11. Garner, W. R. (1976). Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8(1), 98–123.
12. Kaufmann, J. M., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2004). Expression influences the recognition of familiar faces. Perception, 33(4), 399–408.
13. Melara, R. D., & Algom, D. (2003). Driven by information: A tectonic theory of Stroop effects. Psychological Review; Psychological Review, 110(3), 422–471.
14. Melara, R. D., Marks, L. E., & Potts, B. C. (1993). Primacy of dimensions in color perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(5), 1082–1104.
15. Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. W. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice. Memory and Cognition, 21(5), 627–645.
16. Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. W. (1994). Contextual influences on interactive processing: Effects of discriminability, quantity, and uncertainty. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 56(1), 73–90.
17. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104(2), 266–300.
18. Peirce, J. W. (2007). Psychopy—psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8–13.