The role of institutional sedimentation, regulatory ambiguity and institutional footholds in shaping alcohol governance in California and Pennsylvania

Territory, Politics, Governance

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 135-149

  Patel Campillo, Anouk ^a   Delessio Parson, Anne ^a   Smith, Stephen M ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical juncture; Event sequencing; Institutional; Institutional footholds; Market formation; Prohibition; Regulatory ambiguity; Sedimentation; Wine

Indexed keywords

EID: 84971407382     PISSN: 21622671     EISSN: 2162268X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2014.893835     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AOKI M. (1988) Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2. BERGER P. L. and LUCKMANN T. (1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Random House, New York.
3. BLOCKER J. S., FAHEY D. M. and TYRRELL I. R. (2003) Alcohol and Temperance in Modern History: An International Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, CA.
4. BONANNO A. (1998) Liberal democracy in the global era: implications for the agro-food sector, Agriculture and Human Values 15, 223-242.
5. DUNSFORD J. E. (1962) State monopoly and price-fixing in retail liquor distribution, Wisconsin Law Review May, 454-482.
6. EVANS P. B. (1979) Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
7. FLIGSTEIN N. (2001) The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
8. GARRET G. (1998) Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. GERTLER M. S. (2010) Rules of the game: the place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies 44(1), 1-15.
10. GRANOVETTER M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 481-510.
11. HALL P. A. and TAYLOR R. C. R. (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms*, Political Studies 44(5), 936-957.
12. HODGEN D. (2008) US Wine Industry 2008. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
13. JULLIEN B. and SMITH A. (2011) Conceptualizing the role of politics in the economy: industries and their institutionalizations, Review of International Political Economy 18(3), 358-383.
14. KATZENSTEIN P. J. (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
15. KRIPPNER G. R. (2005) The financialization of the American economy, Socio-Econ Review 3(2), 173-208.
16. MAHONEY J. (2001) Radical, reformist and aborted liberalism: origins of national regimes in Central America, Journal of Latin American Studies 33(2), 221-256.
17. MENDELSON R. (2009) From Demon to Darling: A Legal History of Wine in America. University Of California Press, Berkeley.
18. MKF RESEARCH (2006) Economic Impact of PennsylvaniaWine and Winegrapes 2005. Commissioned by the Pennsylvania Wine Marketing and Research Program. October (available at: http:// pennsylvaniawine.com/PastEconomicReport.pdf) (accessed on 15 March 2013).
19. MKF RESEARCH (2009) The Economic Impact of Pennsylvania Wine and Winegrapes. Commissioned by the Pennsylvania Wine Marketing and Research Program. August (available at: http:// pennsylvaniawine.com/economic-impact-report) (accessed on 15 March 2013).
20. MORGAN P. A. (1988) Power, politics and public health: the political power of the alcohol beverage industry, Journal of Public Health Policy 9(2), 177-197.
21. MUNSHI M. A. (1997) Comment: share the wine. Liquor control in Pennsylvania: a time for reform, University of Pittsburgh Law Review 58(2), 507-547.
22. PARSONS C. (2007) How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
23. PATEL-CAMPILLO A. (2011) Forging the neoliberal competitiveness agenda: planning policy and practice in the Dutch and Colombian cut-flower commodity chains, Environment and Planning A 43, 2516-2532.
24. PATEL-CAMPILLO A. (2014) For competitiveness sake? Material competition vs. competitiveness as a national project, in WOLF S. A. and BONNANO A. (Eds) The Neoliberal Regime in the Agri-Food Sector: Crisis, Resilience, and Restructuring, pp. 207-224. Routledge, New York.
25. PENNSYLVANIA WINERY ASSOCIATION (2007) Vintage 2012: An Investment in Pennsylvania’s Economy: A Five-Year Plan to Double the Impact of Pennsylvania’s Vineyards and Wineries. Pennsylvania Winery Association, Harrisburg, PA. (available at: http://www.pennsylvaniawine. com/Vintage2012.pdf) (accessed on 29 June 2010).
26. PIERSON P. (2000) Not just what, but when: timing and sequence in political processes, Studies in American Political Development 14(1), 72-92.
27. PINNEY T. (1989) A History of Wine in America: From the Beginnings to Prohibition. University of California Press, Berkeley.
28. PINNEY T. (2005) A History of Wine in America: From Prohibition to the Present. University Of California Press, Berkeley.
29. POLANYI K. (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Beacon Press, Boston.
30. SCOTT W. R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations. Sage Publications, London.
31. SEAWRIGHT J. and GERRING J. (2008) Case study research: a menu of qualitative and quantitative options, Political Research Quarterly 61(2), 292-308.
32. SMITH A. (2013) When sector meets territory: the case of European union wine policy, Territory, Politics, Governance 1(2), 203-222.
33. THELEN K. (1999) Historical institutionalism in comparative politics, Annual Review of Political Science 2(1), 369-404.
34. THELEN K. (2000) Timing and temporality in the analysis of institutional evolution and change, Studies in American Political Development 14, 101-108.
35. TOLBERT P. S. and ZUCKER L. G. (1996) Handbook of organization studies, in CLEGG S. R., HARDY C. and NORD W. R. (Eds) The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory, pp. 175-190. Sage Publications, London.