When territory deborders territoriality

Territory, Politics, Governance

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 21-45

  Sassen, Saskia ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Bordering capabilities; Capability; Informality; Jurisdiction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84971372055     PISSN: 21622671     EISSN: 2162268X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2013.769895     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Agnew J. (1994) The territorial trap: the geographical assumption of international relations theory, Review of International Political Economy 1(1), 53-80.
2. Agnew J. (2005) Sovereignty regimes: territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95(2), 437-461.
3. Aman A. C. Jr. (1995) A global perspective on current regulatory reforms: rejection, relocation or reinvention?, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 2(2), 429-464.
4. Anderson J. (1996) The shifting stage of politics: new medieval and postmodern territorialities?, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14(2), 133-153.
5. Avgerou C., Mansell R., Quah D. and Silverston R. (Eds) (2007) Oxford Handbook on Information and Communication Technologies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. AVSI and UNHCR (2009) A Time Between: Moving on from Internal Displacement in Northern Uganda. AVSI and UNHCR, Geneva.
7. Bartlett, A. (2007). The city and the self: the emergence of new political subjects in London, in Sassen S. (Ed.) Deciphering the Global: Its Spaces, Scales and Subjects, 221-243. Routledge, New York and London.
8. Beck U. (2000) What Is Globalization? P. Camiller (Trans). Polity Press, Cambridge.
9. Benkler Y. (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
10. Berman P. S. (2002) The globalization of jurisdiction, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151(2), 311-545.
11. Blumenson E. (2006) The challenge of a global standard of justice: peace, pluralism, and punishment at the International Criminal Court, The Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 44(3), 801-874.
12. Brenner N. (2004) New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Brenner N. and Elden S. (2009) Henri Lefebvre on state, space, territory, International Political Sociology 3(4), 353-377.
14. Brighenti A. M. (2010) Lines, barred lines. Movement, territory and the law, International Journal of Law in Context 6(3), 217-227.
15. Brownlie I. (2008) Principles of Public International Law, 7th Edn. Open University Press, Oxford.
16. Buxbaum H. (2009) Territory, territoriality and the resolution of jurisdictional conflict, American Journal of Comparative Law 57(2), 631-676.
17. Buxbaum H. (2010) National jurisdiction and global business networks, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 17(1), 165-181.
18. Cerny P. G. (1997) Paradoxes of the competition state: the dynamics of political globalization, Government and Opposition 32(2), 251-274.
19. Cerny, P. G. (2000). Public Goods, States and Governance in a Globalizing World. Routledge, London.
20. Coutin S. B. (2000) Denationalization, inclusion, and exclusion: negotiating the boundaries of belonging, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 7(2), 585-593.
21. Cutler A. C. (1997) Artifice, ideology, and paradox: the public/private distinction in international law, Review of International Political Economy 4(2), 261-285.
22. Cutler A. C. (2001) Globalization, the rule of law, and the modern law merchant: medieval or law capitalist associations?, Constellations 8(4), 408-502.
23. Cutler A. C., Haufler V. and Porter T. (Eds) (1999) Private Authority and International Affairs. State University of New York Press, Sarasota Springs.
24. Cutler C. and Gill S. (Eds) (2013) The New Constitutionalism and the Future of Global Governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Denning D. E. (1999) Information Warfare and Security. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, MA.
26. Elden S. (2007) Governmentality, calculation, territory, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25(3), 562-580.
27. Elden S. (2010) Land, terrain, territory, Progress in Human Geography 34(6), 799-817.
28. Ford R. T. (1999) Law's territory (a history of jurisdiction), Michigan Law Review 97(4), 843-930.
29. Fredriksen A. (2012) Making Humanitarian Action Global: Coordinating Crisis Response Through the Cluster Approach. Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, Department of Sociology.
30. Gill S. (1996) Globalization, democratization, and the politics of indifference, in Mittelman J. H. (Ed.) Globalization: Critical Reflections, pp. 205-228. Lynne Reiner, Boulder, CO.
31. Gill S. (2008) Power and Resistance in the New World Order, 2nd Edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
32. Goldsmith J. and Wu T. (2006) Who Controls the Internet?: Illusions of a Borderless World. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
33. Gottmann J. (1973) The Significance of Territory. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
34. Grant J. (2011) Bank and broker trading networks under attack, Financial Times, 7 April, London (available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0db9f3da-6140-11e0-ab25-00144feab49a. html#axzz1kwDMuDHF) (accessed on 28 August 2012).
35. Held D. and McGrew A. (Eds) (2007) Globalization Theory: Approaches and Controversies. Polity Press, Cambridge.
36. Helleiner E. N. (1994) States and the Reemergence of Global Finance. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
37. Helleiner E. N. (1995) Explaining the globalization of financial markets: bringing the state back in, Review of International Political Economy 2(2), 315-341.
38. Helleiner E. N. (1999) Sovereignty, territoriality and the globalization of finance, in Smith D. A., Solinger D. J. and Topik S. C. (Eds) States and Sovereignty in the Global Economy, pp. 138- 155. Routledge, London.
39. Hirst P. and Thompson G. (1996) Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance. Polity Press, Cambridge.
40. Hovil L. (2010) Hoping for Peace, Afraid of War: The Dilemmas of Repatriation and Belonging on the Borders of Uganda and South Sudan. UNHCR New Issues in Refugee Research, Research Paper no. 196.
41. IOM (2012) GATS Mode 4 available at: http://www.iom.int/jahia/Jahia/developingmigration- policy/migration-trade/GATS-mode-4 (accessed on 30 May 2012).
42. Jessop B. (1999) Reflections on globalization and its (Il)logic(s), in Olds K., Kelly P. F., Kong L., Yeung H. W. and Dicken P. (Eds) Globalisation and the Asia Pacific: Contested Territories, pp. 17-36. Routledge, London.
43. Joppke C. (Ed.) (1998) Challenge to the Nation-State: Immigration in Western Europe and the United States. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
44. Kaiser T. (2010) Dispersal, division and diversification: durable solutions and Sudanese refugees in Uganda, Journal of Eastern African Studies 4(1), 44-60.
45. Keohane R. O.,Moravcsik A. and Slaughter A. M. (2000) Legalized dispute resolution: interstate and transnational, International Organization 54(3), 457-488.
46. Knop K. (2000) Here and there: international law in domestic courts, Journal of International Law and Politics 32(2), 501-535.
47. Knop K. (2002) Diversity and Self-determination in International Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
48. Krasner S. D. (1993) Westphalia and all that, in Goldstein J. and Keohane R. (Eds) Ideas and Foreign Policy, pp. 235-264. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
49. Krasner S. D. (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
50. Krasner S. D. (2004) Globalization, power and authority, in Mansfield E. D. and Sisson R. (Eds) The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Democracy, Autonomy, and Conflict in Comparative and International Politics, pp. 60-81. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH.
51. Krasner S. D. (2009) Power, the State, and Sovereignty: Essays on International Relations. Routledge, New York.
52. Kratochwil F. (1986) Of systems, boundaries and territoriality: an inquiry into the formation of the state system, World Politics 39(1), 27-52.
53. Kratochwil F. (2011) Of Maps, Law, and Politics: An Inquiry into the Changing Meaning of Territoriality. DIIS Working Paper 2011:03. DIIS, Copenhagen.
54. Latham R. and Sassen S. (Eds) (2005) Digital formations: constructing an object of study, Digital Formations: IT and New Architectures in the Global Realm, pp. 1-34. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
55. Law J. (1993) Organising Modernity: Social Ordering and Social Theory. Blackwell, Oxford.
56. Long K. (2010) Home Alone? A Review of the Relationship Between Repatriation, Mobility and Durable Solutions for Refugees. UNHCR Policy Development and Evaluation Service.
57. Long K. (2011) Permanent Crises? Unlocking the Protracted Displacement of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons. Refugee Studies Centre, Oxford University, Oxford.
58. Luhmann N. (Ed.) (1995 [1984]) Social Systems. J. Bednarz, Jr. with D. Baecker (Trans). Stanford University Press, Stanford.
59. Maldonado-Torres N. (2007) On the coloniality of being, Cultural Studies 21(2), 240-270.
60. Merry S. E. (2006) New legal realism and the ethnography of transnational law, Law and Social Inquiry 31(4), 975-995.
61. Mignolo W. (2007) Delinking: the rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality, and the grammar of de-coloniality, Cultural Studies 21(2), 449-514.
62. Miller R. and Zumbansen P. (2011) Comparative Law as Transnational Law: A Decade of the German Law Journal. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
63. Neuman G. (1996) Strangers to the Constitution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
64. Paasi A. (1996) Territories, Boundaries and Consciousness: The Changing Geographies of the Finnish- Russian Border. Wiley, New York.
65. Paasi A. (1997) Geographical perspectives on Finnish national identity, Geo Journal 43(1), 41-50.
66. Paasi A. (2003) "Territory", chapter eight, in Agnew J., Mitchell K. and Toal G. (Eds) A Companion to Political Geography, pp. 109-122. Blackwell, Oxford.
67. Paasi A. (2012) Border studies reanimated: going beyond the territorial/relational divide, Environment and Planning A 44(10), 2303-2309.
68. Painter J. (2010) Rethinking territory, Antipode 42(5), 1090-1118.
69. Panizzon M. (2010) International law of economic migration: a Menage a Trois? GATS Mode 4, EPAs, and bilateral migration agreements, Journal of World Trade 44(6), 1207-1252.
70. Panizzon M. (2011) Interfacing the temporary movement of workers in 'Mode 4 of GATS' with bilateral migration agreements, American Society of International Law (ASIL) Proceedings, Vol. 104, 2010; NCCR Working Paper No 2011/07.
71. Pauly L. W. (2002) Global finance, political authority, and the problem of legitimation, in Hall R. B. and Biersteker T. J. (Eds) The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance, pp. 76- 90. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
72. Pittkin H. F. (1972) The Concept of Representation. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
73. Quijano A. (2000) Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism and Latin America, Nepantla: Views from the South 1(3), 533-580.
74. Quijano A. (2007) Coloniality and modernity/rationality, Cultural Studies 21(2-3), 168-178.
75. Rantanen T. (2005) The Media and Globalization. SAGE, London.
76. Rastan R. (2007) The Power of the Prosecutor in Initiating Investigations, Paper prepared for the symposium on the International Criminal Court, 2-4 February, Beijing, International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, Vancouver (available at: http://www. icclr.law.ubc.ca/Site%20Map/ICC/PoweroftheProsecutor.pdf) (accessed on 28 May 2012)
77. Raustiala K. (2005) The Geography of Justice, UCLA School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 05-7 (available at: http://ssrn.com/ abstract=693924) (accessed on 13 August 2012) (Paper later published in Fordham Law Review vol. 73.).
78. Rodrik D. (2011) The Globaliztion Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy.W.W. Norton, New York.
79. Ruggie J. G. (1993) Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in international relations, International Organization 47(1), 139-174.
80. Sack R. D. (1986) Human Territoriality: Its History and Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
81. Sassen S. (1996) Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. Columbia University Press, New York.
82. Sassen S. (2008) Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages, 2nd Edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
83. Sassen S. (2009) Bordering capabilities versus borders: implications for national borders, Michigan Journal of International Law 30(3), 567-597.
84. Sassen, S. (2011). The global street: making the political. Globalizations 8(5), 565-571.
85. Sassen S. (2013) Ungoverned Territories. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
86. Schwarcz S. L. (2002) Private ordering, Northwestern University Law Review 97(1), 319-350.
87. Spiro P. J. (2008) Beyond Citizenship: American Identity after Globalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
88. Stiglitz J. E. and Charlton A. (2005) Fair Trade for All: How Trade Can Promote Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
89. Taylor P. J. (1993) Political Geography: World-Economy, Nation-State and Locality. Longman, London.
90. Taylor P. J. (1994) The state as container: territoriality in the modern world-system, Progress in Human Geography 18(2), 151-162.
91. Taylor P. J. (1996) Territorial absolutism and its evasions, Geography Research Forum 16, 1-12.
92. Taylor P. J. (2000) World cities and territorial states under conditions of contemporary globalization, Political Geography 19(1), 5-32.
93. Teubner G. (2004) Societal constitutionalism: alternatives to state-centered constitutional theory, in Joerges C., Sand I. J. and Teubner G. (Eds) Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism, pp. 3-28. Hartford Publishing, Hartford, MA.
94. Teubner G. (2011) Constitutionalising polycontexturality, Social and Legal Studies 20(2), 209- 220.
95. Teubner G. (2012) Constitutional Fragments. Societal Constitutionalism in the Globalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
96. The Economist (2011) Some like it not: institutional investors either love dark pools or hate them, 20 August (available at: http://www.economist.com/node/21526387) (accessed on 28 August 2012).
97. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World-System. Academic Press, New York.
98. Walker R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
99. Weiss L. (1998) The Myth of the Powerless State. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
100. WTO (2009) Presence of Natural Persons (Mode 4): Background Note by the Secretariat, Council for Trade in Services, S/C/W/301, 15 September.
101. Zumbansen P. (2012) Defining the Space of Transnational Law: Legal Theory, Global Governance and Legal Pluralism, Paper given at WBZ, Berlin Colloquium: Rethinking Law in a Global Context: Rethinking the National/International Divide, 29 May (available at: http://www.wzb.eu/sites/ default/files/u273/zumbansen_2012_defining_the_space_of_transnational_law_wzb_hu. pdf) (accessed on 9 September 2012).