Estimating cost-effectiveness in public health: A summary of modelling and valuation methods

Health Economics Review

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-6

  Marsh, Kevin ^a   Phillips, Ceri J ^b   Fordham, Richard ^c   Bertranou, Evelina ^d   Hale, Janine ^e  

^a UNITED BIOSOURCE CORPORATION   (United States)

^b SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^d TMKG   (United Kingdom)

^e WELSH GOVERNMENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Economic evaluation; Modelling; Public health; Valuation methods

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; EVALUATION RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; WELLBEING;

EID: 84971367728     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21911991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2191-1991-2-17     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Watson V, Carnon A, Ryan M, Cox D: Involving the public in priority setting: a case study using discrete choice experiments. J Public Health Med 2011. advanced access, published 11th Dec. 2011. http://jpubhealth. oxfordjournals. org/content/34/2/253. long.
2. Williams I, Bryan S, McIver S: The use of economic evaluations in NHS decision-making: a review and empirical investigation. Health Technol Assess 2008, 12(7): 1-175. iii, ix-x.
3. Drummond M, Weatherly H, Claxton K, Cookson R, Ferguson B, Godfrey C, Rice N, Sculpher M, Sowden A: Assessing the challenges of applying standard methods of economic evaluation to public health interventions. Public Health Research Consortium, York; 2007.
4. Kentaro K, et al.: Classification of FEE studies in NHS EED according to ICD-10 categories. Cochrane Collaboration Colloquium, Ottawa; 2004.
5. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC: Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 1996.
6. NICE: Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. NICE, London; 2008.
7. Fox-Rushby, et al.: "Prioritisation of Prevention Services" Final Report. Health England, London; 2008. http://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pubmed/20825626.
8. NICE: Methods for development of NICE public health guidance. Second Edition edition. NICE, London; 2009. http://www. nice. org. uk/media/2FB/53/PHMethodsManual110509. pdf.
9. NICE: Behaviour change at population, community and individual levels. Public health guidance 6, London; 2007.
10. Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacot N, Glanville J: Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 2004, 8: 1-172.
11. Cooper NJ, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Paisley S, Jones DR: Use of evidence in economic decision models: practical and methodological issues. Health Econ 2007, 16(12): 1277-1286.
12. Brennan A, Chick SE, Davies R: A taxonomy of model structures for economic evaluation of health technologies. Health Econ 2006, 15: 1295-1310.
13. Briggs A, Sculpher M, Claxton K: Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2006.
14. Kim SY, Goldie SJ: Cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccination programmes. A focused review of modelling approaches. Pharmacoeconomics 2008., 26(3): http://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pubmed/18282015.
15. Caro JJ, Möller J, Getsios D: Discrete event simulation: the preferred technique for health economic evaluations? Value in health. 2001, 13(8): 1056-1060.
16. Pearce DW, Turner RK: Economics of natural resources and the environment. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead; 1990.
17. Bateman IJ, Willis KG: Valuing normal preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in US EU and developing countries. OUP, Oxford; 1999.
18. Jones-Lee MW: The value of transport safety. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 1990, 6: 39-60.
19. Smith RD: The discrete willingness-to-pay question format in health economics: should we adopt environmental guidelines. Medical Decision Making 2000, 20: 194-206.
20. Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H: Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. 58 Federal Register 1993, 4601-4614. http://www. cbe. csueastbay. edu/~alima/courses/4306/articles/NOAA%20on%20contingent%20valuation%201993. pdf.
21. HM Treasury: Green Book. HMT, London; 2003.
22. McDaid D, Needle J: Economic evaluation and public health: mapping the literature. Welsh Assembly. Health Promotion Division, Cardiff; 2006.
23. Dolan P, Metcalfe R, Munro V, Christensen MC: Valuing lives and life years: anomalies, implications and an alternative. Health Econ Policy Law 2008, 3: 277-300.
24. Dolan P, Metcalfe R: Valuing non-market goods: a comparison of preference-based and experience-based approaches. LSE working papers. 2007.
25. Matrix Knowledge Group: Prioritising investments in preventative Health. 2009. http://www. healthengland. org/publications/HealthEnglandReportNo5. pdf.
26. Coast J, Smith R, Lorgelly P: Should the capability approach be applied in health economics?Healtheconomics 2008, 17: 667-670.
27. Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J: Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res 2012, 21(1): 167-76.
28. Dolan P, White M: How can measures of subjective wellbeing be used to inform public policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2007, 2: 71-85.
29. Stiglitz JE Sen A, Fitoussi J-P: Measurement of economic performance and social progress. The Sarkozy Commission 2009. http://www. stiglitz-sen-fitoussi. fr/documents/rapport_anglais. pdf.
30. ONS: Measuring subjective wellbeing in the UK, investigation of subjective well-being data from ONS opinion surveys. 2011. http://www. ons. gov. uk/ons/rel/wellbeing/measuring-subjective-wellbeing-in-the-uk/investigation-of-subjective-well-being-data-from-the-ons-opinions-surv ey/index. html.
31. Peiró A: Happiness, satisfaction and socio-economic conditions: some international evidence. Journal of Socio-Economics 2006, 35: 348-365.
32. Marsh K, Bertranou E: Can subjective well-being measures be used to value policy outcomes? The example of engagement in culture. Cultural Trends in press.
33. Romero C: Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental economics: an approximation. European Journal of Operational Research 1997, 96: 81-89.
34. Delvin N, Sussex J: Incorporating multiple criteria into HTA. Office of Health Economics, London; 2011.
35. Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Edwards NM, Flottemesch TJ, Goodman MJ, Solberg LI: Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prev Med 2006, 31(1): 52-61.
36. Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Edwards NM, Flottemesch TJ, Goodman MJ, Solberg LI: Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: methods. Am J Prev Med 2006, 31(1): 90-96.
37. Wilson EC, Rees J, Fordham RJ: Developing a prioritisation framework in an English Primary Care Trust. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2006, 4: 3.
38. Wilson EC, Sussex J, Macleod C, Fordham RJ: Prioritizing health technologies in a Primary Care Trust. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007, 12(2): 80-85.
39. Claxton K, Devlin N: Briefing Paper for Methods Review Workshop on Structured Decision Making. NICE, London; 2011.